Electoral College Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
A few years after the United States was founded, the Constitutional Convention met to decide how the nation would be governed. They decided that they needed a leader to govern the nation. Based on experiences, the delegates knew that they needed find someone who was not a tyrant and did not abuse their power. The delegates did not believe that the president should be chosen by popular vote. They did not contemplate that voters would be perspicacious enough to make a worthy choice in choosing the president. Therefore, they came up with the Electoral College. In this system, the president is chosen indirectly. Each state gets a number of electoral votes based on how numerous the numbers of the members are in the House of Representatives are, …show more content…
The Electoral College does not provide a straightforward process to elect president. As specified in Document D, “It favors some citizens over others depending solely upon the state which voters cast their votes for president…” In view of the fact that a state has less people than another does not necessitate that, they should obtain extra electoral votes. It should be fair and just let the votes be based off the number of senators and representatives. With political equality, all citizens are equal and it allows citizens to participate in state affairs. It includes the right to vote and the right to challenge elections. Represented in Document D, the District of Columbia combined with twelve other states have less people than Illinois, but have other electoral votes. That’s unfair. Illinois should have an accurate representation of their votes and be subpar compared to the other states and D.C just since one might be bigger or smaller than the other might be. As stated in Document G, the House of Representatives elected John Quincy Adams in 1824. John Quincy Adams did not even win the popular vote or the electoral vote. Andrew Jackson did. However, he did not have the majority. As a result, John Quincy Adams won thanks to the …show more content…
The Electoral College should be abolished because: smaller states are over represented, it is undemocratic, and it violates political equality. The Electoral College should be archaic. Essentially, there happens to be no need for it. It was established on basis of that people did not know what or who they were voting for and voted just because they could. Now-a-days, people transpire to be further educated and are able to establish the right decision on who the president should be. America exists as a democracy and all about equality. If states are more significant than others, then the candidates are only are required to attempt to win the states that take the electoral votes. It remains one-sided for the rest of the country. If a candidate has won 30 states and the other candidate won 20 how is that fair and an accurate way of taking the people 's

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Vote

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The straight vote method is when the popular vote by the people is directly impacting the nomination for President rather than going through the Electoral College. As stated, the votes from the American people also known as the popular vote, does not directly affect the presidential running and so, when it came to the 2000 election, the winning candidate was a surprise. According to Patterson (2013), Bush lost in the popular vote in the 2000 election, however, he was elected president. This situation occurred due to the Electoral College. Background information on the Electoral College is that state is given a set amount of electors and they are based upon the votes.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens make up the state, so if you do not have citizens you would not have states. Then if we were to get rid of the Electoral College; then the candidates would pay attention to other states more than they do now. They are more worried about the winner take all system that they ignore the state they already know their vote for them. Which disenfranchises voter who supported the losing candidates. This system favors some citizens over others, which denies some people their choice of president.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Instead, the government is focusing on power for the states when that should be inconsequential. The concentration of votes within a certain state should not matter because it is the total vote of the people nationally that should determine who will be president. Which state the votes come from does not matter. On the other hand, voting is one of the most important individual rights given to the people. Voting is ranked alongside the Bill of Rights.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since results are based on the number of electoral votes and not the number of popular votes, presidential candidates can still win the election even if the nation voted for the other candidate. If the popular votes counted instead of the electoral ones, the candidate we wanted would win, not the one that won because he had the votes of larger states. Problems with representation are also caused by the differing number of votes that states receive because of population. Noble said that there is one electoral vote in California for every 705,454 people. While in Wyoming, there’s one electoral vote for every 194,717 people.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Technically, the president is not chosen directly by people, but instead is chosen by electors through a process called the Electoral College. The idea came from the Constitution because the founders thought it would be a compromise to elect a president based on popular vote among citizens, and electing the president in Congress. The number of electors a state has is determined by how many members of Congress from both the House of Representatives and the Senate that each state has within the state. There are a total of five hundred and thirty-eight electors in all fifty states, but you need two hundred and seventy to win. After you cast your ballot for President, your vote goes to the state to be totaled up with everyone else’s votes in your state.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Electoral College Faulty

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Yet, the founders did not build the United States to become a Democracy. (http://www.thisnation.com/question/011.html )Therefore, his view of every person having a direct vote to the president is invalid. The Electoral College is a large reminder of this difference. This institutionally, is not different from our method of electing representatives or senators. We elect representatives to vote for us on laws and issues as we vote, in essence, or our electoral representatives.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each state is able to pick their electors, but do not have the final vote to elect a president. The chosen electors are then the ones who choose the president for us. Choosing electors for the Electoral College does vary from state to state. If the United State wanted to get rid of the Electoral vote it would most likely require a constitutional amendment. It would be a difficult goal to achieve as it would require approval by 2/3 majorities of both houses of Congress and also by the legislatures in 3/4 of the states.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the general presidential election, the votes of the people are not influential in any way. The electoral college has been in place since our government was created and it has does its job electing the president relatively well; so well some people do not know the system exists. But, it is time for our government to evolve like everything else in the world has. With the advantages in technology, American citizens have the resources to know all about the candidates who are running, unlike in the past. To create a better democracy and for the people of America to truly feel that they have an influential part in the government, the electoral college needs to be done away…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pro Electoral College

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The country has been driven to choose between far left and far right candidates with no chance of choosing a president who is in the middle of the political spectrum. The members of these two parties know this and would be hostile to a change in the electing system. There is no need to abolish the Electoral College completely; it only needs revision. Instead of grouping the electors of each state together in a “winner take all” situation, assign each electoral vote to equally sized districts of a state. Each voting district should have the same population in order to keep it congruent with the popular vote.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    citizens vote on who they would like to be president. Despite the fact that their votes are not the deciding factor. The Electoral College is a system set where “Each state is awarded as many delegates as it has members of the House and Senate” combined (text, p. 63). This totals to be 538 votes total which results in 270 votes needed for a candidate to win the election. The Electoral College was meant to combine participation of citizens, legislatures, and the state.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays