Arguments Against Trophy Hunting

Good Essays
Why Trophy hunting can be good for animal conservation efforts

This is an interesting argument and most people, (me included) find it hard to accept. I don’t like trophy hunting I cannot see why anyone would enjoy paying a large sum of money to kill an animal that has done nothing to deserve death. Frankly, the argument is counterintuitive. How can killing animals save animals from being killed? Keep an open mind. Evidence suggests that in specific situations trophy hunting can really help endangered animals. Some of the main arguments for and against trophy hunting are,
· How can killing animals help animals?
· Other factors contributing to loss of habitat(such as poaching, loss of habitat)
· Involvement of local communities
· Involvement
…show more content…
This is hard to argue because should it? Locals don’t help out because they have their own lives to live and families to feed so why should they have to protect animals that can sometimes actually be a negative part of their lives. There is a solution to this problem. Give some the money from trophy hunting to local land owners. In South Africa a portion of the proceeds from trophy hunting goes directly to local land owners. This incentivises them to give animals space to live on and makes them protect the animals from poachers. One third of South African white rhinos now live on private land. White rhino populations have gone from just a few hundred at the beginning of the twentieth century to more than 18,000 in 2016. This is brilliant new because it shows how these incentives work and are protecting animals

Some African nations have taken advantage of trophy hunting and use it to aid conservation. In 2006 Combined 10 African nations (South Africa, Namibia, Tanzania, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Zambia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Ethiopia, Burkina Faso) gained 202 million dollars in revenue was collected from trophy hunting. This created lots of money and some was used to aid conservation. This also creates thousands of new jobs and oppertunities to otherwise impoverished people.
In Namibia revenue from trophy hunting is the main source of revenue they have for wildlife
…show more content…
But when you look at the data we see gtaht our perception of trophy hunting as a monstrous activity could actually be harmful towards animal populations. When we accept that it is not the main cause of animal death and can actually bring economic growth to regions that desperately need it we can start to do something about it. We should be angry that African nations are not restricting exports of horn and tusk gained though poaching. The people pay to kill animals will be used to help save more animals. That is a hard fact to accept, another is the fact that a full ban on trophy hunting would actually be devastating for animals and for locals. Local communities rely on breeding these animals and protecting them helps them grow. Trophy hunting can be good for

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many people say that hunting is bad because hunters kill off wild animals and cause them to go extinct, but that is not necessarily true. Hunters actually keep the population of wild animals at a steady pace. If people did not hunt, it could cause over population. This would then lead to fewer resources for…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The same applies for all the other methods. Therefore, despite the futile efforts by mammalogists to justify their inhuman nature depicted in the killing of animals, the question still remains to be answered regarding the killing of animals. Other researchers have articulated that killing of animals, especially wild animals, could be beneficial. This is because the act helps in reducing the damages on the environment that is caused by these animals, increase in wildlife value, and increased willingness for landowners to tolerate damages by wild animals and removing animals from the general populations before they die (Conover, 529). However, these advantages are hard to quantify or rather measure especially when comparing the act with the suggested benefit.…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Importance Of Hunting

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Importance of Hunting The majority of our society does not understand the importance of the act of hunting. Hunting keeps the wildlife population at equilibrium between their natural lifestyle and our civilization to aid agricultural farmers. The problem is those who oppose hunting do not think it is ethical, and those who hunt more for fun rather than putting food on the table for their families. The truth of the matter is that hunting is a major part of protecting wildlife from overpopulation, disease, and overgrazing farm land. Though that’s not all, a species could starve to death if the population is not at a steady level.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The basic justification behind trophy hunting is that it raises funds for conservation. However, in relationships between people and nature we just are not very good at predicting the outcomes of our actions . Trophy hunting rare and endangered species does not guarantee the safety of that species. While it is only a couple animals, it still results in decreasing the population and gene pool of that species. If trophy hunting only occurred on invasive or overpopulated animals, there would be no need to worry about the overall affects on the population as much.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So many people currently make their living off animal industries that it would be difficult to suddenly shift away from those products. The documentary was not thorough in explaining how to end animal agriculture altogether. There did not appear to be any proposals for making change, but they did at least successfully raise awareness for the harm in consuming meat. The argument against home farming was tenuous, as it predominantly appealed to emotion, showing the horror of killing an animal yourself rather than actually proving it is unsustainable. I think home farming could be a suitable alternative to large scale animal agriculture.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What I have concluded is that we should hunt because of conservation, fresh food, and family traditions. These all play a vital role in why we should hunt. Many of the opposing sides argument was that hunting is inhumane, not safe, and why we should not eat meat. I feel like these organizations have their own opinions and claims, but never want to pull out facts when talking about the subject. When looking at the benefits of hunting, they outweigh the negatives often used in propaganda against hunters and hunting.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Importance Of Hunting

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages

    People need to hunt to survive. If the government passed the law to take away guns then how would certain people provide meet for their family? People rely on hunting for food, hunting keeps families from starving in the winter time. Just having that extra meet from the animal helps so much and it goes a long…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    137). There will always be a lone animal looking for a place to start a family because it is ingrained in the animal’s instinct; the problem is not having enough territory. By killing the established pack of predators, the predator control program opens up a new home for traveling mating pairs that were looking for an unoccupied territory to form a new family. Moreover, if predator control programs are successful in killing the native predators, the program is usually forced to introduce new predators to control the increase in herbivore populations caused by the lack of native predators. After a while, the predator control program must use predator control methods to manage the introduced species which “are a greater threat to native biodiversity than pollution, harvest, and disease combined” (Simberloff).…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hunters often argue that they are “saving” the animal populations, but these attitudes tend to be hypocritical. It is often asked how it can be said that by killing what we have left is saving it. A quote by an animal conservationist says it best with the words, “Hunters kill any animal they would like to hang over the fireplace, including healthy animals who are needed to keep the population strong (“Animal Population Control”).” If nature were to be left alone, the exquisite balance of nature’s ecosystems would ensure the survival and regulation of most species, but when humans get involved, everything changes. However, if humans must intervene to keep the animal population under control, then there are several methods that could be practiced that are not only effective and efficient, but also morally sound. While animal overpopulation is undeniably happening, ways to solve the problematic animal populations can be regulated without the use of guns.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In conclusion, killing animal have both advantages and disadvantages. Advantages of killing animals are used for food, out of suffering, and dangerous animals. These reasons are the important point that we can kill animals for surviving and helping them. In contrast, we should not kill animals for these following reasons: the cruel thing, the animal extinction, and contrast to religion. In my opinion, killing animals is not appropriate.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays