Big Game Hunting Persuasive Essay

Imagine a world where there is no rare or unique animals, rapidly declining food numbers, and countries brought to poverty due to animal extinction. Well, thankfully, there is no need to worry about that reality, due to big game trophy hunting. Big game trophy hunting should be allowed because it keeps animal populations at a reasonable level, it provides nourishment to the populous, and it enriches Africa’s economy.. Initially, big game trophy hunting should be allowed because it controls the animal population. Without big game hunting, there would be an overpopulation of animals, such as the deer. Steve West claims, “Hunters are realists who understand that an exotic or endangered animal is more likely to be protected from extinction if they are assigned a financial value”(Article 1).This shows that hunters actually control the population by putting a price on the head of the animal. This further prohibits anyone and everyone from hunting the endangered animals. Some may argue that big game trophy hunting kills more animals than it saves, however with the financial …show more content…
Africa is known for being a less developed country, with less income than first world countries. Big game trophy hunting closes that economical gap. As the author states, “Citation 1”. *Put Explanation Here*. Some may argue that this wealth is just restitution for killing off the precious wildlife of the location. On the contrary, there are many government officials who encourage hunting, due to the fact that most wildlife hunted can pose a problem to the people. That wealth is reason enough to allow big game trophy hunting. In summation, big game trophy hunting should be allowed because it keeps the animal population in check, provides an invaluable food resource, and contributes to the economy of Africa. Without big game trophy hunting, the aforementioned reality could be true. This hunting is more helpful than people may