Religious Teachings Argument Essay

Improved Essays
To start, this dilemma of looking to religious teachings as a moral guide is important because many people look to a god to guide them morally, while others do not believe in any god. However, religion is still a large part of philosophy. The strongest argument in favor of this view is, as stated by Shafer-Landau, the Divine Command Theory, which holds that “acts are right just because God commands them” (Shafer-Landau 2). In standard form, the argument would look like this:
P1: Acts commanded by God are morally right, and those not commanded are morally wrong.
P2: God’s commands are in the Bible and other religious texts/teachings.
C: Therefore, religious teachings are an infallible guide to how to act morally.
God is the entity that created
…show more content…
P3: Those who do not believe in a god do not believe that God can guide our morals.
C: Therefore, religious teachings are not an infallible source.
This would mean that religious teachings are not an infallible guide, because to be “infallible” means to be incapable of error. Due to there being multiple ways to interpret religious teachings that would mean that they are not free of error.
To reexamine the argument in favor, I would say that it is a valid argument, because if the premises are true then the conclusion would also logically be true. However, premise one is not completely true, due to the fact that there are people who do not believe in God. Agnostics and atheists would not hold true that acts are morally right if God commands them. The objection to the existence of God is a major reason why the Divine Command Theory is not able to fully support the argument. If God is not real, then He could not have created or interpreted morals. A response that might be given to this is that agnostics and atheists simply need to be converted, not only to “save” their souls, but also to make them morally upstanding people. However, based upon personal experience, one does not need to believe in any god to act morally, and therefore does not need to be converted to a religion that has yet to be classified as myth (along with so many

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    My own view on faith is that it is not a strong enough argument for proof of Gods existence. I agree with Dawkins that to believe something to be true there must be some kind of real evidence. I believe that most people would agree that evidence should be required to prove God exists but many people would argue there is no evidence against God’s…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many scholars and believers, like St. Thomas Aquinas, refused the Divine Command Theory for this reason but still believe in God and His instructions. They still believe in God because they are able, and willing, to associate their ethics with religion from a different perspective (Rachels p. 56). In conclusion, the Divine Command Theory is very important in Philosophy and Ethics. Even though the different parts of it contribute to its difficulty to fully comprehend, it is a necessary topic to study. It is also important to learn about the Euthypro Problem that accompanies the theory because, without the problem, the person would not know why the theory leads to the conclusion that morality is not associated with the will of God.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality And Religion

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, how can we know what is right? Those who claim that morality is dependent on religion argue that without religion people would not know what is moral. In other words, religion is the reason why people know what is right and what is wrong. That is, without a religious source, humans could not figure out the nature of morality by themselves. However, this view is problematic.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mavrodes’ disagrees with Bertrand Russell’s secular views on religion, as he emphasizes his lack of religion and disagreance with the idea of God. Russell claims that morality does not need religion in order to work because they don’t go hand in hand. George Mavrodes rejects Russsell’s ideas and says his views cannot “answer the question ‘Why should I be moral?’ because the common goods are often just those that we sacrifice in carrying out our moral obligations” (Mavrodes, 194). Mavrodes’ doesn’t think secular ethics is a good comparison to whether or not religion and morality go together. He makes a point that secularists have no right to comment on the relationship because their input is biased and “deep” in their eyes is “matter and energy, or perhaps natural law, chance or chaos” (Mavrodes, 194).…

    • 1113 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This thesis goes on to say that moral rightness means that it is willed by God and moral wrongness means being against the will of God. I don’t generally agree with this thesis because I believe that if God did not exist people would still know what is right and wrong. This is where we run into some problems with the Divine Command Theory. The first problem is that if God is the…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rationalism In Religion

    • 2796 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This does not seem like it would work, however they take from the “strong rationalists” the idea that there should be some evidence to help support what it is they believe, but that this does not go so far as to be 100 percent proof in their belief system. The “critical rationalist” take the opposite of “fideism” and say that it should be rational to argue and search religious beliefs. Is it rational to keep believing in a religious faith even when your peers are looking at the same evidence and finding a different answer? This can be rational when you are a “critical rationalist.” People around the world do not, or cannot have the time and or intelligence to fully understand and grapple…

    • 2796 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He bases it off of the idea that there is nothing superior to God or there is nothing superior to the Truth in which God is Truth. But we have no way of nothing what is superior to something else. We might look at something and think we are superior to it while if we saw the situation from it’s side we would see that it is superior to us it is just not showing that it is making us think we are superior. So, we have no way of knowing what is superior to something else. It also runs into the same problem with the good and bad argument that there is not universal superiority that we know of.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A person could be the most religious, but still lack moral values. As for non religious people, they could have no belief in God whatsoever, but have the most respected moral values. Because of this, religion should not be intertwined with morals. All in all, morality and religion should be looked at as two different ideas, and should not be related in any way. The most basic views of the differences between morality and religion is natural law and divine law.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Divine Command Theory explains that actions are good if and only if God commands them, and actions are bad if and only if God forbids them. This makes the Divine Command Theory independent of human thought and feeling, it is God who determines what actions are moral. If we were to disobey God that would be an immoral thing to do and thus, we would be punished. We are motivated to follow this theory because it is the only reason why we still follow moral laws. If we were to believe that God did not exist, then there would be no reason for people to do the right thing.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Something that can approve or disapprove of actions by command is more powerful than something that cannot. Therefore, if God cannot approve or disapprove of actions by will then he is not the most powerful being imaginable, since we can think of something that can, but this is ridiculous if you believe in God. So, God has the power to make things right or wrong by…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics