What They Fought For By James Mcpherson's History

Improved Essays
What They Fought For 1861-1865. By, James M McPherson. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1994. Introduction, Chapters One – Three. $11.99. Paperback.)
James McPherson’s What They Fought For shows readers an inside look of what Civil War soldiers experienced on the frontline. McPherson does this by using diary and handwritten letters soldiers would send home. “The principle sources for that book, and this one, are the personal letters and diaries written by soldiers during their war experience.” (1). McPherson states his reasoning for using such sources because they offer “unparalleled richness and candor- richness because Civil War armies were the most literate in all history to that time and the letters of their soldiers have been preserved in matchless abundance for historians to read; candor because unlike modern armies, those of the Civil War did not discourage diary keeping or subject soldiers’ letters to censorship.” (1). McPherson’s main point for his book is to show case what the soldiers believed they were fighting for and their experience
…show more content…
The Confederates who saw the Northern Yankees as nothing more than tyrants. A young Virginian officer’s letters stated this belief “confident that the Confederacy would win this “second War for American Independence” because Tyranny cannot prosper in the nineteenth century” against “a people fighting for their liberties.’’ (9). Like how the British had done to the colonists a century and a half ago. McPherson also shows how the Confederates lived through letters and journals they wrote in during the Civil War. These letters told about many things; how the Southern fighters felt about the war, the tyrannical Yanks, southern ideology, slaves, and a yearning for the war to be over. It was surprising that only a handful of Confederate soldiers had come from slaveholding

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Isenberg Summary

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this section the author Isenberg argues that white trash moving at center of politics and played a notable role at center of the crisis. As the south secede from the union, further distinctions need to be made. As the author state that 1861, aimed to restore the virtue pedigree of the founding fathers. She said the union soldiers represented something much different than vagabond stock and swamp people. The confederates aim to prove that they were genuine offspring and rightful lineage of the first American republic.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tony Horwitz’s Confederates in the Attic takes the reader through a tour of a New South still stuck in the Old and demonstrates its complex relationship with the American Civil War. Through his anecdotes and interviews, Horwitz gives the reader seemingly candid perceptions of the War. These help explain why it is that the South continues to be so stalwartly devoted to the War like no other part of the country: the War still rages in their minds. His mixed use of modern perceptions and historical analysis works well for analyzing the Civil War from both points of remembrance and reality.…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the course of his book, Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam, James McPherson examines not only the events that occurred on September 17, 1862, but he also outlines the causes and explanations for the American Civil War. Firstly, McPherson emphasizes the role that slavery played in causing the war and he shares details regarding the outcomes and results of this historic battle. McPherson’s second main objective of this book is to highlight how tentative General McClellan was over the course of the war. General McClellan was too cautious in engaging the Confederate Army even when he had the captured plans of General Lee.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “The Civil War continues to fester in the South more than in other places.” These are the first words historian David Goldfield writes in the preface to his book, Still Fighting the Civil War. Noted historian James McPherson was apparently astonished at the persistence and growth of Civil War reenactors and America’s passion for the Civil War. Sociologist and historian James W. Loewen takes issue with the romance and popularity of the Confederate States of America. He writes, “If its appeal were just a harmless atavism, then no one would mind that the ratio of Confederate to Union Civil War reenactors is two to one.…

    • 190 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For a relatively young country, America has been involved in many critical wars. However, the Civil War stands as one of the most substantial blemishes in American History. It was a time of division, where the agricultural South and industrial North fought to abolish slavery, which was the backbone of the South’s economy. Nothing exemplified the countries division like the contrast of both sides’ military generals. The South’s general, Robert E. Lee was traditional man, rooted in the mindset of privileged upper class dominance, and class segregation.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This illustrates McPhersons disapproval of McClellan's actions. It can be said that Mcpherson did an exemplary job with his method of writing. This is evident because he enabled the reader to appreciate the complexities of Lincoln’s dilemmas as Commander of Chief during the civil…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    James M. McPherson’s book, “Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution,” explores this simple, yet difficult question on whether or not the Civil War was indeed a second American Revolution. McPherson is able to defend his opinion through his own documented lectures and published papers that the Civil War was indeed a second revolution by exploring various definitions of the word “revolution” and investigating data related to African-Americans in an antebellum and postwar America. The author additionally outlines President Lincoln’s opinion of the war, while adding some remarkable facts about Lincoln himself, the importance of the familiar stories and comparisons Lincoln used to communicate to the public, and the differences in Lincoln’s…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Civil War was a time of turmoil for the entire nation, not only the Union or the Confederacy, but everyone. The question isn’t who, but rather why. Why was a once united country torn apart? What made individuals lay down their life’s? In Gary Gallagher’s book The Union War he makes intention to indicate why the Union fought so intensely and what the war stood for.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    President Abraham Lincoln flirtation with African- American Civil Rights, John Wilkes Booths undying love for the confederacy, and the ultimate fall of the Confederate army. Independently, each of these points hold little weight of importance, but together these three points created a fire storm lasting close to six years, costing more than 620,000 Americans lives, and two faiths’ that will ultimately be entwined with each in the history book. A collision of two people that will be forever attach with each other in the history book a faith where you can’t talk about one without talking about the other. In this essay, we will discuss each of these points; Booth passion toward the Confederacy, the fall of the Confederate army, and Lincoln wanting…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From reading For Cause and Comrades, I learned about several motivations and reasons that soldiers from the North and the South fought in the Civil War. Overall, the soldiers and their respective sides fought for very similar reasons and motives. Both sides were fighting for their views on slavery, how the states should govern laws, and how the economy should operate. I plan to analyze and compare the motives for the North and the South and show how each side was fighting for remarkably similar reasons. Through the reasons and motives listed above, we will be able to see the similarities but, also we will be able to see how each side was different as well.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The essay, “Long-Legged Yankee Lies” was a surprising essay – not what I expected to read after reading James M. McPherson’s other works. The focus of this essay was to thoroughly explain one of the main interpretations of the Civil War – the “South’s Lost Cause.” The Lost Cause, as the Southerners perceived themselves after the Civil War, is explained in that the South was incredibly outnumbered by the North in both men and resources. The South perceived themselves as righteous men who fought for state’s rights, freedoms granted by the Constitution that cannot legally be infringed upon by the government, and the approval of the people with actions taken against them by their government.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shifting Grounds

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his introduction, the author states that in writing his book, “In doing so it is inspired by scholarship on unionism in the Civil War South, which, unlike most scholarship on nationalism, has been sensitive to the existence of fine shades of loyalty that are contextual, relational, and changing.” (Quigley, 6) Without consulting secondary sources, Quigley’s inspiration would be lackluster, creating doubt in his argument. Additionally, the use of primary sources illustrates individuals feelings during the years of 1848 through 1865. Diaries and letters provide sentiments that southerners may have been hesitant to say aloud, such as their inability to dedicate themselves fully to the Confederate cause.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This war tore Americans apart to and brought them back together. McPherson’s book What They Fought For 1861-1865, sheds light on feelings, actions, and events that have not always been brought to light with regard to the Civil War. The uncandid use of the letters and diary help to reveal and give a better understanding of the war through the actual people that lived…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Civil War was very misunderstood in that no one really knows the exact reason of why the war started. In Apostles of Disunion, Dew discusses topics such as slavery, racism, economics and state rights to push his point of view on the audience of why the war and secession began. Charles B. Dew wrote this book to inform the audience the secession came from not just the factor of state rights during the time between 1860 and 1861. Because Dew was a Southerner himself, he writes the book off of self-knowledge, experience others, and facts including people and their perspectives on the cause. The most common claim when it came to The Civil War’s cause is it beginning due to slavery and racism in the south; however Dew argues that the…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These values are inscribed into the beliefs of the Confederacy and sharply contrast the changing values of Grant and the Union. Grant represents the future of America as he is fighting to end the beliefs of the privileges of that Lee symbolizes. In the “Western country, there was a deep, implicit dissatisfaction with a past that had settled into grooves. ”(8) and General Grant fought to remove the dissatisfactory foundation that America originated from, alluding to the fact that Grant represents the new foundation of America in which he was fighting to create. General Grant and General Lee have contrasting ideas to fight for as, Grant is fighting for the future and Lee is fighting to preserve the past.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays