What´s Therapeutic Cloning Ethical?

Improved Essays
The reproductive cloning of human embryos is largely considered unethical because a human clone would have a greatly decreased quality of life; clones often suffer from genetic and physical abnormalities, and have greatly shortened lifespans. Others fear that the reproductive cloning of human embryos has the potential to be abused. In theory, one could create human clones for purpose of organ harvesting. For these reasons, many countries have halted research on the reproductive cloning of humans.

Therapeutic cloning techniques on the other hand show great medical promise, and eliminate some of the ethical concerns surrounding reproductive cloning. Most importantly, therapeutic cloning does not involve the creation of a viable human clone

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The possibility of cloning does have its advantages such as cloning organs to replace or repair the damaged ones. Despite the fact of cloning having its advantages, cloning are against the basic beliefs of…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “More than 123,000 people are waiting for organ transplants. Some won’t receive a transplant in time, some suffer through years of pain and medical care before finally receiving the transplant they need, and others are rejected the opportunity of a transplant because they don’t meet the criteria. The average waiting time for a heart transplant is 4 years, a kidney transplant 5 years, and a liver transplant 11 years,” (Life Donor Program). Although theologians, politicians, preachers, and the medical community wrestle with the ethical ramifications of therapeutic cloning, the medical benefits outweigh the ethical concerns. Due to the research and technology today, scientists have learned that they are able to take stem cells from a patient and grow organs and tissue that are explicit to their own DNA so there’s no risk of rejection.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In a two part viewpoint, David A. Prentice and William Saunders discuss the science and ethics of Therapeutic cloning. In the first portion Prentice argues that creating clones for the sole purpose of embryonic stem cell research commonly known as " Therapeutic Cloning," is not very different from reproductive cloning. He also points out that therapeutic cloning is not very therapeutic for the embryo involved. In the second portion of the viewpoint, Saunders elaborates on Prentice's arguments and goes more in depth. Saunders goes as far as to point out that therapeutic cloning is barely any different than the horrific experiment practiced by the Nazis during the time of World War II.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I personally believe that cloning could be both a good and bad thing, and both sides make absolutely great points in their arguments. However, I believe that we should be able to have the choice whether or not we want to contribute to it or if we do not. Nevertheless, I think it depends on the reasoning you have for wanting and/or needing cloning done. I do believe that not all forms are ethically correct. I do agree with therapeutic cloning, as it could help people who may have cancer of a certain organ, that way they can clone the organ and just receive it instead of being put on a waiting list to find a potential match.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Creative Title What if theretheir was a way to cure humans by cloning an replica of any body part?. Therapeutic cloning is taking an embryo and extracting the nucleus and transferring it to a human. Therapeutic cloning could help people in many ways because it could help people get new organs and it could help paraplegics. Although, therapeutic cloning is a good idea reproductive cloning would leave children in foster homes.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why should we risk the life of others to create another human , if we already . I'm a strong believer that everything happens for a reason , but making something like that to happen is too far . With therapeutic cloning, we have the opportunity to save lives without putting one in danger . By trying to create another life which makes more sense . I am against reproductive and for therapeutic cloning .…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the process of therapeutic cloning? The process of therapeutic cloning is removing a nucleus from an abhorrent cell and moving the nucleus into an unfertilized egg, which develops an exact replica of the parent cell, this is then called a clone. The purpose of therapeutic cloning is to strengthen the cells within the body. With the process of therapeutic cloning this then allows the cells to cure diseases that have not been cured yet, this then would allow humanity in the future to be stronger by helping us have a more health advantage. Although, therapeutic cloning is very helpful some people are opposed to it due to the fact that it is unethical in some ways.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What´s Therapeutic Cloning?

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages

    However there are some types of people called Literalists, who take everything to be written in the bible as literally accurate, including facts like Eve and Adam were the first humans, God actually created earth in seven days, and other improbabilities. These people frequently respond to Therapeutic Cloning in ways that make artificial production of parts seem like stepping into ‘forbidden territory’. God is the only one who creates life, according to literalists. In my studies, many of the opposing arguments were written by literalists, and I feel compelled to rebut their arguments. Therapeutic cloning is, in a literal sense, creating embryos and destroying them.…

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, therapeutic cloning is something we’ve done in the past so we can improve the things we didn’t know before with our more advanced technology that we have now. Therapeutic cloning unlike reproductive…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on animal research, cloning humans would not be ethical because of health risks, and the emotional and social impact of the cloned child. Reproductive cloning is the most common cloning seen today. What is reproductive cloning? “Reproductive cloning produces a duplicate of an existing…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taxpayers money should be used to fund therapeutic cloning since it will benefit the world greatly. Cloning will allow infertile couples to have children of their own. This is one of the many ways that cloning can benefit the world. About 10% of women (6.1 million) can’t get pregnant or stay pregnant and about 15% of couples are infertile.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bioethics in Medical Research Through the recent years, there has been a lot of controversy on the topic of medical bioethics. They main topics inside of medical bioethics are cloning and gene therapy. Some people agree with cloning and gene therapy saying that it will make the world better and it will help people and society. On the other hand, some people disagree and say that this is unnatural and will mess up society.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of human cloning, such failures would result in abortions, miscarriages, or births of malformed or diseased individuals. These results are considered unacceptable by all current ethical standards (DOC: Cloning). Therapeutic cloning is a genetic material extracted from an adult cell is placed in use inside of nuclei egg, to produce the cloning gene for cures for diseases. This is true, but therapeutic cloning also involves the destruction of an embryo to treat another person, and the destruction of one person to benefit another is immoral.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Essay

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The controversy around human cloning has received a lot of news coverage. There is reproductive cloning, theraputic cloning, ect. There are many types of cloning but it is not worth funding for. Reproductive and theraputic cloning are trying to get funded by the taxpayer’s money for the people to be able to clone ourselves or other things such as pets. Any type of cloning should not be funded at all because of such disadvantages as people trying to abuse cloning technology, health risks from mutation of genes and also it is like if people are trying to play a god’s role by making another human or pets.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cloning In Frankenstein

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The main reason cloning is done is to harvest stem cells for research and for the creation of new tissues and organs. In an article by John Shea titled “What’s Wrong with Human Cloning,” he states that “the Health Department is considering…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays