Arizona Judicial System Case Study

Improved Essays
A.

Arizona 's plural executives have a clear line of succession. The plural executives of Arizona are, listed in order of succession, the Governor, Secretary of State, Attorney General, Treasurer, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction (RioLearn. (n.d.). Structure, Term, and Qualifications. Retrieved January 15, 2016). Arizona also has two additional members of its plural executive, but they are not included in the line of succession. They are the State Mine Inspector, and the five members of the Corporate Commission (RioLearn. (n.d.). Other Executive Offices. Retrieved January 15, 2016).

The governor has a variety of duties. One of which is being the commander-in-chief of Arizona 's military forces, or the Arizona National Guard. The governor can utilize these forces for the protection of Arizona 's citizens. This power ceases when the National Guard is activated by the President of the United States
…show more content…
Level 1 is limited jurisdiction. This would consist of local, municipal, and Justice Courts. These courts tend to handle local matters and municipal violations. Municipal courts also handle a lot of misdemeanor violations of state law that took place within their jurisdiction. Justice Courts oversee a broad range of civil cases as well as hold preliminary hearings for many felony cases. Level 2 is the Superior Court. The Superior Court is able to oversee most cases within Arizona. Felonies, large lawsuits, and divorce cases are among the types of cases handled by the Superior Court. The Superior Court also has some appellate function for lower court decisions. Level 3 jurisdiction is the Appellate Courts and the Supreme Court. The Court of Appeals will hear appeals from lower courts. The Supreme Court of Arizona is the highest court when it comes to state law. Their decisions cannot be appealed, unless the matter involves the US Constitution (RioLearn. (n.d.). The Judicial Branch. Retrieved January 15,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Federal Court system has three levels: the District Courts, the Courts of Appeal and the Supreme Court. NV judges are elected by the people. In contrast, federal judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The election of judges in NV creates a conflict of interest with the public in whom they sit in judgment. Judges must raise money in order to fund their election.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They consider appeals from Alabama’s municipal courts as well as appeals from misdemeanor and felony cases. The Supreme Court of Alabama is Alabama’s highest court. The Supreme Court of Alabama has jurisdiction to consider appeals from Alabama’s lower courts. This court consists of 8 associate justices and 1 chief justice.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Commander-in-ChiefThe President is the final authority in military matters and ultimately is responsible for the entire military might of the United State. Foreign AffairsThe President has the right to conduct diplomatic missions and set foreign policy on behalf of the United States.- Executive Clemency. The President has the power to pardon or commute the sentence of convicted criminals. Emergency Power. The President has the ability to declare a 90 day period of Emergency during which he can use the full force of the military without seeking permission from Congress either in the form of a declaration of war or through funding, Veto.…

    • 5175 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Circuit Court Case Study

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On June 1, 2012, Wilson-Gaskins, pro se, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County against Kaye, Kaye’s professional liability insurer, and GEICO, alleging that they had engaged in “legal malpractice, retaliation and collusion.” Thereafter, Wilson-Gaskins retained counsel, venue was transferred to Montgomery County, and GEICO and Kaye’s professional liability insurer were dismissed from the action. In an amended complaint, Wilson-Gaskins asserted that Kaye’s breach of his professional duty of care constituted professional negligence and a breach of contract.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whereas Texas has a bifurcated appellate system, the Texas Supreme Courts handles appeals in civil matters (except for juvenile defendants) and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals hears cases of criminal matters (excluding juvenile proceedings) and the other courts have blurred lines of jurisdiction. The Texas district courts are general jurisdiction trial courts but share jurisdiction with County Courts and some Justice of the Peace cases. County courts have exclusive jurisdiction over misdemeanors (offenses involving jail time), and concurrent jurisdiction over civil cases, and appellate jurisdiction over JP and municipal court cases. Municipal courts relate to crimes of public safety and quality of life problems. And then the lowest level of court in Texas, the Justice of the Peace that handles class C misdemeanors punishable by fine only.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court is the highest court in the state and they review the decisions that were made in civil and criminal cases and they rule on all the death sentence…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are only two states in the U. S. with a bifurcated courts system, which means two separate high courts, one for civil matters and one for criminal appeals. In the state of Texas, there is the Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. In this paper, it will be explained why these two courts are in place, what role they play in the courts system, and what service they provide. The Texas Supreme Court is in place in order to have the last word over civil matters arising from the lower courts in the state of Texas.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They work with minor civil cases and criminal offences where the maximum sum of compensation is less than $10,000. Courts can issue same types of warrants as Municipal Courts and serve as the coroner, if there is no other medical examiner. Small Claims Courts give only monetary compensations – they can not make person to start or stop doing something. Cases from both types of institutions are appealed by State Intermediate Appellate Courts that have intermediate appellate jurisdiction. Defendants have rights to appeal their convictions, if they have records of the trial and the motion for a new trial was made before the 10th day after judgment.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merit Selection In Texas

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The new system created a new level of civil appeals courts throughout the state that would hear appeals from local courts. The cases would only go to the Supreme Court if it could not be resolved in the local…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The president is the chief executive of the federal government. The governor is the executive head of the state. However, it is the President who has the greater responsibility and authority. Currently, the President of the United States is Barack Obama and the governor for the state of Texas is Greg Abbott.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Texas judicial system has been called one of the most complex in the United States, if not the world. The state of Texas is one of the seven states that uses partisan elections to select judges. Judicial selection begins with partisan elections and significant amounts of money for campaigning in order to win the election or reelection. Partisan elections influence the electorate in a consistent party label for the voting process. Another problem that the Texas judicial system lacks is the minority of representation on the bench.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plural Executive The Plural Executive was adopted in 1876 to limit the executive power, and disperse it in between several elected officials. The power is evenly distributed between the governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, and comptroller of public accounts, commissioner of the General Land Office, the commissioner of agriculture, and the secretary of state. Texans elect six of these officials, while one is chosen by the governor, the secretary of state. The point in the plural executive is too keep one from having too much power, in that case I believe having the plural executive is a good cause for the state of Texas. Each elected official in the plural executive has the choice to work independently from each other.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jurek V. Texas Case Study

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Texas has had several cases rise to the Supreme Court level. There have been many that not only impact the Lone Star State, but also the nation’s justice department. Every court case offers a new side to any issue being addressed and aides in future decisions on cases dealing with the same subject. These cases allow improvements of the operation of the Justice Department. Jurek v. Texas is one of the cases that follows prior case decisions, but also allows for further improvements of the justice system.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All in all, the Governor holds unrivaled power in the State’s executive…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays