Medical Case Study: Rhonda Ryder

Superior Essays
In this paper I will explain that the God Squad’s central value, when determining who should receive the limited resource, was the value to society provided by the candidate. Due to this criteria, Rhonda Ryder would not be put on the list because her societal value included prostitution charges, case of syphilis, drug use, and multiple children with different fathers. However, I deem that the God Squad’s system is flawed insofar as it fails to consider how the resource could be used most effectively. I will also argue that the important value should be the prosperity of the organ and patient in order to ensure the organ is not wasted: killing two people. Therefore, I contend that Rhonda Ryder should be put on the list. There is good evidence that she will survive long term due to her youth, otherwise healthy, no other disease, and compliancy with her health care.
The God Squad was a committee of seven anonymous members who were given the difficult task of choosing which candidates with end-stage renal disease should receive dialysis, a life-saving procedure. Additionally, a medical team evaluated all of the possible candidates to ensure they were all medically adequate for dialysis prior to reaching the God
…show more content…
Rhonda Ryder is single woman with two young children from two different fathers. Furthermore, she does not show any prospect of having a job and was arrested two years ago for prostitution. Additionally, she was diagnosed with a virulent strain of syphilis that went untreated, which most likely resulted in kidney damage. For this reason, Rhonda Ryder would not show any evidence of “future potential” in the values of the God Squad. The God Squad centered their decisions around the candidate’s societal status and due to Rhonda Ryder’s status: income, net worth, occupation, references, etc. she would not be considered for a kidney

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Prison Organ Donors Essay

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Prisoners as Organ Donors Each day, in the United States, 123,956 people are waiting for an organ donor. According to Becoming a Donor, 18 of those people die each day waiting for an organ donor that is not found in time. 1 donor can save 8 lives and change many more (organdonor.gov). There is great controversy on whether or not inmates should be allowed to be organ donors. My goal with this essay is to make everyone aware of the number of people who await an organ transplant and how allowing inmates to donate could relieve some of this burden.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organ Harvesting Summary

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The author defines several definitions in progression in this narrative from the brain death, “beating-heart cadaver” and organ donor. The main point for me is, that if we make an early decision to be a donor, the death actually can be transformed to something extraordinary and gives live. “To be able, as a dead person, to make a gift of this magnitude is phenomenal.” (27) Roach appeals everyone to consider saving lives not only no loves ones, but to a stranger.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sally Satel makes the argument that there is no such thing as indignity when receiving financial gain for the donation of an organ, and she is correct by saying such. Satel believes that in order to increase the amount of transplants that occur worldwide, there much be some sort of incentive to the donors. The types of incentives should not be regulated by the government though, because the life of an individual that needs an organ is not the business of the national government. Satel opens her argument by describing the two different methods that governments want to take to sole the organ donor and transplant crisis that is occurring in the world today. The first solutions she says that governments want to use is making organ trafficking…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organ Sales Legalized Rhetorical Analysis for "Organ Sales Will Save Lives" It does not make sense for people to die unnecessarily if there is a way to easily save their lives. Author of "Organ Sales Will Save Lives", Joanna Mackay seems to agree. In her essay, she argues that the government should regulate organ sales, rather than ban them. In "Organ Sales Will Save Lives" Mackay uses facts and statistics to reveal shocking numbers to the audience, revealing how lengthy the waitlist for an organ can be. Mackay touches on how many patients have passed away annually due to end-stage renal disease, bringing to light the importance of this issue.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people would claim that authorizing the sale of organs will take advantage of the poorer people in the third world countries, but that’s already happening. The organ seller does usually collect most of the money promised, but it doesn’t make a dent on their financial struggles. The threat of a $50,000 fine and five years in prison (Finkel 26), the up-to-date ban is not successful in averting illegal organ sales and operations. The underprivileged families don’t need more harsh and rigorous punishments, on the contrary they need just the opposite. If organ sales were made lawful, it could be controlled and supervised by the government.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joanna Mackay’s essay, Organ Sales Will Save Lives speaks for itself. It is what the world has been going through for more than two decades up to this point. The shortage within the supply of organs, in this case, Kidneys. Kidneys are at a high demand not just domestically but internationally and that is where the problem began to get uncontrollable. In the year 2000, 2,583 Americans died while waiting for a Kidney transplant.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paper 4 "Organ Sales Will Save Lives" by Joanna MacKay explains the problem that thousands of people are complaining about. This problem is that thousands of people are begging to buy a kidney, but the government doesn't allow people to sell human organs. This outcome causes thousands of people to die each year, creating chaos around the world. Mackay and the other author’s want to convey their message to the government on why this catastrophic problem should be fixed. Since this essay is written on the subject of organ sales and Mackay’s essay was written back in 2004 some information may be dated, however not much has changed to fix this issue.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I will then examine what is meant by the needs of the living, and the wishes of the dead, and compare the two. Next, I will examine an argument for organ conscription, and analyse its flaws. I will finish with an argument against organ conscription, and examine why an idea that may seem theoretically good, would not work in the real world. When considering an argument about organ conscription after death, one must first define death.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organ Sales Will Save Lives In the essay “Organ Sales Will Save Lives” by Joanna Mackay, kidney failure is the main topic. In the thesis Mackay says “Government should not ban the sale of the human organs, they should regulate it.” It is supported by the evidence it will save lives. 350,000 people in America struggle with this situation each year.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, Maura Dickey persuades parents of a savior child that live organ harvesting is wrong because the child should be able to choose. This article is stating that live organ harvesting is wrong and the savior child is not treated fair. The author explains why this is wrong “until the child can provide informed consent or make a conscious decision about what to do with her body parts”(2). The child should be able to consent. This is important because they have a right to choose what to do with their body and nobody for take advantage of children .…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anita: I, would have to agree with you Anita the Cleveland website was far more attentive to the personal needs of its readers. Even though the Mayo clinic did provide information that the patient could access, the website was not very user friendly and personal. It is my opinion, that the Mayo clinic was set up to be more factual and to the point. Maybe, its website had been set up quite a few years ago, and patient user friendliness was not part of the marketing website setup. Today, user friendliness is the key to business success.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    We are being inhumane to force people to continue suffering in this way (Newman, 1996). Choosing for a more painless death comes a lot easier for patients along with family who witness the pain of their loved is enduring with all the medications and treatments (which tend to cause severe side effects). I believe that is justified. Especially knowing that the chances of survival are very slim for the patient. Supports of the mercy killing ask whether it is rational or not to keep a terminally ill patient who’s hopes of survival are slim and alive on a support system when our medical infrastructure is under immense pressure (Naik, 2011).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second reason to change the method of execution in the United States is finances. Cases without the death penalty cost approximately $740,000, while cases with the death penalty cost over than $1.2 million- it is almost $500,000 difference. To maintain a death row prisoner to live in prison costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in general population. At this moment, in 2016 there are 714 inmates on California 's death row (“Costs of the Death Penalty”). Also the death penalty is also growing more expensive with each passing year.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2. How would you change the current policies to ensure the most appropriate candidate receives a donated organ? I feel that, the policies are understandable, however with the staggering number of deaths per day do, I feel something more significant could be done to decrease the number of individuals who do not receive the medical support. Although this is an immense issue, it is extremely difficult to meet the demand of necessary organs, I feel that more recourses should be given on research to develop alternate options for organs donations.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, saving multiple people with the organs of one person is the most ethical decision, since we save the most possible amount of people. He would argue that since we can use about twenty-five organs for transplant from each person that we would kill to save people, it is right to do. By extrapolation, eventually restoring twenty-five people to full health will outweigh the consequences of killing one person, despite what that one person’s life is worth overall. Most would agree that two hundred and fifty lives are more valuable than ten lives, despite whoever those ten are. This is not necessarily to say that each of those lives are equal in value; however it is very hard to argue against the fact that it is mathematically likely for two hundred and fifty people to have a greater impact on the earth than ten people, even if those ten people’s lives are worth more individually than the lives of the two hundred and…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays