Preliminary Guilts In Court Cases

Improved Essays
Preliminary hearings are conducted after an individual has been arraigned in the court. It is a process where the judge determines whether there is enough evidence for the case to be presented. Using a legal standard known as probable cause, the judge determines whether the government has provided substantial evidence that can reasonably convince a jury of the fact that the defendant has committed the crimes in question (Montemayor, 2014). A suspect is entitled to a preliminary hearing to ensure that he or she is protected from irrational arrest and detention. Therefore, substantial evidence must be provided to hold the defendant for trial. If in any case there is insufficient evidence, the judge is supposed to dismiss the charges. Preliminary hearings may be in the form of initial appearance where the defendant is informed of the charges against them. The defendant is also advised on the right to be silent since any statement that he may make might be utilized against him in the court. It may also be essential for the defendant to seek for a bail (Montemayor, 2014). …show more content…
Witnesses are also called to testify and are allowed to bring with them any physical evidence that they have with an aim to convince the judge that the defendant must stand the trial. A cross-examination of the government’s witnesses is conducted and enquires if there might be any other reasonable evidence that could be used against the defendant (Xiaowei, 2015). These are aimed at convincing the judge that the evidence that is provided might not be strong enough to withstand in a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Summary Of In Re Gault

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    These rights include the notice of the charges, the right to have counsel, the right to confront and question witnesses, and the protection from self-incrimination. At the close of the…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Casey Anthony Case Study

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The evidence found at a crime scene can be used to provide visual evidence. Evidence used should be used with wisdom. Visual evidence helps the jury gain a better understanding of what took place during that time. People can’t go to trial without some type of presentation such as animations, graphics, and videos. Presentations may be costly but it can make the difference between being freedom or prison.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bsbwor501 Part 1

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages

    After the initial hearing is complete he/she will go to a preliminary hearing the fifth step, where a judge will determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed the crime with which he/she is charged. The sixth step will be done either by a grand jury who will investigate the charges from the preliminary…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the trial where I am the judge of the case, there is the Gagnon 1 hearing in the state of Pennsylvania, if someone has been arrested for a violation of probation, the authorities are required to follow "due process" if the authorities are seeking to revoke that person's probation. According to Pennsylvania's highest "law of the land," the probationer will be guaranteed the two specific hearings before there will be any type of revocation of parole that can take place. With the first of the two hearings, which is referred to as the "Gagnon I Hearing," which is a preliminary hearing, the "Gagnon II Hearing," this hearing will have the final ruling after the preliminary hearing has concluded. In the state of Pennsylvania, in the preliminary hearing, "Gagnon I" needs to be held in-between the seven-to-ten days of when your arrest on the alleged violation of probation.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This ensures that only statements freely made by a defendant can be used in court. They observed that “the modern practice of in-custody interrogation is psychologically rather than physically oriented,” giving custodial interrogations by the police as an example. The police must ensure that defendants are aware of their rights before they are questioned, backed up by the Fifth Amendment. They also decided that any statements made by defendants during a custodial interrogation in which the defendant has not been read his “Miranda rights” do not count in any court.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda Warning is designed to inform anyone in police custody the right to due process by adhering to the Fifth Amendment. Certain protocols and formality must be followed by implementing four things before conducting an interrogation. The defendant must first be informed that they have the right to remain silent (Hall, 2015). Secondly, they must be informed that anything they say can and will be used against them in a court of law (Hall, 2015). They should also be informed that they have a right to receive legal advice (Hall, 2015).…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This chapter goes into the specifics of pretrial procedures. It discusses the support or refusal of a motion to offer in a plea and sanctions. The first article goes into detail about the responsibilities of a sheriff when detaining a prisoner from another county or when jailing a minor. In article 2 it specifies the proceedings of a commitment hearing, such as, bonds, warrants, the witness’s responsibility to appear in court, the time that is given to be prepared for the case, and hearing the evidence provided in a case. Article 3 sets the instructions for indictments and what that means for officers, children and other specific indictments.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nordic (Scandinavian) Model of Corrections is very unlike the American Model. These prisons are considered to be somewhat open and inside them the detainees are nearly allowed to live like regular citizens. In countries such as Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Norway, it is not uncommon for ping pong tables, pool tables, aquariums to be present in their high-security prisons. Although this differs from how the United States has classically viewed corrections, Nordic prisons actually have must lower rates of recidivism. In Nordic prisons, each prisoner is designated a contact officer, similar to a corrections officer, who assists them as they progress to return to the outside world.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The defendant that was charged with or indicated crime during the preliminary hearing, when dealing with the rights to attach the defendant must be charged with the crime first. Attachment to the right to counsel the individual is merely suspected of committing a crime. Counsel rights don’t attach to the investigation stage, even if the individual isn’t the only suspect. Many of the suspects have the right to attach counsel under the Sixth Amendment when a prosecution is commenced against him or her. In the cases Alabama v. Coleman the Supreme Court is does, and the state must provide counsel if the is indigent.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Court Cases

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Opening statements are when the prosecution and the defense each outline their case (Lippmann, 2014, p.533). I next witnessed the prosecution present a Case-in-Chief. The Case-in-Chief is where the prosecutor has the burden of proving every element of the crime and in an effort to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, may present the direct testimony of witnesses and may introduce documents, scientific tests, and tangible evidence (Lippmann, 2014, p.533). At this point the arresting Fresno PD Officer Brian Twedt was called to the stand for questioning. I then witnessed a Cross-Examination which involves asking the witness questions about his or direct examination (Lippmann, 2014, p.533).…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most of the testimonies in this case are regarding the material evidence,…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I chose to compare and contrast the United States’ criminal justice system with England’s system. One significant aspect of the United States’ criminal justice system is due process. Due process is defined by www.reference.com as “the principle that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safe guards (www.reference.com)”. There are many similarities and differences between these two countries, and this paper is aimed to show how both of their criminal justice systems operate. There are many factors that make the United States one of the best nations in the world.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing Reid Interview Technique and the PEACE Model Dominic Wood Police Foundations Interview and investigations Amy Bjerkens October 03 2017 Comparing Reid Interviewing technique and the PEACE model While the Reid model aims at obtaining a confession from the witness or suspect, the PEACE Model aims at getting the information that will help in determining the guiltiness or the innocence of the subject. Whereas the Reid model is interrogator-based and follows what is dictated by nature and the reactions of the subject, the PEACE Model is a step by step process which is preplanned in the mind of the interrogator. The Reid interviewing model is based on body language while the PEACE Model is founded on deceiving the subject…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police question suspects and witnesses for two reasons, to gather information about the crime and to try to get a suspect to confess if they believe the individual is guilty. This is where Miranda rights are important. The Constitution guarantees certain rights including the following. The right to remain silent and the right to have an attorney, either one that is appointed by the state or one that is privately hired. To start with the first line of the Miranda statement “You have the right to remain silent”.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment 5.3: Role of Investigator Introduction Investigators have an immense role in the criminal justice system. They have to ensure they follow due process, as well as, keeping the integrity of the evidence to prove continuity when entered into court. In the QB trial video, R v. Perry and Manitoba (2016), the investigating officer, Constable York, seized four exhibits: a wallet, a Timex watch, a kitchen knife, and a gun replica, which entered into court as physical evidence. Constable York also testified as a key witness, who then had to undergo a cross-examination by the defence counsel.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays