Compare And Contrast Lincoln And Frederick Douglass

Improved Essays
The outcome of the Civil War marked the unity of the Union and Confederates as one nation. Antislavery politics and radical reform movement were on the same side when it came to the idea of opposing slavery but each organization had their own beliefs. Fredrick Douglass was the leader of the radical reform while President Abraham Lincoln served as the political head of the antislavery reform. Although, theses two leaders didn’t “see eye to eye” on the goal of the war they both wanted to end the inhuman slavery system for once and for all. Douglass and Lincoln had different motives for wanting to abolish slavery. Douglass knew the hardship of being part of the slavery system from first hand experience, although, during this time he was a “free …show more content…
The Republicans wanted to solve the problem through antislavery legislation while the radical reformers were quickly rash calling to go to war (94). These were the different ideology of the organizations that influence the methods that Lincoln and Douglass used to abolish slavery. Douglass was impulsive and narrow minded in the sense he only saw one solution to slavery which was the unions going into. As for Lincoln he was the President of the United States who had principles to uphold (132). For instance, he had to make sure the people were satisfied because the United States is base on the Constitution; in which a right is that the United States is for the people and the United States. This gave the people the authority over who could stay in office or be impeached. Therefore, he couldn’t be rash because he wants the union to be a whole regardless of the issue plus he was the face of America. Instead he projected his approach through his …show more content…
Lincoln tried to implement multiple antislavery policies to satisfy these states. He was able to rebuke the Fugitive Slave Act, which made slaves as an illegal import. The slaves from the south were given their freedom. Although, this was a good thing Douglass wasn’t satisfied he wanted national emancipation. The republican tried to solve problems without violence at first before such measures. During the war blacks enter the army to help the north. This was an advantage for the north because they had people who were passionate for what they were fighting for. At first Lincoln try not to use his power as commander and chief to issue the emancipation of slaves but at the end he did when he was reelected. The radicals finally got what they long proceeded for. Blacks soon became worried again when Lincoln was assassinated and Johnson took over. They were not allowed to vote, which brought them back to the same place they were before. Soon the fourteenth amendment came in place, which let the African Americans progress in society (263). Both radical and reforms were fighting for the same cause; even though they had different ideas to meet its end. The radicals fueled and applied pressure on the antislavery legislator to change the nation. As a result, the nation became one whole due to the actions of Lincoln and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Two men, born nearly a hundred years apart, each seeking revolutionary changes in the United States in ways suited to their society and circumstances. Frederick Douglass and Malcolm X were monumental and influential and prominent (pattern c) figures in American history. In the books Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass and The Autobiography of Malcolm X, (pattern B) both Douglass and Malcolm used their extraordinary oratorical skills and charisma to object to the systematic oppression and subjugation that was imposed on African-Americans. The philosophy of Douglass and Malcolm is characterized by the similarities and differences of their views on education, Christianity, and slavery.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the election of 1860, the Republican Abraham Lincoln won the election. A surprising fact is that he did not get any votes from the south. He believed that slavery can’t be just stopped at once, but it should not be able to spread in the new territories. However, the southern misunderstand President Abraham Lincoln and considered him as a danger against the practice of slavery. Thus, the southern criticized the Abraham Lincoln’s…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frederick Douglass and Abraham Lincoln embody heros because they underwent many challenges in order to fight for liberty and freedom for all. The journey to freedom and liberty was treacherous for Lincoln and Douglass, for example, Douglass attended an abolitionist convention in Nantucket in 1841 at which a man named William C. Collin encouraged him to speak. However Douglass strongly opposed, revealing that, “the truth was, I felt myself a slave, and the idea of speaking to white people weighed me down” (SB pg 72). Contrary to his fears of feeling inferior to the audience, he went through with a speech and later became a large catalyst in the abolishment of slavery. However, heroism is not entirely about courage, dedication is also a vital…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leading up to the Civil War, the government tried to keep the union in tact, but, the people were too divided to make any effort to fix it. Certain laws, movements, and articles were passed helped one side or the other, and did not benefit the union as a whole. These included the Fugitive Slave Act, the Massachusetts Personal Liberty Law, the movement in Kkansas, as well as articles written in the Chicago Tribune. The North and the South’s lack of compromise, was the onset of the Civil War.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As previously mentioned, the introduction of the Nebraska Act propelled Lincoln to take a more aggressive stance on slavery. In a way, the Nebraska Act is what potentially placed Lincoln on the presidential trail. Perhaps Abraham Lincoln was of like mind with John Stuart Mill who said, “Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing”. Lincoln had fought against slavery within Congress, he had made valid attempts to try and do what was right, but enough was enough. The nation was being led down a path that Lincoln did not agree with, by men more concerned with themselves than with those they were meant to serve.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The period in American history from 1820 to 1860 lead to a divided nation on the brink of a civil war. One thing dividing the nation of America between 1820 and 1860 was the rise of many different political parties and the issue of states’ rights. Each politician was working for he advancement of the same country, yet had wildly different beliefs. For example, Senator John C. Calhoun of SOuth Carolina said, “We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions,” when talking about slavery (Document A). While he was preaching the continuation with slavery, Democratic Congressman David Wilmot from Pennsylvania said, “The issue now presented is not whether slavery shall exist unmolested where it now is, but whether it shall be carried to new and distant regions, now free, where the footprint of a slave cannot be found” (Documented B).…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They were worried about slavery spreading into the North which led to Lincoln’s election. This ties to the Civil War, because after Abraham Lincoln was elected, the Civil War was started to help pursue…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Civil War was a very important war in shaping the course of American history. Tensions between the North and the South led to a distinctive divide between the two regions, which each one failing to comply with the other’s demands. While one side would support a certain cause, the other would completely disagree with it. As these disagreements heightened, it became clear that African Americans were the center of discussion, but more importantly, slavery. African Americans became a key part of the events that would lead up to the war, and the events which would follow years later.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In The Radical and the Republican: Frederick Douglass, Abraham Lincoln, and the Triumph of Antislavery Politics, the author, James Oakes, articulates Abraham Lincolns and Frederick Douglass’s attitudes in regard to the issue of abolition and the freedom of slaves. Whilst Frederick Douglass was inactive in politics, he was a radical heavily engaged in the abolition of slavery. On the other hand, Andrew Jackson was a diligent Republican politician who had strong notions towards the enslavement of blacks. Although they came from different backgrounds and had divergent idealistic views, ultimately they joined forces to fight for the implementation of the emancipation and the nullification of slavery.…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages

    His approach towards the South in terms of being too lenient with them was evident when, “President Lincoln had authorized loyalist governments in Virginia, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Tennessee as the Union came to control large parts of those states and advocated a ten percent plan that would allow elections after ten percent of the voters in any state took an oath of future loyalty to the Union,” (Fitzgerald). For many members in Congress, this was considered as too lenient and it did not warrant all voters in rebellion states to take an oath of allegiance to the Union. From this inception, we can speculate that the future political moves of the country would come at the expense of not properly insuring the protection and freedoms of formerly enslaved African Americans in the South. It also comes to no surprise that some historians have deemed the Reconstruction era as a “shameful period in American history.” Stammp states that, “various historians have called this phase of American history ‘The Tragic Era,’ ‘The Dreadful Decade,’ and the ‘Blackout of Honest Government,” (p. 4).…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many abolitionists were trying to abolish slavery. One famous example was Abraham Lincoln and he attempted to make up civil rights. There was also a big dispute on weather slaves were considered property. A famous case was the Dread Scott Case and the democrats who felt that slaves were property led the Supreme Court.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mexican War Dbq

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This new party was formed when many northern Democrats became fixated on keeping slavery out of Kansas, Nebraska, and all other territories. The leader of this party was Abraham Lincoln, who felt that no man had the right to own another man. The Republicans recognized that the constitution protected the slave states; however, they felt that the prevention of slavery moving westward would be the first step to its eventual diminishment. This led to a new compromise being made, which was the Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the constitution was written, The United States did not give clear guidelines about slavery. As a result, this was a reason why slavery became such a heated political issue. It was a growing crisis that consumed the entire American nation and lead to the fighting over the future of slavery. There were many factors that caused the American Civil War in 1861, such as the Kansas Nebraska Act, the Compromise of 1850, the Transcontinental Railroad, and the Presidental Election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860, which formed a new political party.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Radical and the Republican by James Oakes is a historical retelling about the struggle of two men, Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass, to put an end to slavery and the formation of their partnership that led to the ending of slavery. Both men came from vastly different backgrounds, but both strongly believed that slaves should be emancipated and given the benefits from their hard labor. However, in the beginning, their similarities ended there and they were not willing to be friends nor partners. Oakes argues that things could not remain this way due to the need for the passionate reformation and impulsive nature of Douglass paired with the practical political leadership that was exemplified by Lincoln were needed to finally liberate…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He states that even though you are free, you are not truly free until you find freedom within yourself. Douglass had a hard life, but he never let that stop him from finding his freedom. In fact he would not rest until he found his freedom within himself. His worldview was very different from Franklin’s. Douglass viewed the world as a slave, from the bottom of the food chain.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays