The Kalam Argument
Introduction:
In the Kalam Argument, there are some theories that can be used by Christian apologetics to challenge the theories and beliefs of non-believers. The strong points of the Kalam Argument can make good arguments that can be challenging to non-believers. Although there are some good points in the Kalam Argument, there are also a few weaknesses concerning creation and evolutional changes. In the viewpoints contained in the Kalam Argument, even the weak points can be used by Christian apologetics to provide a solid challenge that could possibly have both an intellectual and emotional effect on an atheist. The Kalam Argument has its strengths and some weaknesses, but can still be effective enough to create a logical …show more content…
Another weak side to The Kalam Argument, according to some atheists, would be that they do not believe that God made the universe at all, nevertheless, interfered with how it works (Smith, 2015). Some non-believers have the strong belief that if God is the creator of the cosmos, then, He would have made everything flawless and in perfect order all at once (Smith, 2015). The beginning and end theory in The Kalam Argument concerning the evolutional process in time, from beginning to end, or the Big Bang Theory, only proves God’s mistakes as a creator in the views of some atheists (Smith, 2015). A non-believer would probably argue about just calling any universal change just a part of the natural evolutionary process other than the works of the Divine Creator (Smith, …show more content…
In the Kalam Argument, are theories that contain credible strong viewpoints. Even Though the Kalam Argument has its good arguments about how the universe was made and how things progress, it also has some frailties. The Kalam Argument, regardless of its lack of strength in some areas, can produce a valid argument against a non-believer on an intelligent level that can even give the nonbeliever different feelings about the Kalam Argument.
Introduction:
In the Kalam Argument, there are some theories that can be used by Christian apologetics to challenge the theories and beliefs of non-believers. The strong points of the Kalam Argument can make good arguments that can be challenging to non-believers. Although there are some good points in the Kalam Argument, there are also a few weaknesses concerning creation and evolutional changes. In the viewpoints contained in the Kalam Argument, even the weak points can be used by Christian apologetics to provide a solid challenge that could possibly have both an intellectual and emotional effect on an atheist. The Kalam Argument has its strengths and some weaknesses, but can still be effective enough to create a logical …show more content…
Another weak side to The Kalam Argument, according to some atheists, would be that they do not believe that God made the universe at all, nevertheless, interfered with how it works (Smith, 2015). Some non-believers have the strong belief that if God is the creator of the cosmos, then, He would have made everything flawless and in perfect order all at once (Smith, 2015). The beginning and end theory in The Kalam Argument concerning the evolutional process in time, from beginning to end, or the Big Bang Theory, only proves God’s mistakes as a creator in the views of some atheists (Smith, 2015). A non-believer would probably argue about just calling any universal change just a part of the natural evolutionary process other than the works of the Divine Creator (Smith, …show more content…
In the Kalam Argument, are theories that contain credible strong viewpoints. Even Though the Kalam Argument has its good arguments about how the universe was made and how things progress, it also has some frailties. The Kalam Argument, regardless of its lack of strength in some areas, can produce a valid argument against a non-believer on an intelligent level that can even give the nonbeliever different feelings about the Kalam Argument.