John Ikenberry's International Order

Improved Essays
Understanding today’s international order is a challenging mission since key actors and relations can influence the world in which we live. Throughout a changing environment, the rationale of state actors, combined with the behavior of non-state actors, willingly or unwillingly creates and modifies the international order because these actors want to change or modify the actual order. Therefore, international orders emerge through the establishment of organizing norms of power and stability throughout states, while the international order change due to the influence of many actors. According to John Ikenberry, international order is the system of activities and relations that enable the community of states to work through norms, agreements, and institutions in formal or informal …show more content…
Ikenberry’s argument offers an excellent explanation about the reality of today’s international system because although some states could choose the type of system they live in; other more powerful states could force the type of order without taking into consideration the choices of others. One might object here that this is unjust because it is not possible that other states can set the rules of the game above others; however, be just or unjust this is the reality. States willingly or unwillingly accept an international order. Ultimately, international order emerges through stages. The first stage is when states can agree with others to decide what type of international order they want; however, when powerful states do not agree with others, the probable result is war. This is so because international order depends upon states applying its power over other states. G. John Ikenberry argues that the most important changes in international orders happen after major wars. War is the primary resort to create an international order because, after war, victorious states can set the rules and others states

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The philosophers and political researchers Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri also have a philosophical theory about a type of human interaction which extends past globalization, which they call Empire. However, it does not adopt the same generally positive and optimistic tone that Appiah takes. Instead, their view is that this tend towards increased interdependency has began the creation of a homogeneous, monolithic power structure known as Empire. At the outset, this view of power relates to Thomas Hobbes’ views about the power of the state over the governed and the contract between the governed and the centralizing governing body (Hardt 7). Hardt and Negri give credit to earlier theorists who initially extrapolated Hobbes’ theories, assigning…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defence White Papers

    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The rules-based global order promotes the belief that you must follow the status quo of order. For example, working with other states and organisations to achieve international stability and peace, nuclear non-proliferation, and preventing terrorism. They two main threats to a stable rules-based global order are weapons of mass destruction and terrorism so it is no surprise that the defence papers, especially 2016 continue to reiterate the importance of a rules-based global order. In the 2013 white paper, a rules-based global order is a key strategic interest. It lists the potential and present threats to the order including WMDs, terrorism, internal conflict and state failure.…

    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jervis argues that four possible world orders may arise out of this unique scenario: a world in which national autonomy is diminished and barriers between states disintegrate, a world in which there is more cooperation between states, yet states retain national autonomy, a world in which the United States dominates and acts freely, and a world in which a “counter-balancing coalition” is created to offset the U.S.’s power (Jervis). These four orders represent a significant departure from “traditional” international politics in that the theory that “leading powers always struggle for dominance for gain, status, or security, and are willing to use force to this end” no longer applies (Jervis). To summarize, states no longer have to worry about a fully anarchic world where they must rely on self-help, as Realists would argue.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the beginning of her speech, the audience can grasp that Ambassador Power’s perspective on international relations is primarily based on a liberalist point of view. Prior to even discussing about the threat that Russia is imposing to the United States, Ambassador Power begins her speech by stressing the fact that “some of the most rewarding and impactful work [she] has done at the UN has come in the times when [her] Russian counterpart and [her] have been able to cooperate.” This statement demonstrates that she agrees with the fact that cooperation is what leads state to attain their security; it is congruent with Scott Silverstone’s perspective on the liberal tradition. As the paper progresses, Ambassador Power’s remarks continue to fall in line with the liberal assumption that cooperation guarantees security and guides a state to attain their self-interest. For example, she states that in order to confront Russia’s attempt to divide the nations, the nation must confront the threat together by adapting and strengthening the orders to which their interests depend.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    And the cost of war should be economically accessed to determine if there are enough assets to complete the goal. Therefore, “Some political theorists have maintained that the concept itself of “justice” in warfare is irrelevant: once the state-to-state violence starts, the domain of justice is left irrevocably behind, and only force matters, until a new power equilibrium is reached, and on its foundation the domain of peacetime justice is then reestablished.” (Bess, p.…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ramesh Thakur's Essay

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    International conflict has long been an issue that has broken apart families, started wars, and resulted in the death of loved ones. While solutions to issues can be difficult to attain, it is important to stay connected to those who have differing opinions. The government is an important part of one’s life: it is influential in the way a nation is run, and vital in the protection of its people. In an effort to stay connected to other foreign countries and try to avoid dispute, the United Nations was created. An international governmental organization, the U.N. has been in existence since World War II’s decline.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iraq Immigration Analysis

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This article focuses on how an order presented by one country will lead to impact on the other country and thus influences the relationship between two countries even to a broader international view. First, it is an executive order presented by the President of the United States, Donald Trump. Different presidents stand different political positions on one issue according to the specific time periods and his ideas of governing a country. Taking foreign issue as an instance, “during the Bush administration, the United states and Iraq signed a Strategic Framework Agreement, which calls for close diplomatic, economic and security ties and is still in effect.” However, the current administration violates the agreement and executes a totally opposite order to Iraq.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Quarantine Speech

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages

    There must be a return to a belief in the pledged word, in the value of a signed treaty. There must be recognition of the fact that national morality is as vital as private morality.” “There is a solidarity and interdependence about the modern world, both technically and morally, which makes it impossible for any nation completely to isolate itself from economic and political upheavals in the rest of the world, especially when such upheavals appear to be spreading and not declining. There can be no stability or peace either within nations or between nations except under laws and moral standards adhered to by all International anarchy destroys every foundation for peace. It jeopardizes either the immediate or the future security of every nation, large or small.…

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    International organisations fall into a category of “non-state actors that exist outside the traditional levels-of-analysis framework but have a marked impact on the international system.” Each individual international organisation has its own set of principles and rules that the members must abide by. In addition, international organisations function as instruments in upholding international law, as there is no single entity responsible for this on a global scale. International organisations can be divided into different categories depending on their main priority and focus in the international community. NATO and the Warsaw Pact are examples of military and security oriented organisations.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most vital instrument of national power in the West’s interactions with the world is military might, because without the coercive efforts of their militaries none of their diplomatic polices and ideas could have effectively impacted foreign nations. Over the centuries, the one constant fact that if a nation had the desire to conquer or rule another, it needed a strong military whether that would be to coercive or protect its interests. The most ideal case of a country using its military might is no waging war, but deterring it. This occurs by finding the delicate balance of threatening nations’ security without forcing them into an arms race. Unfortunately, events show that this balance is hard to achieve, and once a nation feels too threaten…

    • 1658 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    International conflict is an unresolved issue that continually reappears in our world time after time. Conflicts, big or small, can disrupt the peace and structure of the involved nations, while possibly engaging the rest of the world in their dilemma. The result of these conflicts can cause drastic events such as wars, bombings and even genocide. These detrimental results are not always followed by international conflict but are most certainly susceptible. That is why in this paper I will analyze the topic of when nations should go to war and the role they should play in international conflict.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “History repeats itself.” is a common maxim that is not particularly accurate. Rather, history can exhibit parallels. The treaties of Vienna and Versailles show these parallels, even being a century apart. These treaties share the prominent similarity of their goals towards security, leveling, and peace throughout Europe.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Rationalist Explanations for War,” James Fearon argues that due to war’s costly nature and states’ risk-averse, or at least risk-neutral, tendencies, there should always exist some possible prewar agreement between two disputing states that both parties would prefer to achieve over committing to war. While seeking to reveal his main claim that war is caused by information problems, commitment problems, and issue indivisibilities, Fearon critiques five traditional Neorealist explanations of war: anarchy, positive expected utility, preventive war, lack of information, and miscalculation of relative power. Although Fearon’s critique of the majority of these theories are earnest and do expose multiple logical shortcomings, his rapid dismissal…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prominent in realist theory is the concept of anarchy. Anarchy in international politics is defined by Mearsheimer as a system of ‘independent political units (states) that have no central authority above them’ (Mearsheimer 1994). Such a system promotes the concepts of self-help, statism and survival which suggest that war is the result of independent states fighting for power and national interest in order to survive. Given that the world has only been at peace for 8% of all of recorded history (Hedges 2003), these concepts are of great significance to realist in order to dissect war and understand why it is so prominent in international politics. Therefore, the bases of this essay will be formed using the aforementioned concepts to outline…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Rosenau (1992) composed the first chapter of “Governance, Order, and Change in World Politics” in the aftermath of the Cold War. It was his argument that, rather than forming a world government to manage the world’s affairs, attentions should instead be focused on global governance. He also stressed that an increased level of governance would help propel the world towards a positive direction. The world faced an uncertain future following the end of the Cold War.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays