Torture Pros And Cons

Superior Essays
od 2 Is the use of torture reasonable to use against suspected terrorists or war criminals? Torture is the action or practice of causing extreme pain on someone as a punishment or to force them to say or do something, in rare cases torture is used for the pleasure of the one inflicting the pain. Although is sounds pretty harsh and not very human, 67% of Americans think that torture is appropriate to use on suspected terrorist and war criminals. The use of torture against these people would not just be done because of who they are, but because they have information that could take or save the lives of many innocent people. Torture is needed, to extract this information from the enemy. Torture is the use of extreme physical or psychological …show more content…
The use of torture can completely ruin the image of one's country, which can make other people or countries lose respect, or even disrespect them. If America starts using torture, it would put us on the same level as all of those horrible countries in the Middle-East, that are mostly looked down upon. Torture also has some long term effects. It is believed that after using torture strategies, the person who is doing the torturing can obtain a very guilty conscious. In some cases, the people doing the torturing have committed suicide, because they cannot cope with what they have done Torturing suspected terrorist could also cause very serious aggravation from the nation or group that the terrorist is from or orchestrated in. This aggravation could cause riots, or even determine other countries or terrorist to harm the United …show more content…
In a poll that was taken between March 22-28 of 2016, approximately 35% of Americans believed that the use of torture on suspected terrorist is “often necessary”. In the same poll, around 28% of Americans believed that torture is “sometimes necessary”, depending on the suspected plans that the certain terrorist holds. Along with these numbers, 14% of Americans think that torture is “rarely necessary” to use on these people. Believe it or not, only about 23% of Americans said that they do not believe torture is ever necessary under any situation. In these numbers, 82% of the members of the Republican party thought that torture was at least “rarely necessary”. The members of the Democratic party, however, shared a lot different thoughts, saying that only 48% of them though that torture was ever necessary at

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Summary: The Term Torture

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Merriam Webster defines torture as the act of causing severe physical pain as a form of punishment or as a way to force someone to do or say something. Moreover, there are international instruments which define the term torture. For example, a very broad definition of torture has been presented…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When hearing about torture, whether on the news or in an article, we as Americans do not consider the lasting effects it has on people. Physical and psychological torture is mainly employed as war tactics, to get information out of people. Torture is not a concept that is talked about on a day to day basis, because of the many freedoms we experience as Americans. In the article The Case for Torture, Michael Levin portrays torture as something that should be permissible.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dialawar Torture Effects

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Dialawar was an Afghan detainee who was beaten,sleep deprived and chained up for 5 unrelenting days until he died. However, it was later discovered that Dilawar had no connection to the rocket attack that he was apprehended for. ( No torture,2008). Due to the C.I.A.’s misidentification of who Dilawar was mistaken for his last days were horrible and unjust. Unfortunately, the damage was already done.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The best Way to Deal with Terrorists Is it really necessary to torture or make people suffer just to get stuff that we need from them? After reading “The Case for Torture” by Dr. Michael Levin, I disagree with torturing terrorists to gain information. I am totally against with torture or punish terrorists because first, most terrorists are forced to act in the way they do, they have no power over their actions. Secondly, it is possible to transform the bad feelings inside them to a good one, I believe everyone deserves a second chance.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Within the media one of the stories that is told is the president holding too much power. The president has the power to do things that past presidents would never dream of. Making calls, and going about their agenda right under congress, and the judiciary branch. In this paper, we will examine some of the ways that the president has become more of a monarchial president, and look at some examples of the power the president has slowly gained.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture is used entirely to thwart future terrorist attacks. Justification of torture can be examined best in what is known as the “Ticking Time Bomb Scenario”. The ticking time bomb scenario is a thought experiment that has been used in the ethics debate over whether torture can ever be justified. As a thought experiment, there is no need that the scenario be plausible, it need only serve to highlight ethical considerations. The scenario can be formulated as follows:…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout history torture has broadened from the Roman crucifixion (now out of date) to…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Debate Analysis

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torture is now easier to justify in the context of the war on terror. Many opinions may arise when looking at whether or not we should torture potential terrorists and since there is not an actual strategy to proceed along when looking at it, the question still remains unanswered. The debate began after the incident in 9/11 had occurred and the government implemented several anti terrorism measures where justification was placed under the veil of Unitarianism. In the article “The torture debate” by Phillip Rumney and Martin O’Boyle they provide readers with complementary views on whether or not legalized systems of torture would be worth having. The authors also emphasize the issues that could result from having a torture of system since it could come with many implications.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the only way to save the citizen’s lives is to subject the terrorist to the most excruciating possible pain, how can we not do so? Is torturing the terrorist unconstitutional? Most likely. But millions of lives definitely outweigh constitutionality. Is torture a barbaric practice?…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jacob barrett Mr. Ricci November 4, 2014 Ap English Is Torture Necessary For the United States In the debate on torture in the United states, it is the widely believed that torture is a reasonable way to obtain information. The United Nations Convention for discussing Torture passed in 1994, torture to be defined as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person” in order to collect information or to punish the person “for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or for the intimidation to coercing him or a third person for any reason.” Torture in most situations is both time sensitive and necessary to save lives along with that…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How do you determine if and when the use of torture would be ethical? Let’s begin by examining the views of two well-known philosophers John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Each of these philosophers had strong opinions and stances on the moral and ethical use of torture. John Stuart Mills’ theory on the ethical of the use of torture is that it is acceptable if it brings happiness and/or pleasure to the majority of people than if the torture were not carried out. One example he gives to support that theory is, if a terrorist has information that will prevent an act of terror that would result in the death of hundreds of innocent people and by obtaining this information thru an act of torture, it would likely save those lives he would agree…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Is Wrong To Torture

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Interrogating one man can help reveal additional information to help foil any other possible plans the terrorist may have up his sleeves. In addition the utilitarian principle still applies in this situation. In fact, it is even more justifiable, because the torturer only places one person in pain. Not only do you get to save more lives, but torturing someone only causes them temporary physical pain. Killing thousands is permanent damage.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Torture is generally ineffective, effects those subjected to it for the remainder of their lives, and is unacceptable no matter the reason. Consider the United Nations, what it is and what it stands for. The United Nations wrote and signed something known as the Geneva Conventions. The Geneva Conventions explicitly state in article 3 that, “humane treatment is required for all people in enemy hands. The use of murder, mutilation, torture, and the use of humiliating or degrading treatment is prohibited.”…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays