Ronald M Green Building Baby From The Genes Up Analysis

Improved Essays
What if you had the choice to save an embryo would you do it if that meant you could have more than one child? Imagine you have a genetic disease and the only option to have children is using the in-vitro fertilization method. This means taking your viable embryos testing and choosing the one that is "healthy" without the disease to have a child while the others get disposed. But, what if you could save them by genetically modifying the DNA sequences using gene technology within the embryos to make it so that they no longer had the disease? Ronald M. Green the author of "Building Baby from the Genes Up” uses his experiences in biomedical ethics to tell his readers that the main reason as to why people are against genetic modifications is because …show more content…
Those that know that this a new technological advance will know that there will be many advantages along with the disadvantages. In this article Green’s main purpose is to tells us the many advantages of gene modification and why people should change their minds on this technological advance. One of the points he makes is the problem with using the in-vitro fertilization process to avoid genetic disease. The embryos that would be disposed during the picking and choosing of “healthy” embryos could potentially live for forty or fifty years without ever developing a genetic disease, and there is also chance that the embryo could even never develop the disease (Green 1). With this point Green is trying to prove that gene technology can provide more knowledge about genes allowing people to know more about an individuals’ embryos or genomes, what causes these diseases, and how to fix theses DNA …show more content…
He states that the four main concerns about gene manipulation are the effect of gene modification on the parents, our freedom, our social divisions, and people’s religions. The first concern is if parents will replace the love for their child “with a consumerist mentality that seeks perfection” (Green 2). Parents who wish for healthy children and have one born with disabilities love their child unconditionally regardless of having perfect genes. Gene modification would not change this fact because “that child is already remarkably influenced by the genes they inherit” (Green 3). The second concern is if our freedom will be diminished “by making us creatures of our genes or of our parents’ whims” (Green 2). By going ahead with gene modification this would allow us to know more about our genetic makeup, our weaknesses and our strengths. So, instead of diminishing our freedom it would give us the freedom of knowing more of what we are able to do and what we cannot do. The third concern is the fear that our social division will widen as the “affluent ‘buy’ more competitive abilities for their offspring” (Green 2). This could be catastrophic, however Green focused more on the positive side of things and states that this could also be “a tool for reducing the class divide” (Green 3). The fourth and final concern that Green addresses is religion and how this

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Imagine this; a world where no one has lifelong infections or medical conditions. This might be made possible soon; however, some are afraid that parents will take it too far. With enough money, they could transform their babies to be intelligent and good looking. In my opinion, genetic engineering should be allowed, but restrictions should be in place to stop parents from making super babies. Genetic engineering is the purposeful changing of an organism's DNA.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Gene Editing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We, as a society, should always be moving forward and bettering ourselves, but is genetic manipulation the best way to do it? Gene editing can help cure fatal diseases in children however it could be possible for parents to choose their children’s personality traits. Science should be used to better a person’s life, not determine it. It is not a moral obligation of a parent to screen out “personality flaws” but it is a parent’s moral obligation if they want to cure their child of sickle cell disease and save the child from a painful and possibly shortened life. It is wrong for parents and scientists to play God, except in the instance it could save the child from suffering.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gene Therapy Cons

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Walters and Palmer believe that genetic treatment may be the only way to avoid many genetic disorders for some people. When an embryo undergoes germ-line therapy early enough, the embryo has a great potential to prevent irreparable damage to the developing embryo and thus be disease free. However, it then causes all cells of the embryo to be genetically modified. Germ-line therapy, as previously stated, prevents the transmission of genetic diseases through the generations, unlike somatic cell therapy. It is then more efficient to undergo germ-line therapy than somatic cell therapy.…

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Brandon) With Designer babies scientists can extract defective mitochondria and put healthy mitochondria back in. Can now catch errors in number of chromosomes. Designer babies aren’t that unique in an ethical perspective, just as parents hire tutors, coaches and music lessons to get certain traits. A family really wants there kid to share the same hobbies " if they have four embryos and one has the perfect pitch trait, then why should they nit be able to choose that embryo?"…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If science can find a way to harness the power of stem cells we could potentially cure many diseases that we currently have no fix for just a way to prolong a person’s life with the disease. Why would we deprive millions of people of something that could save their lives and save their families grief? “In principle, embryonic stem cells can be expanded and then differentiated into most cells lineages of a living organism” (Carson, Christian T). When they say in principle this means it is not a…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It should not be a right that a person could progress with this idea because the lives of many rely on his hands. The human genome project in general should be made public, like what the National Human Genome Research Institute is trying to accomplish to prevent people and organizations such as the one in this situation from continuing. However, this brings up the issue of who should be genetically tested and who will have entry to the subsequent data. Parents in presence of the birth of their newborn should be securely encouraged to have their child undergo genetic testing. The reason to this idea is that although both parents may appear healthy, babies should go through newborn screening because it is better to be safe than sorry when taking a glance at possible DNA errors.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is extremely important because it is shown to help more than treatment provided after birth (Knapton). The issue though, with this is the expansion of genetic testing from diseases that can be treated to diseases where there is nothing to be done (Timmermans). In the past. many diseases could be treatable - which provides a reason for the testing. “Screening for phenylketonuria, for example, has meant that newborns affected by the condition can be placed on a special diet in the first days of life, thereby preventing mental retardation” (Timmermans).…

    • 1060 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, advances in genetic modification through germ-line therapy could allow parents to genetically engineer their children, making them more intelligent, attractive and removing predispositions for disease (Ward, 2009). This type of genetic modification allows the production of an offspring which is more fit to survive without relying on chance to produce the perfect combination of parent genes. If foreign genes which do not belong to either parent are used to improve the offspring, the concept of inherited traits is also rendered obsolete. People can take control of their evolution by choosing their genes and the genes of their children, something which no other organism has the ability to do. Due to the fact that…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The thing is just because two people share the same genetic coding does not mean that the DNA coding both people manifest in the same way. Basically, this means that a person’s clone could look nothing like them even though they are genetically the same. This is because the genetic markers may end up lining up differently (3) The idea that clones would affect family dynamics. This assertion is mind boggling. The cloned child is not the original and so the family dynamics need not be any different than they would be if the woman had given birth to a child that was conceived with two parents (4) Cloning opens the door to…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But here is where moral questions arise because some embryos are discarded. Personally, I believe that the potential to eradicate such devastating syndromes that are otherwise unpreventable, outweighs the loss of the other embryos. In a perfect world, embryos would not have to be sacrificed, but luckily, at the point when their genes are tested, they are only a conglomerate of cells, a zygote, with no resemblance to even the beginnings of a human being. So, when it comes to disease prevention and eradication, genetic modification should be pursued. However, many individuals believe that through using genetic engineering, it is okay to create the perfect child who has tall genes, smart genes, handsome genes, and so on.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays