I think that the Judges verdict was correctly placed. The Defendants website disclaimer, clearly states they are not liable for any false information provided by any members as well as verifying whether a person is married or not. The 30-day money back guaranteed is also offered, and it seems a bit unreal that it took the Plaintiff three months to see that something was wrong. It does seem a bit unusual that the Defendant’s cousins are members of the website and happen to be the “same person”. Whether there were other women who thought they all have dated the same men, there simply isn’t any proof to support this claim.
I think that the Judges verdict was correctly placed. The Defendants website disclaimer, clearly states they are not liable for any false information provided by any members as well as verifying whether a person is married or not. The 30-day money back guaranteed is also offered, and it seems a bit unreal that it took the Plaintiff three months to see that something was wrong. It does seem a bit unusual that the Defendant’s cousins are members of the website and happen to be the “same person”. Whether there were other women who thought they all have dated the same men, there simply isn’t any proof to support this claim.