Direct Social And Ethical Implications Of Genetic Engineering

Improved Essays
When it comes to genetic engineering this saying comes to mind most disagreements are cause by different perceptions that create different realities. There is so many ways to viewpoints to technology that leave the question is there even a right and a wrong to the scientific advancement of new genetics. Truth is no matter what your stance is on genetics you cannot believe the best thing to do is have the scientists should stop the development or to believe what they 're doing is completely okay. Society tends to make a reality to what they assume is what the consequences will be while the scientist and government try to make a different reality. Genetic engineering have potential to perpetuate our disparities, the role responsibility and knowledge …show more content…
Lama characterizes knowledge and responsibility by having more knowledge you have more responsibility meaning you have to be educated to be able to question genetics correctly. Leaving the technology to businessman and scientist is not helping us and is actually hurting us because we are leaving the moral line for them to find out. If this technology is going to change humanity then humanity should have a …show more content…
For instance, the drug Levaquin a common antibiotic have horrible side effects like pain and both legs and shoulders or even death but the doctors didn’t know until people starting dying after using it. The company that made the drug was accused of hiding the effects and the company actually they didn’t really cover the truth if you did your research before taking it.
Therapeutic cloning should be researches as well. Based on my knowledge scientist can make clones but can also make just the organs. Who are we to play God and make a human being yet scientist believe it’s the way to the future. "such a moral compass must entail preserving our human sensitivity and will depend on us constantly bearing in mind our fundamental human values." (Dalai Lama 139) If they perceive their "experiments" as beings we would even be questioning the nature of cloning because then they would only be creating organs and not people just to be like harvesting vessels for another human

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Those that know that this a new technological advance will know that there will be many advantages along with the disadvantages. In this article Green’s main purpose is to tells us the many advantages of gene modification and why people should change their minds on this technological advance. One of the points he makes is the problem with using the in-vitro fertilization process to avoid genetic disease. The embryos that would be disposed during the picking and choosing of “healthy” embryos could potentially live for forty or fifty years without ever developing a genetic disease, and there is also chance that the embryo could even never develop the disease (Green 1). With this point Green is trying to prove that gene technology can provide more knowledge about genes allowing people to know more about an individuals’ embryos or genomes, what causes these diseases, and how to fix theses DNA…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because of this advancement, parent’s “play God” and design their own offspring. The effects of this feat in medical science damages society. Man’s desire for control pushes genetic engineering in the wrong direction. Recent advancements in genetic engineering allow the prevention…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone’s specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? (Hayes 245).” In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” Richard Hayes argues against Ronald M. Green, a professor of Emeritus of Religion and of Ethics and Human Values at Dartmouth College, specifically responding to his essay about using genetic technology to change children’s DNA. Hayes, who holds a Ph.D. in Energy and Resource, which saluted the United States to ban human cloning worldwide, believes it would disrupt human nature and the human future.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    SUMMARY/PRECIS Professor Ronald Green of Dartmouth University, in his article, Building Baby from Genes Up, addresses the topic of whether or not genetic engineering is a viable technological advancement for our society to pursue and argues that although there are many potential drawbacks, the overall benefits of genetic engineering outweigh its downfalls. He supports this claim by addressing the variety of benefits that genetic engineering can offer, then by categorically refuting counterarguments and finally by presenting his opinion for why each downfall of genetic engineering is surmountable. Green’s purpose is to shed light on both sides of the argument when it comes to genetic engineering, while posing the idea that genetic engineering…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While many are against the practice for moral reasons and its effects on research, there are some who believe that these issues are not as large as suggested at first glance. Crichton argues that gene patenting is wrong and immoral. But should morals dictate our ability to conduct research and shouldn’t those who have put in the work be compensated in some way for their effort to advance our understanding of the world around us? However, one cannot help notice that the argument for gene patenting fails to actually make a convincing argument stating mostly that the problems behind gene patenting are simply not as bad as one might think. But does this not mean that there are problems however small, nonetheless; and that things would be better if the patents had never been issued in the first…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Listening for the Public Voice, by Robert Cook-Deegan and Jane Maienschein, discusses the issue of genetic engineering and the ethical dilemma and how the United States, government, and people are interacting in the struggle of the ethics behind genetic engineering. The authors present the facts that genetic engineering has laid in the grey area forever, and still continues to sit in that grey area. Genetic Engineering will occasionally find itself in the news and the argument reignites but falls flat within a couple of weeks waiting till the next breakthrough arises. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein stats some of the most recent progress in genetic engineering, which brings into perspective the relevance, development, and the possibility that soon…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The development of this technology will lead to a society gap between those who are genetically enhanced and those who have “natural genes”. Additionally, this manipulation will also deprive a child from its natural rights and will cause hardships in the future. Lastly, genetic engineering has the potential of ending the life of the embryo due to its relatively new technology. This manipulation of genes will result in catastrophic outcomes that will harm…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Eugenics Ethical Issues

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are many controversial issues throughout time that have risen and led countries to disagree to with one another worldwide. Eugenics and genetic engineering on humans is a topic that many believe crosses a major ethical boundary. Many scientists and ethicists believe that gene editing on human genes is unethical at certain degrees and it should not be done until the proper precautions have been overlooked and restrictions are made. Eugenics is the study of improving the qualities of the human species or human population, especially by such means where certain people with inheritable undesirable traits are discouraged from reproducing. Eugenics consists of selective breeding, the process of sterilization and last but not least, the manipulation…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the new ability to 'shape our evolution' many ethical questions will form and boundaries will become necessary. The original goal of gene therapy was to "cure hereditary diseases, not make any one person or race superior" (Fleck, 1998). However, once humans have the ability to edit out undesirable traits in themselves and their children many complex issues will arise. Overtime, scientists may learn about genes associated with intelligence, health, longevity, and other appealing traits. There will be numerous unknown consequences, many of which humanity is not currently prepared to…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is the process of therapeutic cloning? The process of therapeutic cloning is removing a nucleus from an abhorrent cell and moving the nucleus into an unfertilized egg, which develops an exact replica of the parent cell, this is then called a clone. The purpose of therapeutic cloning is to strengthen the cells within the body. With the process of therapeutic cloning this then allows the cells to cure diseases that have not been cured yet, this then would allow humanity in the future to be stronger by helping us have a more health advantage. Although, therapeutic cloning is very helpful some people are opposed to it due to the fact that it is unethical in some ways.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leon R. Kass Analysis

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Leon R. Kass claims that genetic engineering will threaten human dignity. By that he means that our sense of human dignity will slowly start corrupting. According to him, blind faith in genetic engineering and scientific advancement has placed scientists in a position where they play God. They are defining health of humanity and which babies get to live or not. Genetic scientists say they are improving human life.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Genetic Manipulation

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In “Building Baby from the Genes Up”, Ronald Green argues that investing time and consolidating in genomic science and gene technology will lessen diseases, boost lifespan, improve cognitive functioning, and perhaps contribute to cosmetics enhancements, such as orthodontics. Green addresses the common concerns many people have such as; genetic selection on parenting, being made for the use our substantial genes, the social division will increase. and religious connotation of this technology. Though Green acknowledges and accepts the skeptic concerns, he feels gene technology will be in the future. Nevertheless, while Green brings up good points, his argument is weak.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think a plant, animal, or even a human can be cloned? If so, would you be a support or oppose it? Genetic Cloning has many titles; from human cloning, Reproductive cloning, Therapeutic cloning or even Research cloning. They all mean the same thing, which is the process in which a gene of interest is located and copied out of DNA extracted from an organism. Genetic Cloning has been going on for years, ever since 1981.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The risks can cause great controversy and people start to question is genetic engineering actually good or can it lead to a major source of…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Although there are certainly advantages of genetic engineering, the risks far outweigh these benefits. Maybe the future described at the beginning of this paper isn 't far off. Maybe it is. Maybe concerns about the dangers of genetic engineering are totally unfounded. But, as they say, it 's better to be safe than…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays