Negative Effects Of Electoral Voting System

Improved Essays
The Negative Effects of the Winner-Take-All Method
In the current US election system, citizens do not directly vote for their next president. Instead, a group called the Electoral College carries out that function. Citizens cast their votes and those votes are tallied up by state. Once tallied, the Electors, also known as Representatives, of the states place their votes. Each state has a certain amount of electoral votes. All of the electoral votes of that state count toward whoever won the state. This is known as the Winner-Take-All method. Whichever candidate has the most electoral votes wins the election, regardless of who had the majority of the popular vote. If neither has the majority of electoral votes, in a presidential election, then the House of Representatives chooses the next president. The Winner-Take-All method has many negative effects.
One negative effect is that all states are not treated equally. Swing states, also called battleground states, have an almost equal amount of supporters for both major party candidates. As a result, both candidates focus more on campaigning in these states than in others. According to
…show more content…
Our current election system functions as a two-party system, and only Democratic or Republican candidates have a chance of winning the presidency. Thus, according to Bugh, non-major party candidates do not have a chance of winning the election (51). Hill said this is because “they are a minority perspective competing in a majoritarian Winner Take All system that rewards the highest vote-getters, which, by definition, is not usually a minority” (53). According to David Gillespie, a political science professor, there are about three well-known third parties, but there are also many more minor parties (229-232). As a result of the current system, these parties will most likely never get a chance to have a candidate win the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Since results are based on the number of electoral votes and not the number of popular votes, presidential candidates can still win the election even if the nation voted for the other candidate. If the popular votes counted instead of the electoral ones, the candidate we wanted would win, not the one that won because he had the votes of larger states. Problems with representation are also caused by the differing number of votes that states receive because of population. Noble said that there is one electoral vote in California for every 705,454 people. While in Wyoming, there’s one electoral vote for every 194,717 people.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Vote

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Electoral College is not a person or a place, but an assemblage of electors that are chosen by the American people. Despite popular belief, the people of the United States do not directly vote for the President; the people vote for an elector. An elector is a designated person chosen through votes and then they vote for the president. Generally, the electors that are elected share the same political party or vote for the same nominee as the voter (Patterson, 2013). Each state gets at least one elector, however, if states population is considerably bigger than other states, they are given more than on elector.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College ruins the chances of a president being elected due to the amount of Electoral votes. This puts smaller states at a disadvantage due to the lack of campaigning in a certain state. The only states who even receive a slight bit of consideration when presidents run are the ones with the most votes. Such as Texas, California, Florida and New York. These states are key factors which have a huge effect on what candidate will win the Presidential Election.…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Places such as Alaska get only three electoral votes, but states like Californian receives fifty-five. To me, that does not sound like everyone votes counts. Everyone biggest issue about electoral votes deciding who is president is that voters do not feel that that their vote doesn’t count or their voice is not heard. By demolishing the entire Electoral College voting system, I believe that will inspire people to feel as if they are heard. In the book The Electoral College: An Analysis, the author, Robert T. Miller states one of the biggest benefits to eliminated the electoral college voting system by stating that “Every vote would carry the same weight in the election, no matter where in the nation it was cast.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Electoral College Faulty

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages

    George C. Edwards develops the argument about how the Electoral College, with a faulty system detrimental to democracy, should be replaced with direct election. The Electoral College fails in protecting American citizens and candidates. It does not protect minorities or third parties. Many times the votes of the minorities do not affect the…

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This system reduces the chances to the win the presidency for the third party or independent candidates are extremely low. As an example, “A third party or independent candidate were to win the support of even as many as 25% of the voters nationwide, he might still end up with no Electoral College votes at all unless he won a plurality of votes in at least one State” (The Pro 's and Con 's of the Electoral College System). This system limit the presidential election to a two party system which is considered as a good point of the electoral system. In fact if we look closely, this limits the people’s choice among the running candidates. The U.S, citizens are made to look at the candidates which only belongs to the two specific parties.…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus, under the Electoral College, the people of the U.S. do not directly vote for their president. The Electoral college is counterproductive to democracy as it has, on multiple, occasions, produced a result that does not reflect the will of the people. To begin with, Article II of the U.S. Constitution outlines the Executive Branch which includes the president, vice president, and the Electoral College. As previously stated, the number of electors for each…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A candidate can win the popular vote but still not win the election, because that candidate has more votes from the Electoral College. Some believe that the larger states have too much power. When you have too many electoral votes, the voice of the individual decreases, therefore, leaving little influence in the presidential election. This amount of power makes the voting unequal. Another criticism is the Winner Takes All process.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many Americans are requesting that the Electoral College be abolished due to inconsistencies, for example: The Electoral College votes are not equally dispersed for each state, or someone could become President by winning only 21.8% of the popular vote, and the swing states vs the safe states which can favor one candidate over the…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each state is able to pick their electors, but do not have the final vote to elect a president. The chosen electors are then the ones who choose the president for us. Choosing electors for the Electoral College does vary from state to state. If the United State wanted to get rid of the Electoral vote it would most likely require a constitutional amendment. It would be a difficult goal to achieve as it would require approval by 2/3 majorities of both houses of Congress and also by the legislatures in 3/4 of the states.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays