Preliminary Guilts In Court Cases

Good Essays
Preliminary hearings are conducted after an individual has been arraigned in the court. It is a process where the judge determines whether there is enough evidence for the case to be presented. Using a legal standard known as probable cause, the judge determines whether the government has provided substantial evidence that can reasonably convince a jury of the fact that the defendant has committed the crimes in question (Montemayor, 2014). A suspect is entitled to a preliminary hearing to ensure that he or she is protected from irrational arrest and detention. Therefore, substantial evidence must be provided to hold the defendant for trial. If in any case there is insufficient evidence, the judge is supposed to dismiss the charges. Preliminary hearings may be in the form of initial appearance where the defendant is informed of the charges against them. The defendant is also advised on the right to be silent since any statement that he may make might be utilized against him in the court. It may also be essential for the defendant to seek for a bail (Montemayor, 2014). …show more content…
Witnesses are also called to testify and are allowed to bring with them any physical evidence that they have with an aim to convince the judge that the defendant must stand the trial. A cross-examination of the government’s witnesses is conducted and enquires if there might be any other reasonable evidence that could be used against the defendant (Xiaowei, 2015). These are aimed at convincing the judge that the evidence that is provided might not be strong enough to withstand in a

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This hearing determines if there is sufficient evidence that exists against an offender to continue the criminal justice process. The judge in this step searches for a probable cause to prove a crime was committed and the suspect accomplished doing so. Nevertheless, if a probable cause is determined, the accused suspect is held for trial on the information, which results in formal charging. In federal cases and other states, there is a grand jury that is empanelled to determine if there is enough evidence to file indictment charges against the suspect with the crimes. However if the grand jury finds there is sufficient evidence to warrant a trial it issues a true bill, if not it issues a no bill and he or she is filtered out of the criminal justice network (Appalachian State University, n.d).…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Main Juror Jury Functions

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A juror, in this day and age, is needed in order for defendants to receive a fair and competent trial. Not every Juror, however, qualifies to attend a trial and determine the faith of the defendant. In order for a person to qualify as a juror, they are required to sustain certain functions in the court of law. That being said, the main function that a Juror must follow is the idea of determining who is a reliable witness and which statement is the most credible (Gardner and Anderson, 2010). Once the testimony has been evaluated…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The next step is the bail or bond stage. The judge will determine if the offender is a flight risk, drug use, violent behavior, and weigh his or her ties with the community. If the accused is deemed a flight risk or too violent to be released on bail then bail may be denied. At the preliminary hearing a grand jury will hear all of the evidence that is brought against the offender. They will then determine if there is enough evidence to go to trial.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The second is law making. “At least in common law countries, appellate judges decide cases that provide precedents to guide decisions in future cases” (Drahozal, 2011). This is one reason why appeals are needed to ensure the defendant is not a victim of the courts errors. If the defendant can prove the trial court did in fact make a legal error or errors, or they were denied due process of the law, or the right to a fair trail was not met, it could result in a retrial…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Then, the court sends a formal notice with charges to the suspect. Arraignment: The suspect is arrested and charged before a judge. The court informs the suspect of his/her constitutional rights such as a right to have an attorney. Further, the court informs the suspect whether he/she will be released or held in prison. Discovery.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The second, is the burden of proof required to assign guilt. In civil case the plaintiff needs to show a civil wrong was committed, and that the preponderance of evidence shows the defendant is guilty of the issue in dispute. Basically this means, the plaintiff needs to prove it is more likely than not the defendant is guilty. Criminal cases require the jury to find the defendant guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. Beyond these differences the process’ are very similar.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He suggests, “motions for retrial based on false testimony presented by prosecution witnesses should be governed by a standard drawn from newly discovered evidence and prosecutorial misconduct” (p. 52). He also explains how a proper test for courtroom misconduct is more likely achievable if there is a great chance that the jury is aware of the false testimony and would avoid convicting the defendant. By acknowledging the challenges that the system faces in dealing with courtroom misconduct, the author indicates that there is a need to hold professional members of the court with a greater amount of accountability. Although there is the potential consequence for retrial, some attorneys…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The prosecutor is a lawyer who represents the government and they are responsible for making the decision whether to charge someone with a crime. The first thing the prosecutor looks for is a sound case, because in some situations you have cases that have legal problems that could get the case thrown out of court. Example if the police officer violated the defendants’ rights while looking for evidence then that evidence would be inadmissible. Also the prosecutor needs to figure out if there is enough supporting evidence to have a higher probability of a conviction. “The duty of a public prosecutor is to present the case against an accused person by bringing all the evidence that is necessary and available, and presenting it in the best…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If a grand jury is chosen there are rules that have to be followed in order for a fair trial to be given. The same can be said for the conduct of the prosecutor and his team. Some say the phrase, “Innocent until proven guilty” helps the defendant in a courtroom, and that the prosecutor has the burden of proving guilt. The pretrial detention is defined as the detaining of an accused person in a criminal case before the trial as even taken place in court. Normally the reason this type of action takes place is because either failure to post bail, or due to the denial of release under a pretrial detention statue.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The defendant 's awareness and sanity must be intact to have him stand on trial. However, assessment conducted by assigning professionals has formed part of the court system to determine the competency of the defendant. Either the defense or the prosecution or the court itself may raise the issue, even if the defendant himself objects to it. The defendant 's mental state is crucial during trial. Two of the most frequently requested forensic evaluations involve questions of competency to stand trial (CST) and mental state at the time of the…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays