Osama Bin Laden Research Paper

Improved Essays
Torture as an Anti-Terrorist Strategy In 2005, the Detainee Treatment act was passed, which banned the military from engaging in torture as well as requiring the International Committee of the Red Cross to have access to prisoners being held by the U.S. government. In June of 2015, Senate voted to expand this law to prevent the military and all other government agencies from using torture during interrogations of prisoners, codifying a ban President Barack Obama issued by executive order shortly after he was sworn in. The use of torture has been a hot topic for the past several years, mainly because of its use by the Bush administration and the intelligence gained through torture eventually leading us to finding Osama Bin Laden. Many try …show more content…
There were no laws in the early 2000’s, like there are now, to hold back the Bush Administration from using EITs (enhanced interrogation) and there were actually some regulations supporting President Bush in his endeavors to find Osama Bin Laden through the use of EITs. The Military Commissions Act of 2006, for example, authorized the President to conduct military tribunals of enemy combatants and to hold them indefinitely without judicial review under the terms of habeas corpus, which is an order to bring a jailed person before a judge or court to find out if that person should really be in jail. It also ruled that, “Testimony coerced through humiliating or degrading treatment would be admissible in the tribunals”. Unfortunately, this didn’t last long because the U.S. Field Manuals on Counterinsurgency and Human Intelligence Collector Operations, released later that same year, which stated that, “no person in the custody or under the control of DOD, regardless of nationality or physical location, shall be subject to torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, in accordance with and as defined in U.S. law.” This means, however, that the government had several years where torture was at the height of use before its downward …show more content…
Torture is used entirely to thwart future terrorist attacks. Justification of torture can be examined best in what is known as the “Ticking Time Bomb Scenario”. The ticking time bomb scenario is a thought experiment that has been used in the ethics debate over whether torture can ever be justified. As a thought experiment, there is no need that the scenario be plausible, it need only serve to highlight ethical considerations. The scenario can be formulated as follows: Suppose that a person with knowledge of an imminent terrorist attack, that will kill many people, is in the hands of the authorities and that he will disclose the information needed to prevent the attack only if he is tortured. Should he be tortured? It’s like the phrase, “you can’t make an omelet without breaking a few eggs”. In a world where terrorists will do anything it takes to kill Americans, shouldn’t Americans be allowed to do anything it takes to protect themselves? This is the reason for EITs, the purpose - to protect the American

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anne Applebaum states in “The Torture Myth”, that America has operated under the false pretense that torture is a viable option for obtaining information, and because terrorists are malicious, so America needs more aggression to win. She argues that torture hurts the country more than it benefits. Torture…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “ticking time bomb” scenario is arguably the most used justification for the use of torture. The problem with this scenario is that it is based solely on the discretion of the intelligence official. This policy addresses the idea of discretion as both the ability to make a decision and the ability to govern in terms of policymaking. Theodore J. Lowi in his article Legitimizing Public Administration: A Disturbed Dissent talks about where the constitutional ability to use discretion lies. He contends that discretion lies in the hands Congress first and foremost (Lowi, 1993, p. 263).…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The government is known to do controversial actions when it comes to interrogation. The most controversial tactic is torture treatment. Torture treatment has always been around, but there have always been issues with it. The main issue is, is it constitutional? The eighth amendment states that no one is subject to cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture. She believes if some torture is considered to be OK all torture will be considered OK. To be more specific, if they make exceptions for some circumstances, then it’ll be hard to justify between what is right and wrong. She also mentioned that the ticking time bomb situation was highly improbable. Young is a pragmatist, she understands that there is no right answer to the situation but in this case she wants to preserve America's core…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Before exploring potential policy implications, this memo will first identify the key issues, based upon Pfiffner’s article, that set the conditions for torture and abuse. First, Pfiffner proposes that the most compelling justification for torture and abuse was the “ticking time bomb” scenario (Pfiffner, 2005 p. 316). He describes this scenario in the as a sequence of events. Essentially torture is justifiable if there is an imminent planned attack, the captive knows of said attack, torture is the only method of obtaining information, captive must be persuaded to give up information, the information must be precise and if information is obtained, there must be sufficient time to utilize said information to prevent the imminent attack (Pfiffner,…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Waterboarding is defined in Webster’s dictionary as “an interrogation technique in which water is forced into a detainee’s mouth and nose as to induce the sensation of drowning” (Merriam-Webster, 2014). It is performed to obtain information that can be useful to the interrogator in the furtherance of his/her goals. The use of waterboarding as an interrogation technique was first documented in the 14th century. It involved the use of water to induce confessions as a “normal incident of law” (Weiner, 2007). President George W. Bush first approved the use of waterboarding against alleged September 11th terrorist attacks plotter Khalid Sheik Mohammed in 2003.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The enhanced interrogation techniques were used after 9/11 to gain intelligence and information from the Al Qaeda prisoners. These unconventional interrogations were used “at secret locations on military bases in regions from Asia to Eastern Europe” (Esposito and Ross). The interrogation techniques include the attention grab, the attention slap, the belly slap, long time standing, the cold cell, and water boarding.…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: Extraordinary rendition is a practice that has been apparent in its violations to human rights, including the right to due process and the right not to be subjected to torture. Over the past few decades this practice has been garnering greater attention and has put pressure on countries such as the United States. This practice generally implies that suspects are transferred from their country in which they were detained to a country that has less strict laws. The transferred suspects have no access to the judicial system of the sending state to challenge their transfer.…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Torture Good Or Bad

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    (Wikipedia). Giving false information leads to a waste of valuable time and nothing will be gained in torture especially with ruthless torturers. These torturers want to hear anything and will accept it as the truth and that they have gained knowledge, not knowing the real situation. Along with false confessions being produced, false arrests are also being made. 30 months following 911, authorities relied on intelligence (a.k.a. torture) and arrested 5,000 terror…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Water Torture

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The issue of whether or not torture is an effective and appropriate means of extracting information from subjects has been pondered for centuries. More so than ever before, the interrogation tactics used by the CIA after September 11, 2001 have been the subject of intense scrutiny. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on 9/11, the CIA ramped up its efforts to acquire human intelligence information deemed vital to United States national security. The compelling need to acquire information important to national security was not adequately balanced against the need to respect basic human rights. Further, the highly controversial interrogation methods employed on potential suspects linked to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin’s hypothetical leads to the illogical “A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during certain situations in the United States. One of the ways Levin tries to logically prove his argument is by citing different real life situations; some examples are situations that actually occurred, but most are hypothetical situations. The use of hypothetical situations is meant to help direct the reader to understand the applications of Levin’s policy on torture. With that, Levin is not convincing in his argument as he relies too heavily on the hypothetical. Michael Levin in “A Case For Torture” is not logically convincing in his discussion as to why…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Torture And Interrogation

    • 1341 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Is torture acceptable? Is it effective? Many Americans are asking these questions in response to the American Government recently issuing its first open admission to the use of torture in pursuit of intelligence. Torture has historically involved inflicting physical pain until the individual if willing to cooperate but in recent decades the use of psychological, or “no-touch”, torture has become the go to interrogation method when trying to persuade enemy combatants to cooperate (Welch, 2009)). Due to this “no-touch” method it is hard for human rights organizations to prosecute this new form of “interrogation” as torture.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Should anyone be able to strap a potential informant “to a board with his feet above his head, his mouth and nose covered,[and pour water] over his face” (”Is Torture Effective”) in order to extract information or destroy “entire villages...to kill just a few enemies”("Napalm use in Vietnam")? Imagine being in one of these situations; on the other hand, imagine being saved from a deadly attack because of information given by a tortured prisoner or finally feeling safe because a dangerous terrorist was killed in the destruction of a town. There is a fine line between morally just and unjust actions during wars and people are polarized when it comes to whether or not the U.S. should practice them. Although the use of illegal/questionable military…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This rationalizing might seem disheartening, even to some, unimagined, but at the time of the war in Iraq, employees of the United States Army and the CIA, Central Intelligence Agency allegedly perpetrated a number of 'human rights violations against detainees in the Abu Ghraib Prison in Iraq (“Abu Ghraib Torture and Prisoner Abuse”). These violations 'included physical and sexual abuse, torture, rape, sodomy, and murder. Did the ticking time bomb scenario of extreme circumstances warrant the use of torture at Abu Ghraib? There were no legal grounds presented to justify the claim of torture because no circumstances whatsoever may be used to justify the use of torture.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays