The Pros And Cons Of International Whaling

Decent Essays
The International Whaling Commission (IWC) is considering lifting the ban on whaling. Many people are horrified at the thought that anyone could even contemplate it.

Whales suffer from all types of threats like ship strikes, over fishing of krill, habitat loss and chemical and sound pollution. Many problems have arose from climate change like less krill, food-rich areas moving south. However, the most disturbing threat is whaling. Before whaling began in the 11th century, there were than 250,000 blue whales. Before the worldwide protection in 1967, the species were nearly extinct. From 1904-67, 350,000 were killed in the southern hemisphere alone. During the whaling season in 1931, 29,000 blue whales were killed. Scientists say that the blue

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Seal Hunt Must be Discontinued The Federal Government of Canada should not allow the seal hunt to continue. To begin with, seals are killed in exceedingly cruel ways. Seal pups that are just over a month old are stabbed and killed with hooks and dragged across the ice to leave a trail of blood. According to a study in 2001, a team of veterinarians determined that in over 40 % of the cases they studied, the seals were most likely skinned alive.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Fishing. People enjoy it a lot as a hobby or career whether it’s for a bonding experience between family or friends or a way to survive. But could it be too much? We have of plenty of fish, right? Wrong.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Killer Whales should not be kept in captivity at seaworld. Orcas are called Killer Whales, but they’re actually Dolphins. The name “Killer Whales” actually comes from the fact that they kill whales. Have you ever wondered what animals are capable of when they are frustrated with humans? There are many reasons why Killer Whales should not be kept in captivity, many people see Seaworld as a place to go explore and see Marine animals do extraordinary things but what the people don’t know is how bad they are treated.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whaling has been a Native American tradition for over 2,000 years, incidentally the International Whaling Commission and many other nongovernmental organizations are trying to change that tradition. These types of organizations such as Greenpeace, IWC, and NAMMCO, entail transnationalist views. Whereas on the other hand, states like Japan, Norway, and Iceland, have nationalist perceptions. The transnationalist argument against whaling mainly deals with animal rights and also the impact on the environment of losing a species. The nationalist’s argument on the other hand, involves experimentation intentions and tradition in cultures, and supporting some economies.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Killer whales are getting endangered fast due to global warming. Hudson bay in canada is a frozen bay and 2 adult orcas and 9 youths got stuck in a whole in the ice due to climate change. Antarctic ice will cause a decrease in the killer whale habitats, there will be less food for the killer whale. People still don't known if the killer whales will be able to adapt to other types of living. If we stop cities from making pollution the temperature will lower and the ice will not melt so the killer whales will be safer.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Western Australian government policy of culling sharks to ensure greater public safety, has caused nationwide debate, which is reflected in media texts through different views on the controversial measure. Dr Euan Ritchie, in his opinion piece, “predators such as sharks essential for world’s health” (Herald Sun 28/1/14), points out to his Victorian readers who may not be informed on the issue or support the cull that the killing of sharks is a dangerous and irrational practice that should be abandoned. Likewise, Horacek’s cartoon which may be aimed at those sympathetic for sharks, illustrates a similar view point to Ritchie, in that the cull is unjustified and politically motivated. On the contrary, the editorial (Australian 29/1/14) in addressing the issue to readers or activists opposed to the cull, argues in support of the government’s actions.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the Southern Ocean, activists have risk their life with putting themselves between the whales and the harpoons. In 2013 one government took Japan to court over its continued whaling. The problem is not only the hunting from whales, they also get caught in nets by bycatch.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We as a race have performed many studies on them to learn their life styles. Over time we started to capture them into tanks for entertainment and train them to do tricks and obey. Over all there have been many arguments about the orca whale species, “in the early 2005 orca whales and many other orca tribes had become an endangered species. The population of the Southern Residents Orcas in the Pacific Northwest has declined about 25 percent, and still we have not done enough to help them from disappearing” based on the Orca Lab studies. With only a 50 percent chance of their survival when they are first born, it makes it difficult to estimate the orca whale future.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The power of emotion: compassion In Marina Keegan’s essay, Why We Care About Whales, Marina claims on how humans value the life of humans and the life of non-human animals. The essay starts with a social occurrence of emerging beached whales. A natural force that is created by the movement of both the moon and the Earth push whales to the beach. While giving a detailed, vivid explanation of how beached whales die, Marina maximizes the sadness and lamentation of whales’ deaths. Furthermore, she describes her anecdote, which was happened at the beach in front of her house.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Whaling

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These nations will be suffering with higher rates of poverty and unemployment if they are unable to hunt/sell whales, due to it being their primary source of income (Levin, n.d.). However, these negative impacts could still be prevented. If these nations were to provide proper education for these small fishing villages, or to help them find another way to earn their incomes, they could still be able to survive, with minimal costs involved. 6) How should these claims be balanced against world opinion – which is generally very supportive of whales?…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The main problem which causes the most damage to the Blue whale’s population comes from whaling. Blue whales and other species of whales all weigh tons, meaning they can provide enormous amounts of meat, blubber, skin and other body parts with a single catch. It is believed that an average sized whale contains “152 tons of more or less edible material” and with some calculations, a single whale can provide “604,000 people [with a] single meal” (Nessen 1), and this excluding the other benefits such as blubber and skin which can be used in other applications. As a result, during the 1900s large amounts of whalers who were motivated by the whales great value to catch and slaughter more and more Blue whales (National 3). Due to such aggressive…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Arguments Against Whaling

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Is it fair for countries to try and prevent other countries from whaling? Do they have any right to stop countries like Japan, Iceland and Greenland who believe that whaling is part of their culture? This paper will bring together these different perspectives and provide an in-depth discussion on how we as a society can come together and promote the achievement of the common good in regards to whaling.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I’ve always hear about the controversy of whaling still going on the news, but usually about Japan doing it for scientific research. I’m surprised to learn that Norway does it also, but openly defying the ban by having it done commercially. Is something wrong if most of the world agree is wrong, or is it justified because it is a tradition? Can science justified if something is wrong or good? Does the world has right to tell a country that what they’re doing is wrong and can they force it to stop?…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We only have whales in the oceans today because of this movement. Jane J. Lee, scientific journalist, says “A loophole in the 1986 IWC ban on commercial whaling allowed for lethal take of large and medium-size…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whaling has been a controversial activity for some years now. Whales in today’s society have been regarded as “gentle giants” and highly intelligent animals, which is true. Some nations however, such as the Norwegian and Japanese have whaling deeply rooted in their culture and history. For many centuries, their ancestors took part in whaling as a means to sustain their life, livelihood and culture. I agree with the Norwegian and Japanese position on permitting the hunting of non-endangered species of whales as a cultural exemption, given that the hunting of the whales is regulated to prevent over-hunting so that the whale population can replenish.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays