Plato's Euthyphro Dilemma To The Divine Command Theory

Improved Essays
In Plato's Euthyphro, Socrates introduces a problem to Euthyphro asking whether “the pious [is] being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by gods” (Plato 12). One can better understand this concept by relating the Euthyphro Dilemma to the Divine Command Theory and examining the potential philosophical implications associated with the two while indicating their errors.
The Divine Command Theory states that morality is “somehow dependent upon God” and that it “consists in obedience to God’s commands”. The Divine Command Theory also says that it’s basis is that it is “ultimately based on the commands or character of God” (Austin). In other words, the morally correct decision is that which a deity, or group of deities, concludes is correct.
For the sake of these arguments, the Christian God, who is omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omnipresent, will represent the deity that Socrates speaks about. God's
…show more content…
There are many opponents of the Divine Command Theory but very few have plausible arguments. Bertrand Russell argues that if piety is because of God’s authorization, then to God “there is no difference between right and wrong” and because of this, Russell says it cannot be said that God is good (Russell 12). He also says that in order to say that God is good, one must agree that morality and immorality have meaning separate from God’s authorization because “God's fiats are good and not good independently of the mere fact that he made them” (12). One valid point Russell brings up is that to assume God is good would mean that He is unable to command anything that is evil. This argument allows that God can haphazardly change whether an action is moral or not. However, because of God’s omnipotence and omnibenevolence, He does have the power to acknowledge rape as moral but will not because of his nature of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Pious Analysis

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This leads on a sea of contradictories at a larger scale of judgment and often times becomes skew of what equal judgment can be of one another. Euthyphro’s definition of what is pious may be clear on the surface, however it is of a contradictory concept because of subjective views on what is pious either from others or the gods.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates in Apology In the Apology, Socrates presents an argument for his belief in the Greek gods to invalidate Meletus’ assertion that Socrates is an atheist, which therefore means his teachings corrupt the youth (26b). Socrates’ argument is valid through philosophical logic yet as we will find, his argument is not sound. There are also revisions to Meletus’ claims which will be presented as it will display a stronger argument in favor of Socrates’ atheism.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Socrates attempted to demonstrate to Euthyphro, if one simply considers everything that God commands to be good, goodness loses its meaning. An idea of morality that is separate from religion shows that what God commands can be a part of what is moral, however, morality also reaches past these…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Western philosophy began in the 6th century BCE in ancient Greece. These first philosophers that we know of are called “Pre-Socratics”, meaning they came before Socrates. Socrates’ philosophical prowess, however, brought forth a time that freedom of self-consciousness was first challenged. In my opinion, Socrates was the first philosopher to distinguish the value of philosophy even though they were just mere thoughts of men. In Bertrand Russell’s “The Value of Philosophy”, he addresses the very nature of philosophy itself.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article written by Robert Merrithew Addams, A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness, expresses a unique view of the Divine Command Theory in which Addams has modified to answer certain controversial issues. The main controversy being towards the theory’s implications of ethical wrongness and the different situations it can be applied. In Plato’s, Euthyphro, the controversy can be seen through the statement, “… nor the pious the same as the god-loved,” (70). This argument presents questions of what applies towards someone’s beliefs in God. Furthermore, the original theory, according to Addams, implies a connection between “wrong,” and “contrary towards God’s commands,” (39).…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Murphy states that if there are problems in the world, the public will turn to political leaders for help. When those leaders require assistance they turn to the philosophers to aid in making moral decisions. After reading Plato’s Apology, and Euthyphro we are left with the question of what role should a philosophical attitude play in a life that is intelligently lived. The answer is that it is a key component, according to Plato and Murphy, in understanding how everything comes together proving how a philosophical attitude directly relates to an intelligent and morally lived life. Even though these three life styles are directly related I feel as though some explaining of them is necessary to understand why they are such an important role in our lives.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth and Fifth of Euthyphro's Definitions to Piety In the fourth definition of Euthyphro in Plato's dialogue of “Euthyphro”, he describes piety is as a “servants show to their master” (Plato 71). meaning the one should follow the god's ways, like in a way in how a priest would follow the words of the gods in what could be good or evil. Furthermore, Euthyphro could be suggesting that attending to gods is piety (good), meaning doing things that would please the gods would be seeing as goods or just. While not attending to the gods would be seen as impiety to the gods, meaning doing things that the gods would not like would seeing as an evil deed.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    how little does the common herd know of the nature of right and truth. A man must be an extraordinary man and have made great strides in wisdom, before he could have seen his way to this” (p. 3). This quote from Socrates comes after he asks Euthyphro what he is doing on the porch of King Archon. Euthyphro responds by telling Socrates that he is there to bring up a charge of murder against his father. When Socrates points out that, according to accepted beliefs, it is wicked to harm or bring disgrace on one’s father, Euthyphro counters that that makes no difference.…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As such, it is held that moral obligation to divine law, and to man, cannot coexist. This paper will address the concept of holiness and its resonance throughout Plato’s dialogue, and why holiness takes a prominent position in the conversation between Socrates and Euthyphro. Three definitions, used by Euthyphro in his argument with Socrates and how Socrates refutes them will be discussed, to include what is believed to be Socrates’ goal throughout the…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With the divine command theory, it makes someone justify an extremely horrific act by claiming God authorized us to do so. This is explained by the divine perfection argument, which is against the divine command theory. If the divine command theory is true, then a morally perfect God could have created a flawless morality that required us to rape little children. But a morally perfect God could not have issued such commands, anyone who did would be morally imperfect. Therefore, the divine command theory is…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Throughout the ages, people have formed theories of approaching metaethics. People desire to have a method of understanding what is moral and why it is moral. Ultimately, the Divine Nature Theory is the most reasonable approach to metaethics when compared to other approaches, and according to the practical application of this theory’s approach to metaethics, premarital sex is immoral. The Divine Nature Theory Ethic…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Divine Command Theory

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    James Rachels 's critique of the Divine Command Theory in "The Elements of Moral Theory" rests on three points. Rachels 's first point is that the idea of God "making" something right is a mysterious and therefore not useful assertion. Another point raised by Rachels is the problem that God could easily have given us different commands, making the existing ones arbitrary. If God is the source of the reasons for what is right, then if God had commanded "Thou shalt kill", then killing would be the morally right thing to do instead of refraining from it - a clearly morally repugnant assertion. The final point raised is the simple fact that God 's will is not the basis of people 's reasoning in determining what is right and wrong.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This paper will talk about a theory known as Divine Command and the problem that hampers it which is known as the Euthypro Problem. To start off the paper, I will explain what the Divine Command Theory is and the main idea behind it. Next, I will talk about why this theory is so enticing to many people. After, I will reveal the problem with the theory called the Euthypro Problem, why it is titled Euthypro, and why it causes a problem within the theory. Later in the paper, I will discuss how the first part of the theory makes morality trivial and how it makes the concept of God always being good unimportant.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that, moral goodness and badness are a part of the axiological concepts while deontological concepts are more about moral obligation and duty. Also, he says that deontological concepts depend on God’s commands, while axiological concepts depend on God himself. (Lowder). Alston, just like Aquinas, is convinced that the Euthyphro dilemma is false and is a defender of the Divine Command Theory. He argues that because God is morally perfect he would never command any immoral or unjust actions (Koons).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays