Electoral College Vs Popular Vote Essay

Improved Essays
The Electoral College is in place to decide the president of the United States. There are people that agree on it and people that do not. The Electoral College System is an inadequate form of electing the president of the United States, there are better ways to go about choosing a president in a more Democratic way. Having a popular vote, or by deciding by congressional districts would be other options that Congress has thought about, and even states have signed in on being for a National Popular Vote. The Electoral College is a representation of the popular vote, on the other hand it makes it unfair at the same time. A National Popular Vote would be more Democratic than the Electoral College system because more people would be inclined to go out and vote because they would know that their …show more content…
These states go either way or it is hard to project where they are leaning, left or right. According to Kyle Kondik of politico, he says “Seven states start as the only obvious toss-ups on our first 2016 Electoral Map”. Those are the states that a candidate visits the most for them to try to win that state. Most of the time they spend most of their time in those states, why should they go to a safe state of any party? It’s a waste of time. With a popular election, yes they would go to the battleground states but it would force them to reach more of the American people for them to dominate a state to receive as many votes as they can from that state, and more people would come out and vote from a state. Having only the candidate go to a few states does not really get people to go out and vote for them. If someone wants to become the president of the United States, then they represent all of Americans. If the candidate only go to the few states that they call battleground states, then it seems the other states are irrelevant. The electoral system makes only a few states irrelevant and not the rest of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Citizens make up the state, so if you do not have citizens you would not have states. Then if we were to get rid of the Electoral College; then the candidates would pay attention to other states more than they do now. They are more worried about the winner take all system that they ignore the state they already know their vote for them. Which disenfranchises voter who supported the losing candidates. This system favors some citizens over others, which denies some people their choice of president.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We cannot just elect the president due to popular vote. This is because there is too much politics involved. States with a smaller population have more political power than in a direct election system. Since most of the low population states are Republican, electing a president by popular vote would drastically decrease the chances of the president being Republican. If we wanted to get rid of the Electoral College it would require a constitutional amendment.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a possibility that more citizens would use their right to vote if they know for certain that their vote matters and makes an impact. If people know that the president becomes elected based off of the popular vote rather than only a small elite number of people, then they may want to go out and vote so that the person they view as most qualified will be elected into office. Therefore, I believe that the electoral college should not exist because it provides an opportunity for presidents to be elected who did not receive the overall majority from the popular vote. This means that in a democratic society, the nominee who the people want to be their representative may lose due to the number of electoral college…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However the counterargument is that the Electoral College and the first pass the Post System that allow for true representation from each state in the election. This is because each state has a different winner that was chosen by the people of that state or at least the plurality of the people in that state. So it comes down to the Electoral College the true question is does the plurality system allow for better representation? Or does it dilute the votes of the general population? In this instance the plurality system is better than say a full blown majority rules when it comes representing the views of each state independently from the population.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Negative Effects of the Winner-Take-All Method In the current US election system, citizens do not directly vote for their next president. Instead, a group called the Electoral College carries out that function. Citizens cast their votes and those votes are tallied up by state. Once tallied, the Electors, also known as Representatives, of the states place their votes. Each state has a certain amount of electoral votes.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My second reason is that it doesn’t match up with the popular votes that were taken by the people. This two reasons alone are more than enough to show this system needs to be fixed. My first reason is that representation is NOT equal; our founding fathers wanted everyone to be considered equal. Furthermore, its unequal in a way that most people would not expect, the smaller states have a larger say in who gets to be our president. One example of this would be the election data from 2010 comparing the states of Montana VS Illinois.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Candidates don’t visit every town of the battleground states and the citizens don’t have the opportunity to meet and ask all the questions they want to them. But this might also result from according to State University, a lack of votes. As they worded it “Presidential candidates might ignore states with small populations if not for the electoral college. Under the current system, candidates campaign in whichever states the election results are expected to be closest. Under a national popular vote, critics say, candidates would focus their attention on capturing areas with the most people and the most votes” (stateuniversity.com).…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sources from Procon.org said, “If the election depended solely on the popular vote, then candidates could limit campaigning to heavily-populated areas or specific regions (Procon.org).” The candidates would not have to do as much campaigning because they would only be focused on the battleground states. Even though if the U.S only had the popular vote, all states would become battleground states because there would be no pledged delegates to put the final state vote in. The election process needs to be changed, there are several fixes that could be implemented into Congress to fix the electoral system in the United States. The Electoral College takes the power away from the citizens that they should have in a modern democracy, like voting directly for presidential candidates most importantly. According to Jerry Fresia, "None of our rights have been handed down; they have all been won through resistance.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Unfair

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This means that the representative chosen to vote in the electoral college must represent the popular vote or the values that the state holds. Most of the time this is what happens, but sometimes, like with Al Gore & Bush, they can lose the electoral college because the representative voted differently to the state vote. Unfortunately, this seems unfair but sometimes it could be for the better. Truth is, there are many people who go out and vote for someone or something that they are completely uneducated about. Per say, someone could go out and vote for someone without knowing how that candidate feels about certain education issues, gun control reforms, foreign policy issues etc.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Every citizen’s vote should count in America, not just the votes of the partisan insiders in the Electoral College. The Electoral College was necessary when communications were poor, literacy was low, and voters lacked information about out-of-state figures, which is clearly no longer the case.” This quote by Representative Gene Green reveals the faults in our current presidential voting system and the need for it to change. It has been an example and a basis to newly formed democracies all over the world, but the election to choose our nation’s leader isn’t as fair as it seems. While every citizen’s voice is heard in the public polls, ultimately it’s the Electors’ votes that select the new president. Therefore, I believe that our election…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays