Robert Merrithew Addams: A Modified Divine Command Theory Of Ethical Wrongness

Improved Essays
The article written by Robert Merrithew Addams, A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness, expresses a unique view of the Divine Command Theory in which Addams has modified to answer certain controversial issues. The main controversy being towards the theory’s implications of ethical wrongness and the different situations it can be applied. In Plato’s, Euthyphro, the controversy can be seen through the statement, “… nor the pious the same as the god-loved,” (70). This argument presents questions of what applies towards someone’s beliefs in God. Furthermore, the original theory, according to Addams, implies a connection between “wrong,” and “contrary towards God’s commands,” (39). Addams presents an issue with this connection, with the reasoning that if God were to command cruelty for its own sake then it would be against God’s will to disobey Him (?). Thus, Addams has created a modified version of the overall theory where it is stated that it is neither wrong nor right to disobey God, especially if they were to command …show more content…
Maybe he did fear that there might have been flaw if he did in fact answered the question himself. For Addams’s sake, his theory is applicable only if God lacks human virtues that do not directly categorize God as good. The downside is that if human virtues prove to actually categorize God as good then the Modified Divine Command Theory would no longer be needed. All of this assumes that God has a set of commands in which could be influenced by the human virtues God contains. Nevertheless, the Modified Divine Command Theory provides a good alternative to the highly controversial original Divine Command Theory. Readers get a chance to decide which one they choose to believe, which Addams does a good job proposing his own theory. Modified or not the choice of what you believe is completely up to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Pious Analysis

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pious and Impious Within the Book of Euthyphro discusses of the subjects that justify or do not justify everyday morality and tribulations. Ultimately, the holiness of that which judges people and their actions including Euthyphro’s. There are, however, possible contradictions that Euthyphro has within the perception or definition of morality, holiness, or crime. Perceptions whether it is of people or gods often times do not incorporate other insights into their belief system or actions.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that Plato’s Euthyphro shows that though it is possible for religion and morality to connect, they are two separate concepts independent of each other and must always be considered as such. Throughout the dialogue, Socrates demonstrates that the foundations of morality cannot be based on religion, as this provides a definition of morality that is ultimately empty. Throughout the dialogue of Euthyphro, Socrates attempts to use irony and thorough questioning to refute Euthyphro’s arguments and reveal the errors in his definition of piety, or morality. When asked what piety is, Euthyphro simply replies that “the pious is to do what I am doing now” (Plato 6).…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When it comes to the notions of the law in Sophocles’ Antigone, most of us will readily agree that there were many contrasting beliefs among the characters. However, where this agreement usually ends is on the question of whether the law of the divine or the law of man is superior. The many instances in which the law of the divine and the law of man clash in Sophocles’ Antigone, and the many instances in which the laws of the gods are disobeyed in Homer’s the Odyssey suggest that the law of the divine always prevails above all else. To begin with, in Sophocles’ Antigone, religion and the state are not necessarily in alignment and are often contradicting each other.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Republic, Plato believes people should base their morals on the god 's behavior. After proving that gods are not bad, Plato specifically states, “. . . a god is good, he is not––as most people claim–– the cause of everything that happens to human beings of only a few things, good things. . .” (379c). Plato’s idea of basing one’s morals on the behavior of gods is not revolutionary, but a rather common thought.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Adams God Claim

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Beginning his essay, Robert Adams brings a specific claim regarding God’s nature to the attention of the reader. This claim, made by many theologians and philosophers, is as follows, “If a perfectly good moral agent created any world at all, it would have to be the very best world that he could create.” While Adams states for us that there are many who hold to this claim regarding the Creator, he is quick to let the reader know that he is not one such person. Arguing that these claims are false, Adams attempts to show that it is consistent with a Judeo-Christian understanding of ethics that God need not create the best of all possible worlds. It is in defense of this main that Adams gives readers scenarios that serve to illustrate his belief that an all-good, all-powerful God must not necessarily create a world that would be completely flawless and exemplary.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mackie Free Will

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From the moment man stepped foot on the porous soil of earth, an inner-voice began to awaken from within the confines of cerebral tissue; a compelling force that enables man to chose between both what is right, and that which is not. Is it a higher power, or the complex mechanics of evolution that is to blame for the establishment of this subconscious observer? Did the creative force bestowing mankind with such a powerful tool know the extent to which it would be used? As impossible as these questions appear to answer, it is evident that this concealed power is a seemingly inherent motivating influence in human decision-making. For the sake of argument and the purpose of this paper, this intuitive metaphysical force will be regarded as free-will,…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Protagoras, a Greek thinker and teacher, while commenting about his affliction to human reasoning and logic, quipped, “Man is the measure of all things.” (Jowett, 1871, p. 17) Just as Protagoras held this philosophy, and the reliance of man to act as man, it is unlikely he could have ever known how Socrates, some many years later, would prove him right. This affirmation was best evidenced by the philosophical argument held between Socrates and Euthyphro regarding man’s moral obligations, and holiness.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Struggling with god's law and man's law has always been a recurring issue throughout mankind. In the play Antigone by Sophocles man’s and god's laws also reappears throughout the story. The two types of laws are very different, god’s law depends on faith and man's law can be set by a democracy or a monarchy. Whether one believes in god’s law or man’s these laws keep civil order and peace, but that does not mean that these laws cannot create moral conflict every now and then. In the play Antigone written by Sophocles, the author demonstrates Kohlberg’s moral hierarchy scale by using man’s law, god’s law and the characters in the story.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people have justifications for why they do certain things. Some justifications are based off of happiness, desires, god or morals. People who use happiness and desires as their justification use theories of the good. While those who use god and morals use theories of morality. Some theories that fall into the theories of morality are the divine command theory, consequentialism, and social contract theory.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the divine command theory, an act is morally good because the gods say that it is morally good; however, there are problems with this theory. The first problem being, the divine command theory does not argue that morality must depend upon religion. Then, there is the possibility of a command changing such as God commanding that murder is alright on Mondays, then commanding that murder is not alright on Monday. On the contrary to the divine command theory, there is the debate between Socrates and Euthyphro, Euthyphro states the opposite: an act is morally good solely because of its goodness and that is why the gods love it.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato's Euthyphro, Socrates introduces a problem to Euthyphro asking whether “the pious [is] being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by gods” (Plato 12). One can better understand this concept by relating the Euthyphro Dilemma to the Divine Command Theory and examining the potential philosophical implications associated with the two while indicating their errors. The Divine Command Theory states that morality is “somehow dependent upon God” and that it “consists in obedience to God’s commands”. The Divine Command Theory also says that it’s basis is that it is “ultimately based on the commands or character of God” (Austin).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Divine Command Theory

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    James Rachels 's critique of the Divine Command Theory in "The Elements of Moral Theory" rests on three points. Rachels 's first point is that the idea of God "making" something right is a mysterious and therefore not useful assertion. Another point raised by Rachels is the problem that God could easily have given us different commands, making the existing ones arbitrary. If God is the source of the reasons for what is right, then if God had commanded "Thou shalt kill", then killing would be the morally right thing to do instead of refraining from it - a clearly morally repugnant assertion. The final point raised is the simple fact that God 's will is not the basis of people 's reasoning in determining what is right and wrong.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This paper will talk about a theory known as Divine Command and the problem that hampers it which is known as the Euthypro Problem. To start off the paper, I will explain what the Divine Command Theory is and the main idea behind it. Next, I will talk about why this theory is so enticing to many people. After, I will reveal the problem with the theory called the Euthypro Problem, why it is titled Euthypro, and why it causes a problem within the theory. Later in the paper, I will discuss how the first part of the theory makes morality trivial and how it makes the concept of God always being good unimportant.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Divine Command Theory explains that actions are good if and only if God commands them, and actions are bad if and only if God forbids them. This makes the Divine Command Theory independent of human thought and feeling, it is God who determines what actions are moral. If we were to disobey God that would be an immoral thing to do and thus, we would be punished. We are motivated to follow this theory because it is the only reason why we still follow moral laws.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics