Preliminary Guilts In Court Cases

Improved Essays
Preliminary hearings are conducted after an individual has been arraigned in the court. It is a process where the judge determines whether there is enough evidence for the case to be presented. Using a legal standard known as probable cause, the judge determines whether the government has provided substantial evidence that can reasonably convince a jury of the fact that the defendant has committed the crimes in question (Montemayor, 2014). A suspect is entitled to a preliminary hearing to ensure that he or she is protected from irrational arrest and detention. Therefore, substantial evidence must be provided to hold the defendant for trial. If in any case there is insufficient evidence, the judge is supposed to dismiss the charges. Preliminary hearings may be in the form of initial appearance where the defendant is informed of the charges against them. The defendant is also advised on the right to be silent since any statement that he may make might be utilized against him in the court. It may also be essential for the defendant to seek for a bail (Montemayor, 2014). …show more content…
Witnesses are also called to testify and are allowed to bring with them any physical evidence that they have with an aim to convince the judge that the defendant must stand the trial. A cross-examination of the government’s witnesses is conducted and enquires if there might be any other reasonable evidence that could be used against the defendant (Xiaowei, 2015). These are aimed at convincing the judge that the evidence that is provided might not be strong enough to withstand in a

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    I chose to compare and contrast the United States’ criminal justice system with England’s system. One significant aspect of the United States’ criminal justice system is due process. Due process is defined by www.reference.com as “the principle that an individual cannot be deprived of life, liberty, or property without appropriate legal procedures and safe guards (www.reference.com)”. There are many similarities and differences between these two countries, and this paper is aimed to show how both of their criminal justice systems operate. There are many factors that make the United States one of the best nations in the world.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pretrial process is very important to any case. It is important to both sides. It sets the climate for the prosecution’s strategy and it helps the defendant’s lawyer know how he needs to best set up the defense for his client. Bail is set for the defendant, and an examination of the facts is also reviewed. If a grand jury is chosen there are rules that have to be followed in order for a fair trial to be given.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Court Cases

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On November 22, 2016, I sat in courtroom 507 of the Fresno County Superior Court, under the Honorable Judge Timothy Kams. Judge Kams was conducting a jury selection for a jury trial dealing with a felony DUI case. During the jury selection, I witnessed a Venire. A venire or jury pool, is a master list or jury list, from which a petit panel is selected, typically is based on names drawn from voter registration lists or lists of licensed drivers over eighteen years of age (Lippmann, 2014, p.518). I also witnessed a Voir Dire.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the trial where I am the judge of the case, there is the Gagnon 1 hearing in the state of Pennsylvania, if someone has been arrested for a violation of probation, the authorities are required to follow "due process" if the authorities are seeking to revoke that person's probation. According to Pennsylvania's highest "law of the land," the probationer will be guaranteed the two specific hearings before there will be any type of revocation of parole that can take place. With the first of the two hearings, which is referred to as the "Gagnon I Hearing," which is a preliminary hearing, the "Gagnon II Hearing," this hearing will have the final ruling after the preliminary hearing has concluded. In the state of Pennsylvania, in the preliminary hearing, "Gagnon I" needs to be held in-between the seven-to-ten days of when your arrest on the alleged violation of probation.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Examines the offender’s background to provide the sentencing judge with facts needed to make an informed sentencing decision. It also involves a dispute-settlement process during which the probation officer works with the defendant and the victim to resolve the complaint before sentencing (Schmalleger, 2015). In the Coatesville Fire Case, the offenders the prosecuting attorney would look at the evidence, testimony of eyewitnesses, and the confessions of the suspects to provide the sentencing judge with the facts to decide on the case. Determines whether the case should be referred for formal court proceedings or held open for adjustment services (Schmalleger, 2015).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States a person is arrested when a police officer believes an offense has taken place or is about to take place. In order for the police officer to make an arrest he or she must meet certain criteria they have to adhere to. Probable cause or reasonable suspicion is the legal standard which authorizes a police officer the right to make an arrest, conduct a personal or property search or obtain a warrant. When a person is arrested he or she must be read their Miranda rights. The Miranda rights emphasize that the person being arrested has the right to remain silent and that what they say can be used against them in court.…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Withdrawn/Voluntary Nonsuit When the plaintiff abandons his case, and consents that judgment go against him for costs. 2. Compromise/ Settlement - no court hearing A settlement that does not necessarily involve both parties appearing before the judge. Includes dismissals initiated by one of the parties for failure to prosecute; reconciliation orders, workers’ compensation settlements; compromise and settlement orders.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human rights are an important aspect of human dignity. One of these human rights is the “innocent till proven guilty” right. But why exactly is this an important right? This is what I intend to find out.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the criminal cases due process includes the need for probable cause before you can arrest someone and that the criminal defendant is presumed innocent until a judge or jury finds them guilty of the crime. Due process focuses more on the step by step examination of the criminal defendant. The process begins by analyzing the defendants’ rights through the police investigation and if they find probable cause they are arrested. This means that the person believes a crime has been committed and the person of interest is involved. They look into the statement the suspect reported to the police and check out any evidence they have.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Importance of Due Process in the Criminal Justice System Andy X. Hernandez Troy University Abstract Criminal justice is not just about going after criminals and putting them behind bars. There is more to it than just locking one up. There are certain checks and balances and rights that defendants have before, during, and after their trial. We have learned that each defendant is afforded protection by the Bill of Rights such as right to a speedy trial (Sixth Amendment) and the Fifth Amendment: the right that no one shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.”…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Comparing Reid Interview Technique and the PEACE Model Dominic Wood Police Foundations Interview and investigations Amy Bjerkens October 03 2017 Comparing Reid Interviewing technique and the PEACE model While the Reid model aims at obtaining a confession from the witness or suspect, the PEACE Model aims at getting the information that will help in determining the guiltiness or the innocence of the subject. Whereas the Reid model is interrogator-based and follows what is dictated by nature and the reactions of the subject, the PEACE Model is a step by step process which is preplanned in the mind of the interrogator. The Reid interviewing model is based on body language while the PEACE Model is founded on deceiving the subject…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nordic (Scandinavian) Model of Corrections is very unlike the American Model. These prisons are considered to be somewhat open and inside them the detainees are nearly allowed to live like regular citizens. In countries such as Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Norway, it is not uncommon for ping pong tables, pool tables, aquariums to be present in their high-security prisons. Although this differs from how the United States has classically viewed corrections, Nordic prisons actually have must lower rates of recidivism. In Nordic prisons, each prisoner is designated a contact officer, similar to a corrections officer, who assists them as they progress to return to the outside world.…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This chapter goes into the specifics of pretrial procedures. It discusses the support or refusal of a motion to offer in a plea and sanctions. The first article goes into detail about the responsibilities of a sheriff when detaining a prisoner from another county or when jailing a minor. In article 2 it specifies the proceedings of a commitment hearing, such as, bonds, warrants, the witness’s responsibility to appear in court, the time that is given to be prepared for the case, and hearing the evidence provided in a case. Article 3 sets the instructions for indictments and what that means for officers, children and other specific indictments.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment 5.3: Role of Investigator Introduction Investigators have an immense role in the criminal justice system. They have to ensure they follow due process, as well as, keeping the integrity of the evidence to prove continuity when entered into court. In the QB trial video, R v. Perry and Manitoba (2016), the investigating officer, Constable York, seized four exhibits: a wallet, a Timex watch, a kitchen knife, and a gun replica, which entered into court as physical evidence. Constable York also testified as a key witness, who then had to undergo a cross-examination by the defence counsel.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects A lineup is comprised of a suspect who is either guilty or innocent amongst various others who may or may not be in connection to the crime in which are deemed innocent. This article hypothesized how unfair lineups make witnesses more likely to confuse innocent and guilty suspects. This study was orchestrated by Melissa F. Colloff and Kimberley A. Wade in the Department of Psychology and University of Warwick and Deryn Strange in the John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays