The South Vs. South : Anti Confederate Of The Civil War Essay

1241 Words 5 Pages
Divide and conquer, and unite the nation in upholding the union: these were the main motives and strategies utilized during the striking period of the American Civil War (1861-1865). “The South vs. the South: How Anti-Confederate Southerners Shaped the Course of the Civil War”, written by William Freehling, vindicates the logistics and ideas behind this drive from the antebellum apprehensions, all the way through the discourses of war. Combining excellent research and an original theory for the Confederate loss, Freehling’s inimitable style of expression was expertly relayed and thoughtfully insisted, leaving crucial information that will change what we have already known about America’s bloodiest war.
Although a short read, the book should not be overlooked for its insignificant length. Within approximately 200 pages, Freehling masterfully introduced, supported, and confirmed his argument that the Confederacy was crippled due to divided support throughout the border south states. The book, with regards to social and geographical conditions of both sides at that time, is very well organized consequentially, however, the author often strayed from the central idea to focus on accompanying events. Maintaining the argument that the title suggests, I will first examine the notions of war strategies and demographic conditions of both sides.
In early laws of war, we can confirm that military surrenders are causative of a simple explanation: The heavier battalions will win. In…

Related Documents