The Controversy Of The Kansas-Nebraska Act

Decent Essays
Understand how the controversy of the Kansas-Nebraska Act led to the birth of the modern day Republican Party. The controversy of the Kansas-Nebraska Act that was passed on May 20, 1854, was regarding the practice of popular sovereignty which allowed the white people in the two territories to vote if they desired to allow slavery or abolish slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was introduced by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois who wanted to build a transcontinental railroad through Chicago. However, it violated the Missouri compromise which prohibited the practice of slavery on the Louisiana Purchase north of the latitude 36°30′. With the purpose of increasing votes and winning a majority, the north and south crossed the border into the two territories to vote for or against slavery. The northerners were called Free-Soilers and the southerners were called border ruffians. Thus, several conflicts arose between the two sides which led to the …show more content…
The new party was mainly led by anti-slavery Whigs and some northern anti-slavery Democrats. The main focus of the Republican Party was preventing the practice of slavery into the new expanding territories. They also showed interest in federal funding for the transcontinental railroad and other transportation improvements. Due to slavery, they were trying the keep the Missouri Compromise from repealing. The first Republican candidate running for president election lost against the Democrat James Buchanan. In the election of 1860, the Republican Abraham Lincoln won the election. A surprising fact is that he did not get any votes from the south. He believed that slavery can’t be just stopped at once, but it should not be able to spread in the new territories. However, the southern misunderstand President Abraham Lincoln and considered him as a danger against the practice of slavery. Thus, the southern criticized the Abraham Lincoln’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Lincoln’s election outraged many southerners” (Smith). They reject the idea of sucumming to a president that was in accordance with republican ideology. Their ideology happening to be the abolishment of slavery. They lost the power to accumulate the number of slave states because the North preferred an equal amount of slave states to Free states. The south also thought that this was going to influence Lincoln’s decisions over the issue, which many were right to believe for his “growing opposition led him to introduce a law that gradually ended slavery” (Smith).…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abraham Lincoln was elected on 6 November 1860 and his election played a role in the abolishment of slavery. Before Lincoln was elected he was open about his views about slavery. Abraham Lincoln believed that slavery was immoral and shouldn’t exist in America. Abraham did not have any supporters in the Southern States of the States at they were pro slavery as slaves worked on their plantations and essential for their economy. The northern states however supported the abolishment of slavery.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These states were very dependent on agriculture and abolishing slavery would certainly hurt them. Lincoln rejected their decision and then war was declared between The Union and the Confederacy. The Confederacy fought and died to keep slavery, however 4 years after the union became successful. Abraham Lincoln fought for the freedom and human rights of the blacks, while he also fought to keep the united states together as a union. This war did not only accomplish the abolishment of slavery, it accomplished union in the states, kept a strong country growing together In the election of 1860 Abraham Lincoln ran for president and when on to become the first republican candidate to win an election.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Social Changes

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While, “Northerners believed that slavery would escape from Dixie and corrupt and possibly break down the political and constitutional system” (xxiv). The nation was divided into two political parties, Democrats and the Republicans. The Republicans sought to end slavery, while the Democrats opposed to this idea. Slavery has torn the two political parties apart. The election of Abraham Lincoln, a member of the Republican party, had significantly pushed the start of the war, because the South took this election as a…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The debate over which powers rightly belonged to the states and which to the Federal Government became heated again in the 1820s and 1830s fueled by the divisive issue of whether slavery would be allowed in the new territories forming as the nation expanded westward.” (Trigger Events Of the Civil War). The North believed that the Federal Government held the power to rule slavery legal or not while the South believed that this power rightfully belonged to the states. The South wanted to be able to declare slavery legal because the majority of the South used slave labor. The debate over the ability for a territory to make slavery legal or illegal was a state right that eventually led to the Civil…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Slavery Causes

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages

    However, after the Civil War, Southerner leaders, Neo-Confederates and some revisionists historians downplayed the importance of slavery as the main cause of the Civil War. Instead these critics have surmised that a multitude of causes centered around various social and economic sectional differences as well as state’s rights theories that eventually lead to war. Regardless of these claims, the preservation of slavery and white superiority are ultimately the underlying lynch pins at the core of these theories that economic, political or social differences were the causes of the Civil War. Moreover, to ensure Southern secession, Southern leaders protected this racially motivated system by spreading fear of racial equality, war between the races and amalgamation of the races at the hands of Northerners who opposed slavery. Southern leaders later deflected their attempts to maintain their race based social and economic hierarchy with theories of states’ rights and sectional differences after their defeat in the Civil…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The President of the United States at the time, would have created further tensions between the North and the South. One of the final events which came a year before the start of the American Civil War in 1861, was the 1860 election in which Abraham Lincoln became the new President. Lincoln was seen as an abolitionist, suggesting that he wanted to abolish slavery however it was not until 1864, that he officially announced that he wanted to abolish slavery in his 13th Amendment. As a result of Lincoln’s presidency, the South decided that their only option was to secede, as they did not believe in what Lincoln thought about slavery. Lincoln had to ensure that the laws were being carried out with fair practice, however this had the disapproval of slaves.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fugitive Slave Act caused an angry uproar amongst northerners. Senator Daniel Webster believed the Compromise of 1850 was the only hope to save the nation. In his 1850 speech to the Senate, he asserted his beliefs by criticizing the North’s refusal to follow the Fugitive Slave Act thereby violating the Compromise of 1850 (Doc D). If the Northerners would not respect the clauses of the Compromise of 1850, then compromise would never work. .…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Free-Soil Party

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The slogan “Free Soil, Free Speech, Free Labor, Free Men!” was associated with the Free-Soilers, a political party that began in the north leading up to the Civil War. While not specifically an abolitionist group, the party focused on legislation that would block slavery in the expanded United States territories following the Mexican-American War, and as such provided a catalyst to both the abolitionist movement and southern desire for secession. Though short-lived, the Free-Soil Party was significant in American history due to the increased attention it brought to the specific issue of the expansion of slavery and to slave legislation as a whole; the pronounced reflection it gave to the broadening north/south divide; and its seeding of Lincoln’s…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled that his stay in the Northwest territory did not make him a free man once he returned to Missouri. The Court also ruled that African American were excluded from the United States citizenship and was not considered to be a part of the “sovereign people” that makes up the Constitution. Lastly the Supreme Court ruled that Congress did not have the right to prohibit slavery in any territory therefore the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. The northerners were not willing to accept the Court’s decision because they felt that it was dominated by pro-slavery…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays