In addition, the counsel for the Prosecution requested own witness to testify in order to give more evidence to the jury. On the one hand, the prosecutor used a strategic language to obtain certain answer to convince the jury, the witness was not under any pressure to respond to the persecutors' questions. This is a direct examination, which known as examination -in-chief. On the other hand , the prosecutor called the other side of the case for a purpose of examining the witness in a challenging way; unfriendly, in order to extract certain fact to convince the jury.This is known as cross-examination , to disapprove the certification which demonstrate by the opposition.
