Trophy Hunt Research Paper

Improved Essays
Grizzly bear trophy hunts are well controlled, and do not threatened the bears continued existence in British Columbia. Over the years management programs have ensure the safety of the species with all different kinds of means. The grizzly bear trophy hunts are well controlled by programs such as limited entry hunting, which controls the number of authorized hunters in an area (Ministry of Environment, 2010, pg.1). Limited hunting entries are controlled by the government that does not allow trophy hunting in areas if the population is not at a sustainable level and only allows human-caused mortality levels to be at a maximum of 6%. This 6% also ensures that the grizzly bears existence is not threatened in British Columbia. These bears existence …show more content…
Trophy hunting grizzly bears, even through the government claims it is controlled and does not threaten the species, actually might. The grizzly bears have been exterminated from large areas in the province (Gailus, Moola, & Connolly, 2010, pg.6). This is not a result of trophy hunts, but from habitat degradation which the government has not accounted for over the years. This has lead to 9% of the province to be classed as “threatened” and could lead to the bears to be endangered in fewer than 50 years (Gailus, Moola, & Connolly, 2010, pg.6-7). Grizzly bears are protected in many areas because they are either threatened there or it is a protected area, but the bears still die there because of “authorized hunters” (approx. 550 grizzly bears in the past 50 years) (Gailus, Moola, & Connolly, 2010, pg. 12-13). Most people who live in British Columbia also believe that trophy hunting for grizzly bears is morally indefensible and should be banned across either the province or in parks and protected areas (Gailus, Moola, & Connolly, 2010, pg.9-10). The bears are skinned for their fur, and then left. A majority of the bear is not used and is therefore unethical and immoral. 
 Overall, grizzly bear trophy hunting is argued to be controlled and not threatening to the species, but also, a threat and morally unethical. In conclusion, grizzly bears should not be trophy hunted. I believe this because even though the government and wildlife protection groups claim that it will not become a threat, they do not account for everything. It is also immoral and unethical. Grizzly bears are hunted for their furs and photos and then disposed of and not used for a majority of the animal which is cruel and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    National Park Environment

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The people living around Yellowstone National Park say the wolves are ranging out of the confines of the park and entering the nearby towns causing a concern for the safety of the residents that reside there. It’s understandable for families, especially with small children, to want the wolves removed because the potential harm the wolves could inflict on a small child. Also, cattle ranchers are worried about the wolves making an easy meal on all of the cattle. The cattle are the means of survival for some people living in Wyoming and to lose everything all to wolves can be a scary thought. Wolves are naturally aggressive animals but, being aggressive is how they have survived for thousands of years.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Timothy Treadwell Wasn’t a Hero He Was a Preventable Tragedy Grizzly Bears are ferocious, furry creatures that may appear to be soft and cuddly but come armed with sharp claws, and huge teeth. The males can weigh up to 600 pounds and the females can weigh up to 440 pounds. Every year in North America alone there are at least three fatalities of humans who are mauled by bears. According to Boy Scouts of America the best advice to prevent attacks from Grizzly Bears is to avoid them all together. If someone must travel through the habitat of a bear it is safest to travel in a large group so the animal will think that it is encountering a larger animal instead of individual humans.…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deer Research Paper

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Even if they are following the rules, they can kill a lot of deer. Many states regulate that only one antlered buck can be harvested per year, however that leaves room for five does to be shot. If a lot of does are shot, and only bucks are around, it limits how many deer are available to reproduce. Currently, this is legal, even though it can lead to excessive deer being killed. Several hunters are not the actual landowners, thus meaning they need to obtain permission before hunting.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animals don’t deserve to be tested or harm in anyway because they didn’t do anything. Animals should have at least some rights so we can improve how animals are abused, tested, and disrespected by humans. Would you want your pet to be taken away for testing? Would you want to watch the brutality of it? If not, then why let another animal go through this.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The banning of these dogs is called Breed Specific Legislation, or BSL. Although many countries have outlawed certain dog breeds, entire breeds should not be banned because dogs are products of their environment, dogs can be harmless in nature, and banning an entire breed does not enhance public safety.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Is Hunting Safe for Deer? The organization, IDA also known as In Defense of Animals, believes that hunting causes problems for the environment and for the deer that are being killed, while other people argue that hunting causes no problems for deer. IDA’s arguments suggest that hunters only kill for sport, and kill too many deer. They also suggest that deer do not have capabilities of defending themselves when a hunter has a firearm at hand. In order to stop the negativity of organizations like the IDA, laws have been put into place.…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grey Wolf Pros And Cons

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The DNR has programs in place to effectively eliminate nuisance animals, to include the grey wolf if determine a problem. So why is it necessary to make this issue about hunting? The need for hunting game for sport to eliminate a nuisance animals is clearly not the answer, and the government does not have the authority to side step the voter’s rights. I feel that this both Public Act 520 and 21 should never have happen. Michigan relishes in its natural resources, it is a sense of pride for Michiganders.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Banning Pitbulls

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This restriction on pit bulls is called Breed-Specific Legislation, or BSL. There are “about 200 cities and towns… [that] restrict or prohibit ownership of certain breeds of dogs” (Mott). This new epidemic of pit bull attacks has caused certain cities to ban the ownership of them. Apparently, “in Tijeras, New Mexico, there is a pit bull ban that says animal controllers can kill a pit bull on sight without talking to the owner”(Bastian). This should not be the way it is handled, because now over half of the dogs euthanized are pit bulls (O’Connor).…

    • 1719 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Importance Of Hunting

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Importance of Hunting The majority of our society does not understand the importance of the act of hunting. Hunting keeps the wildlife population at equilibrium between their natural lifestyle and our civilization to aid agricultural farmers. The problem is those who oppose hunting do not think it is ethical, and those who hunt more for fun rather than putting food on the table for their families. The truth of the matter is that hunting is a major part of protecting wildlife from overpopulation, disease, and overgrazing farm land. Though that’s not all, a species could starve to death if the population is not at a steady level.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, animals do not exhibit human diseases such as HIV, Alzheimer's disease and many more. Therefore, it sounds useless to think that testing drugs to these diseases using animals will give accurate results (Slattery & Cryan, 2012). Apart from this, using these animals as test subjects also greatly violates the animal rights, because animals just like humans have feelings and deserve to be treated right. However, if not for the use of these animals, the medicine world would be stagnant. However, the use of animals as testing subjects should be banned, because it greatly invades animals’ rights and puts the animals through a lot of pain and suffering.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays