Genetic Engineering: The Pros And Cons Of The 21st Century

Better Essays
Albert Einstein once said, “I fear the day that technology will surpass our human interaction. The world will have a generation of idiots.” Mr. Einstein, sadly that day has arrived. The 21st century already consists of an explosion of digital creation and discovery. People are living longer, diseases are being cured, and global communication is at an all-time high. However, the 21st century has begun to show all the probable danger to come from these discoveries. The theme of the 21st century will be recorded as the age of technological turmoil.
First of all, social media has taken over the world. From only 2002 to 2014 Friendster, Myspace, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram have been introduced. Each of these sites was created to allow people
…show more content…
Genetic engineering is the deliberated modification of the characteristics of an organism by manipulation its genetic material. There are many potential benefits of genetic engineering. Some include tackling and defeating disease, eliminating illness in young and unborn children, potentially longer life expectancy, and the ability to produce new foods. While these are benefits and could change the world for the better; the cons of genetic engineering outweigh the pros. To begin, genetic engineering causes moral controversy. Many religions believe that these scientists are playing God and that is not right. Also, if diseases are eliminated the world would become overpopulated. Diseases have been around throughout history for the specific purpose of maintaining the population growth. The longer life expectancies today already cause problems in society. Furthermore, genetic engineering can lead to some genetic deficits. Scientists may be able to eradicate one disease, but construct another. Dr. Mae-Wan Ho said, “Genetic engineering is inherently dangerous, because it greatly expands the scope for horizontal gene transfer and recombination, precisely the processes that create new viruses and bacteria that cause disease epidemics, and trigger cancer in cells.” Scientists have no way of knowing how their actions will affect the human race. Moreover, genetic diversity will be limited with genetic engineering. Genetic diversity is essential for a population’s chance to survive and flourish. Charles Darwin termed natural selection. Natural selection says that the fittest individuals in nature will succeed and reproduce. This idea would be greatly affected by a lack of genetic diversity. For example, garden.org states, “Suppose there’s an outbreak of a disease that threatens to wipe out an entire species. The more genetic variability there is within that species, the higher the likelihood that at least some

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    One of the good purposes could be that scientists could use GMOs to find cures for diseases in the world and r to get rid of them. Besides this I personally cannot think of another reason why GMOs should be even talked about in society. they are not doing what they are “labeled” to do, causing even more deaths, are leading to more diseases, and are the people behind it are wasting a lot of money that could be used to or other good…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Control Genetic Engineering Genetic engineering is the deliberate modification of the characteristics of an organism by manipulating its genetic material. Genetic engineering can: cure inherited diseases, modify plants so that they may fight pollution and make bigger/faster growing fruits and vegetables, make cats to glow in the dark, and cows that pass less gas. There are both pros and cons to genetic engineering. With that being said, society wants to know should it be controlled by law. In an article called, “Genetic Engineering Debate: Are There Lines We Shouldn 't Cross?”, it points out the two different views on this new technology.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The risks are immense as it gambles with human life, animals, and crops that sustain humanity. It is not only dangerous to contemporary humanity but also the future generations. We will never arrive at a situation where we can be sure that risks of cloning and genetic engineering are zero. Scientists will purport to make the risks appear "acceptable". Based on the above arguments, genetic engineering and cloning does not improve the circumstances of humans but instead destroys humanity and the ecosystems.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The diversity of this gene mixture is supposed to give this hybrid crop special characteristics like resistance to disease, the ability to deal with extreme environmental situations, and much higher crop yields at harvest time. <br><br>The production of genetically enhanced food is considered a radical approach to dealing with the world hunger crisis. Critics of gene refined food believe that tampering with the natural order of environmental evolution can be potentially dangerous. <br><br>"There is an uncertainty about the effects that chemical experimenting could have on non-target species (http://www.globalissues.org/EnvIssues/GEFood/IsGEFoodSafe.asp)." <br><br>Meaning that scientists fear that extracting genes that perform an apparently useful function as part of a plant or animal may not have the same effects if inserted into a totally unrelated species.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The risks of producing a "genobility," genetic overlords ruling a vast genetic underclass, are real. But genetics could also become a tool for reducing the class divide.” “Genomic science is racing toward a future in which foreseeable 16 improvements include reduced susceptibility to a host of diseases, increased life span, better cognitive functioning, and maybe even cosmetic enhancements such as whiter, straighter teeth. Yes, genetic orthodontics may be in our future. The challenge is to see that we don't also unleash the demons of discrimination and oppression. Although I acknowledge the risks, I believe that we can and will incorporate gene technology into the ongoing human adventure.” His tone is more optimistic compare to…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Proponents of the idea say that cloning could lead to more disease resistant plants, but, this very creation could cause lack of DNA diversity. So, cloning should not be allowed because because people are still very conflicted on the subject, also the cost of cloning is too extreme and, it would lack in DNA diversity. First of all, cloning is still very new to the world. Although cloning has been around since Dolly the Sheep, the whole world is still conflicted on the subject. Some feel that the cloning of embryos, is morally repugnant and may feel that the idea of cloning humans is “playing God” according to “What are the Pros and Cons of Cloning?” So, if too many people are conflicted based on a moral stance, it will create too much turmoil in the science community.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They believe that all humans are born as they were meant to be in the way of god. People also argue that genetic engineering is unethical and that modifying genes will lead to an imbalance in nature. There is a fear present that preventing diseases can lead to an overpopulation. Overpopulation is already a current problem in today’s society. As scientist progress overtime with medical advancements such as altering DNA, death rates can lower.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Benefits Of Cloning

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some people do not think it should take place because they believe that cloning is very dangerous for the humans and animals involved; they believe that the technology used in the cloning process is harmful to those involved, as well (Quinonez 1). For example, cloning may put them at a higher risk of developing genetic defects; it may cause premature aging, which would, in turn, lead to premature death (Quinonez 1). On the other hand, those that are oppose to cloning need to take into consideration that the technology used is relatively new and is still developing. It is obvious to note that the technology would have made mistakes and would not have worked one-hundred percent correctly the first time used. As researchers get more accustomed to the technology, they will be able to make improvements to it; this will, in turn, make the process of cloning a lot safer.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Inherited genetic diseases could also be cured through the means of altering the subjects genomes, however genetic screening has also shown potential as to ensure that an embryo days after conception does not contain a gene deemed harmful to its existence. Yet, despite having the potential solutions to many life endangering or crippling diseases, it is important to recognize that genetic technology holds a global influence on humankind and it is important decide whether the benefits that it may provide demand further development of this technology despite the sacrifices that will be made both ethically and culturally. The developments of modern medicine has made significant progress in the treating and curing of several diseases but still has various drawbacks. The task of treating a contagious disease across an entire population is difficult to say the least but the cost in both money and resources would be great. With the development of genetic technology a new solution may be possible.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Opponents also claim that procedures such as gene therapy can be extremely dangerous. For example, if the gene is inserted at the wrong position then it can result in expression in unusual ways. The newly created specie can also escape from laboratory and cause havoc in the society. Others have ethical issues regarding issues such as making genetic decisions regarding future generations without their consent. Other scientists share the concern about introducing genetic engineering in crops and other food materials which would result in development of increased herbicide and insecticide resistance and create a form of super weed.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays