Genetic Engineering Controversy

Improved Essays
On Tuesday, our small groups discussed the ethical dilemmas that revolved around genetic engineering and whether or not it should be banned. This topic fascinated me since it is a new emerging technology that could greatly affect the human population. Although this technology is only in its infancy, it has lots of controversy. When I first thought about this topic I wondered why anyone wouldn’t want this technology to advance: there is the potential for unprecedented positive effects like eliminating diseases such as cancer, hiv, and alzheimer's. Although there is potential for greatness, a lot of people don’t like the fact that humans are playing “God” or that it could lead to people abusing the powers of genetical engineering. There is some skepticism towards this topic, but benefits in my opinion outweigh the negatives and it seems illogical to suppress this technology. Creating a future where painful, deadly, and infectious diseases are eradicated seems ideal. With the advances of …show more content…
If no restrictions were made on this topic I think super armies would be created and richer folk would have babies that looked ideal and were immune to almost everything. This likely won’t happen and I think that governments around the world will have to come an agreement to regulate this technology. They will have to put regulations on it in order to not let this technolgy get out of hand. I think they should definitely limit its personal use until it is available to everyone at a moderate price. If governments don’t step in I think it people would abuse its powers and they would likely create a divide in the world: it would be a world where modified rich people are on top and unmodified poor people are on the bottom of the social and economic totem pole. That would be worst case scenario, and I think our world wouldn't get to that point since there would be too many protests against genetic

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If it's acceptable to modify one gene, why not two, or 20 or 200? At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone's specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? Given what we know about human nature, the development and commercial marketing of human genetic modification would likely spark a techno-eugenic rat-race. Even parents opposed to manipulating their children's genes would feel compelled to participate in this race, lest their offspring be left behind.”…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SUMMARY/PRECIS Professor Ronald Green of Dartmouth University, in his article, Building Baby from Genes Up, addresses the topic of whether or not genetic engineering is a viable technological advancement for our society to pursue and argues that although there are many potential drawbacks, the overall benefits of genetic engineering outweigh its downfalls. He supports this claim by addressing the variety of benefits that genetic engineering can offer, then by categorically refuting counterarguments and finally by presenting his opinion for why each downfall of genetic engineering is surmountable. Green’s purpose is to shed light on both sides of the argument when it comes to genetic engineering, while posing the idea that genetic engineering…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Could you imagine a world where we could create a better race of humans? I think that designer babies are an efficient way to create a better society where a smarter race of humans can rule, he world and we can make the world a better place. In the article “In Praise of Designer Babies” it says “Imagine you knew that you carried a gene for a debilitating illness. But doctors could go into your egg (or your spouse's) and remove that gene, enabling you to have a baby who, whatever other problems they might encounter through their lifetime, wouldn't have to worry about the illness.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nevertheless, human individuality would never allow for this to happen. Unless a few can get away with mass genocide and murder every individual who would not benefit their desire to homogenize a genetically modified population, society would never allow for each individual’s values to be forcibly stripped from their…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As a result, healthy embryos would be chosen. A problem is these genetic techniques are dangerous, unethical, and will cause societal problems. However, there could be regulations by the government that doctors could perform…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human Genes Dbq

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DNA DBQ Human genes should not be modified. First of all, the embryos who are unborn can’t give consent to have their genes modified(OI). Also, this may result in possible death for the embryo. Even though it is proven to make these altered kids smarter if they survive, they may not be normal. The national debt of the U.S is trillions of dollars(OI).…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By going ahead with gene modification this would allow us to know more about our genetic makeup, our weaknesses and our strengths. So, instead of diminishing our freedom it would give us the freedom of knowing more of what we are able to do and what we cannot do. The third concern is the fear that our social division will widen as the “affluent ‘buy’ more competitive abilities for their offspring” (Green 2). This could be catastrophic, however Green focused more on the positive side of things and states that this could also be “a tool for reducing the class divide” (Green 3). The fourth and final concern that Green addresses is religion and how this…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Eugenics Ethical Issues

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are many controversial issues throughout time that have risen and led countries to disagree to with one another worldwide. Eugenics and genetic engineering on humans is a topic that many believe crosses a major ethical boundary. Many scientists and ethicists believe that gene editing on human genes is unethical at certain degrees and it should not be done until the proper precautions have been overlooked and restrictions are made. Eugenics is the study of improving the qualities of the human species or human population, especially by such means where certain people with inheritable undesirable traits are discouraged from reproducing. Eugenics consists of selective breeding, the process of sterilization and last but not least, the manipulation…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of this advancement, parent’s “play God” and design their own offspring. The effects of this feat in medical science damages society. Man’s desire for control pushes genetic engineering in the wrong direction. Recent advancements in genetic engineering allow the prevention…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone’s specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? (Hayes 245).” In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” Richard Hayes argues against Ronald M. Green, a professor of Emeritus of Religion and of Ethics and Human Values at Dartmouth College, specifically responding to his essay about using genetic technology to change children’s DNA. Hayes, who holds a Ph.D. in Energy and Resource, which saluted the United States to ban human cloning worldwide, believes it would disrupt human nature and the human future.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Issues On Malaria

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This paper will discuss multiple ethical challenges that genetically…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is not without good reason, but how will humanity learn if it cannot try to push the boundaries. The reasons behind the illegality are the fact that it is dangerous, not much is known of the long term side effects, and the government doesn't want to anger the large amount of people that believe that it is unethical. In total, 15 countries have allowed genetic manipulation of humans on their countries claimed land(Gould, 1). Another reason enforcing the governments reasons for a ban is that there have been deaths caused from the lack of knowledge. Although it has been made illegal in many countries, there is a great deal of people who would like to see the ban lifted, so that as humans there can be progress as a…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to genetic engineering this saying comes to mind most disagreements are cause by different perceptions that create different realities. There is so many ways to viewpoints to technology that leave the question is there even a right and a wrong to the scientific advancement of new genetics. Truth is no matter what your stance is on genetics you cannot believe the best thing to do is have the scientists should stop the development or to believe what they 're doing is completely okay. Society tends to make a reality to what they assume is what the consequences will be while the scientist and government try to make a different reality. Genetic engineering have potential to perpetuate our disparities, the role responsibility and knowledge…

    • 1267 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Until the 1960’s, there was no real threat to the ethical foundation of humans from genetic engineering. Due to the increasingly popular experiments of cloning and modification after 1960, there was a steady increase in the risks and expectations from the new science. The leading researchers of the time wanted to continue working on the projects, but they knew if there were not guidelines in place to regulate the growing discipline, then it could be catastrophic for the welfare of everyone. In 1975, a group of 140 scientists and researchers met to discuss safety concerns and ethical considerations of the growing genetic modifications at the International Conference on Recombinant DNA Molecules in Asilomar, California( Photos from Asilomar…, n.d.). The scientists wanted to regulate what organisms could be modified.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genetic Engineering Debate

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Modification or alteration of deoxyribonucleic acid found in the chromosomes of a cell, otherwise known as genetic engineering, is beginning to grip more ground in the realm of scientific research and could possibly become a cornerstone for a completely technological future. With the growing curiosity and experimentation surrounding genetic engineering, there is also controversy sparking about the issue: should the government limit the research and abilities of genetic engineering? Not only has genetic engineering proven itself beneficial in the past, the results of experimental research studies reveal a promising future for gene splicing, gene therapy, and other forms of genetic modification. Despite the opinions and arguments of rather close-minded individuals, genetic engineering has evinced its true ability and need for limitless research allowed by the government.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics