Kenneth Waltz Essay

Improved Essays
Kenneth Waltz was one of the most highly regarded political theorists of our time. He is fondly remembered for his contribution in the form of major works to the field of International Relations- Man, the State and War (1959), Theory of International Politics (1979) and The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May be Better (1981). However, his greatest legacy to the field of International Politics was his study that facilitated the revival/resurrection of realism. Realism is the objective study of global phenomena and behavioral patterns of state and non-state actors in the international realm. It attributes raison d’état to state behavior and justifies real-time state actions by connoting self-interest and survival to all state actions.
The three core principles of
…show more content…
Stateism offers a state-centric view of international relations by establishing the modern-nation state as the only determining factor of global politics. Survival, on the other hand, …show more content…
The ‘evidence’ on which it was based was not a systematic body of evidence and analysis, but rather sets of religious or philosophical speculations.
Theory of International Politics grounded realism by offering a structural account of the international system and the concept of systemic constraints. He acknowledged the inadequacy of Morgenthau’s analysis of human behaviour and revised a systemic approach to study shifts in state behaviour. Waltz characterized the international system using two concepts that have derived significance by realists in understanding state behaviour in the international

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Pros Of Constructivism

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The constructivist turn in IR marks a shift from the material determinants of international politics to ideational factors, such as beliefs, ideas, and norms. The two dominant theoretical schools in IR, neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism (NLI), share several key assumptions regarding the anarchic nature of the international system, states are self-interested, rational actors, driven by material interests in power/survival (neorealists) or security (NLI). In addition, neorealism and NLI both rely on a rational choice framework borrowed from microeconomics that assumes cost-benefit analysis and utility maximization as the impetus behind state’s political calculus. Although conditioned by the same assumptions, neorealists and NLI reach vastly different conclusions regarding the potential for conflict and cooperation in international politics.…

    • 2158 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He examines the most prominent international relations theories including realism, liberalism,…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Louisiana Purchase International relations is driven by many things with those things being theories, these theories then for the international events that in turn formed the modern state system that is in place today. The Louisiana Purchase was an even that occurred mainly between France and The United States with some relations with Spain. The Louisiana Purchase and the realist point of view it was completed from was one of the many events that helped formed today’s modern state system. The Louisiana Purchase was a deal between France and The United States that led to the exchange of a large portion of land in the Western hemisphere. France explored the land around the Mississippi River and settled in many different places around the region…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jervis argues that four possible world orders may arise out of this unique scenario: a world in which national autonomy is diminished and barriers between states disintegrate, a world in which there is more cooperation between states, yet states retain national autonomy, a world in which the United States dominates and acts freely, and a world in which a “counter-balancing coalition” is created to offset the U.S.’s power (Jervis). These four orders represent a significant departure from “traditional” international politics in that the theory that “leading powers always struggle for dominance for gain, status, or security, and are willing to use force to this end” no longer applies (Jervis). To summarize, states no longer have to worry about a fully anarchic world where they must rely on self-help, as Realists would argue.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    International anarchy is widely recognized as the fundamental element in the theory of realism. Under such an environment, states are the main players and are eager to seek for security and profits as international institution have minimal impacts on the global political system. Without the restraint from a well-established international law, the relationship between states becomes tenser and tenser as unreliability and sharp vigilance lead to eventual security dilemma, a state of chaos in which cooperation is unlikely to take place and the only option is to launch a war. Likewise, the background of the simulation game by Brock F. Tessman is known as the mini version of an anarchic international system where a state’s interest often comes into…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Joey Baughan Introduction to International Relations Paul McCartney March 25, 2015 Theory Paper Theories are the way people view things, like realism, constructivism, and liberalism. In the United States government, using every theory is essential to problem solving and understanding. When people look at something the way something truly is, and find a way to deal with it, is realism. When people use their own experiences to better understand something is constructivism. When people view things in which things need to change to get progress, is liberalism.…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nation-state forces their dominant group's culture on their territory and oppress the remaining. Most nation-states’ have had groups on their territory not considered capable of belonging and were either denied citizenship or forced to go through the process of cultural assimilation in order to “belong”. Trying to transcend the tension between universalism and particularism has only led to the people's own oppression. Which in time, has made them the nation they are today. Castles believes the nation-state model is outdated and does not belong in the age of globalization and citizenship.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realists do not believe that the states should achieve in perpetual peace and harmony in the world. Actors needed to be faced with the fact that the world is a diverse place and one must accept and live by it. Power to them is the centerpiece of a political life ensuring one’s safety in an environment with no central government protecting them from others. On the other hand, liberalists argue that realism is an outdated justification where the increase of globalization, the rise of communication technology and international trade are resources that cannot be relied on militaristic power. It is the international system that offers a collaboration within the political actors and states.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism and the End of the Cold War by William C. Wohlforth argues that Modern realism began in a reaction to the breakdown in the post-World War One international order. Wohlforth’s main ideology is realism and states how the rise and fall of realism has taken place, but stresses that international world events cannot weaken or destroy the realist ideology. The collapse of the great power cooperation helped emerge realism to be a dominant position in international relations. The central question presented in this article looks to seek to ask, did the rapid decline and peaceful collapse of the Soviet State, along with the postwar international order, discredit the realist approach? However, Wohlforth believes that.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genocides have been studied throughout history as deliberately killing a group of people based on their racial identities. The question that arises is why do people commit such crimes against innocent people based on their race or religion? The two international relation theories that relate to atrocities such as genocides is realism and constructivism. Although, genocides can describe the social construct of how idea has shifted over time, the realist perspective best explains the decision making and overall selfishness of countries committing or overall reaction to genocides.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism And The Cold War

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Prominent in realist theory is the concept of anarchy. Anarchy in international politics is defined by Mearsheimer as a system of ‘independent political units (states) that have no central authority above them’ (Mearsheimer 1994). Such a system promotes the concepts of self-help, statism and survival which suggest that war is the result of independent states fighting for power and national interest in order to survive. Given that the world has only been at peace for 8% of all of recorded history (Hedges 2003), these concepts are of great significance to realist in order to dissect war and understand why it is so prominent in international politics. Therefore, the bases of this essay will be formed using the aforementioned concepts to outline…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The distribution of power is known as a hegemony and categorizes states in either dominating powers, middle powers, or small powers. The main strength of realism is the fact that law and ethics are separated, therefore a state does not rely on its morals in order to make an executive decision. The possibility of a situation getting out of control and resulting in war is a major weakness in realism, because when states perceive attacked they will become defensive and try to strike first- which leads to…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Realism contains certain core principles that can be applied to the Melian Dialogue. These include ideas such as a static, unchanging world in which there exists a constant struggle for power, and on the international stage this struggle exists between nation states. Evil remains steadfast in the world as well, ever affecting the political and social realm. This constant struggle for power equates to endless competition between states making peace an unobtainable illusion with a moderated or controlled peace the only realistic solution. In addition to these principles, Max Weber’s work promotes philosophies of realism also identifiable in the Dialogue.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories can help simplify the complexities of international politics. Theories help create an abstract understanding and an explanation of why and how the states behave. Realism, liberalism, and constructivism all have different perspectives of how the states should operate, but not one of those theories is more accurate than the other or explains the real world problems. I organized this paper based on the most famous theories: realism,liberalism, and constructivism along with their core perceptions of the world and their criticism following regards them through other lenses.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, a huge number of literature and institutions focusing on IR have appeared since World War One. (Wright, 1995) This was the beginning of disciplinary study of international relations. Since then, IR has been successfully establishing its position in academic society, and its development has been traditionally seen as a “response to events/changes in the real world” (Brown and Ainley 2009: 19). For instance, “liberal institutionalism” appeared as a response to World War One, but soon after it was challenged and replaced by “realism”, which emerged, mainly because the former failed to explain the cause of uninterrupted aggressions by Germany, Italy and Japan.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays