1820 To 1860 Dbq Essay

Great Essays
Americans during the early nineteenth century were trying to reach for compromise to solve their political disputes, but by 1860 compromise seemed unattainable. The years between 1820 and 1860 were a time of vast change for the newly free colonies and each citizen had different ideas on what advancements from there would look like. All the disputes revolved around one thing: slavery. The issue proved to be explosive by 1860 when the nation realized the Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850, which were passed to bring a sense of unity, seemed to be done in vain as they hardly made a dent in the issues at hand. Voters joined political parties and voted for officials based on their attitudes toward slavery, the issue caused sectional divides between the North and South, and different cultural events …show more content…
The period in American history from 1820 to 1860 lead to a divided nation on the brink of a civil war.
One thing dividing the nation of America between 1820 and 1860 was the rise of many different political parties and the issue of states’ rights. Each politician was working for he advancement of the same country, yet had wildly different beliefs. For example, Senator John C. Calhoun of SOuth Carolina said, “We of the South will not, cannot, surrender our institutions,” when talking about slavery (Document A). While he was preaching the continuation with slavery, Democratic Congressman David Wilmot from Pennsylvania said, “The issue now presented is not whether slavery shall exist unmolested where it now is, but whether it shall be carried to new and distant regions, now free, where the footprint of a slave cannot be found” (Documented B). He did not want slavery contaminating any other parts of the nation. This divide in the leaders of America set a poor example. The variance in political platforms of candidates was also present The Election of 1828. John Quincy Adams wanted an expanded national

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ap Us History Dbq

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The cultural content deriving from “sectional differences” within the United States began in the 1850’s when authoritive country leaders disagreeably debated on forcibly expanding slavery into western territories. Document A is the outlining intentions of Abraham Lincoln, his proactive ideologist of restricting the westward slavery expansion and eliminating ownership of individual commodities. Document B is the socially counterproductive immediate successional actionable causes of Mississippi that describe the slaveholding states property and ownership, expansion intentions of slavery in addition to provoking the sectional crisis. The intentions of these highly recognizable political events became a turning point in the U.S. history were traditional…

    • 340 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery and Westward Expansion had a very volatile relationship in the Antebellum era America and would contribute to the American Civil War. Westward expansion and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be a way to preserve unity within the Union, but over the next 30 years, ties between the Northern and Southern states would be strained as more territory is gained and the question regarding slavery’s place within these new lands. Through an analysis of book and article sources, one gains the idea that Westward expansion, slavery, and the place of Africans and their rights would continue to tear away at the union until it was ripped apart when South Carolina secedes from the Union and is followed by six more states after the election of President…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1895-1920s Dbq Essay

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What typically motivates people to do anything? Self-Interest, and America did not fall short of this characteristic throughout the following years: 1895-1920. There were always hidden causes in America’s actions such as land, money, and power, which were strong influences in the young World Power’s influences. This is evident through the imperialistic nature of America always growing and needing somewhere to further its claws, the demand from the ever growing economic system, and the power that radiated from the growing nation, and even the president. Once America became aware of its strength, the wish to ‘expand’ became merely only a part of America’s natural tendency.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The years following 1850 proved to be a time of political turmoil in the United States. With slavery still being utilized in the South, it seemed that the Northern and Southern politicians would always be at odds. This opposition would always exist between the North and South so long as slavery existed. During the period preceding the Compromise of 1850 politicians were able to formulate compromises that barely appeased both sides. Eventually there was nothing else to do to satisfy both sides of the country.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this time period, America was beyond split over Slavery and antislavery. Many Political parties…

    • 2077 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Long-Term Effects Of Slavery

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Northerners and Southerners expressed entirely different views of the American Promise and the place of slavery within it. These differences crystallized into political form when David Wilmot proposed banning slavery in any territory won in the Mexican-American War. When Wilmot proposed and submitted his amendment, he did not foresee that the debate he unleashed would end up in Civil war just fifteen years later. A lot of controversies spurred up, and congress attempted to address these issues with the Compromise of 1850, but the fugitive Slave Act and the publication of Uncle Tom’s Cabin hardened northern sentiments against slavery an confirmed southern suspicions of northern ill will. Americans could no longer continue its journey as a nation half slave and half free.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A recurring theme that is explored throughout the topic of the politics of emancipation is politics and power. In this topic, the path to the complete emancipation of slaves in America is explored, as well as the changes in Republican ideology that led to emancipation becoming a fundamental part of the war. A division had formed in the Republican party over the process of abolishing slavery. Republicans who held a more radical perspective such as Senator Charles Sumner on emancipation, believed that the war should be used to achieve the abolition of slavery, while the group of conservative group of Republicans favored emancipation as the result of a gradual process that was less destructive. Lincoln himself hesitated at the possibility of a…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the 1850s, slavery, and other political issues between the states, became a sizable issue. Slavery began to dissect people. For example, the Northerners began to begin support free soil and abolition. However, the Southerners disagreed, and tension increased dramatically. Soon, the Southern slaveowners felt that their rights were no longer being illustrated, and felt that they must succeed (secession is the act of withdrawing from an organization, union, military alliance or especially a political entity, to be protected from Northern abuse.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What did national parties often do to maintain national unity in regards to the slavery issue? Generally-speaking, the national parties essentially turned a blind eye towards the slavery issue, in order to bar further tensions from erupting. Portrayed in yet another manner, such parties, whether it be the Whigs or Democrats alike, failed to explicitly embrace the issue by adopting a particular standpoint. Evidence from the text that further bolsters this claim is shown when the authors state, “To politicians, the wisest strategy seemed to be to sit on the lid of the slavery issue and ignore the boiling beneath.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: How did slavery affect politics between 1800 and 1860? This time era is the pre-civil war era in America. The tensions were quite high between these years only growing tighter. The North was doing all it could to stop the South and its expansion of slavery into the new western territories. The main political goal of the North was in fact to stop the expansion of slavery not abolish it from the South.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For every major issue in history there were people who publically supported it and people who publically disagreed with it. One of the biggest issues in the 1800s in American history was slavery and whether or not it should be abolished. Some people thought it was necessary for America to function and prosper and others knew that it was wrong and people shouldn’t be owned or treated as less than what they were; humans. Politicians used this topic as a platform to gain the peoples support. Two politicians that are well known today for debating this issue were Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first half of the 19th Century a young United States began to face many conflicts regarding civil rights as well as continuous opposing views between the North and South. One of the more prevalent issues at the time, even though both the Democratic and Whig parties attempted to avoid talking about it, was regarding the institution of slavery and whether or not it was “right”. Another issue that arose was whether or not the country would go to war with Mexico after Democrat, and current president at the time, James K. Polk went to Congress with a declaration of war with the claim that, on American soil, Mexico had caused the shedding of American blood. Furthermore, the war against Mexico would eventually ignite the debate of slavery even…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To some extent, Southern slave-owners used the concept of state rights as a tool to justify outright racism. However, some were genuinely concerned about the role of the federal government. According to Jeff Schweitzer, slavery was the “central point of contention” in the Civil War, but the issue also extended to a disagreement over who should “decide whether slavery [is] acceptable, local institutions or a distant central government power” (Huffington Post). Disagreement over this very conflict is what characterized politics in the antebellum period. Southerners, particularly slave-owners, generally supported the Democratic Party, which was based in “states’ rights, strict construction of the Constitution, limited federal government, and the guardianship of slavery” (Beachler).…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed. Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction During the 1800s the North and South came to a crossroads; their outlooks on slavery were rather diverse. The South did not wish to lose its moneymaking, comfortable, and rapacious slavery industry, especially plantation slavery. However, on the other hand, the North was rising up with a sense of conviction toward the nature of slavery. The South pursued the expansion of slavery and the North sought its abolishment. Slavery was the most disputed subject in that time.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays