Shafer-Landeau's Divine Command Theory

Improved Essays
The Divine Command Theory explains that actions are good if and only if God commands them, and actions are bad if and only if God forbids them. This makes the Divine Command Theory independent of human thought and feeling, it is God who determines what actions are moral. If we were to disobey God that would be an immoral thing to do and thus, we would be punished.
We are motivated to follow this theory because it is the only reason why we still follow moral laws. If we were to believe that God did not exist, then there would be no reason for people to do the right thing. “Without the belief in God, people are more likely to stray from the path of virtue. It will be harder for them to sacrifice self-interest when duty calls” (Shafer-Landau
…show more content…
During the dialogue between Euthyphro and Socrates, a very important question is brought to light. Socrates asked, “Does God command us to do actions because they are morally right, or are actions morally right because God commands them?” (Shafer-Landau 67) There are numerous ways that philosophers have answered this question. Normally this question is divided into the subjective horn which is the first half of the question and the objective horn the rest of the question. In the subjective horn, goodness is believed to be objective because God can choose a wrong action to be good or bad, a good action to be bad or good. It all depends on his perspective on the matter, it seems as if God is creating morality by the flip of a coin (Shafer-Landau 68). This line of thinking contradicts our motivations to follow the moral laws, no one would follow an arbitrary and imperfect God. This ultimately leads us to believe that God has reasons for making certain actions good or bad, those reasons are what makes those actions good or bad and not God himself (Shafer-Landau 68). In the objective horn, goodness is believed to have existed before God. This contradicts the subjective horn and questions whether we depend on God. I believe that even if goodness was created before God, he is still there to act as our role model and spiritual guide. For instance, when you first hand a car to a teenager, you do not simply give them the keys and pretend like they will know what to do. You have to teach them and show them how to use the car properly. God is our teacher, he teaches us how to use goodness

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The reason for why God commands something is this love and it would be logically impossible for God to command something which would go against his character. Therefore, morality cannot be held as being unstructured. However, this is not a sufficient defence of the theory, as we could respond by saying that if God had loved something else, murder for example; then morality would be different to what we have now. Secondly, Socrates second horn destroys the validity of God being Good (Law, 2015). If something is good because it is the will of God, then God is Good because this is his will.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Divine command theory is the idea that certain actions are morally good or morally bad because they are what God wills for us. God’s demands determine what is right or wrong. What he tells us to do is right, and what he tells us not to do is wrong. This theory states that the only thing that makes an act morally wrong is that God forbids doing it, which implies…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rachels proposes this quote as an objection to DCT, “do the gods command it because it is right?” (51). This quote portrays that God is deducing something to be morally right based on something else, apart from himself. A sophisticated euthyphist would say that because God recognizes something to be right and it is no longer up to him to command actions. The source that God deduced the command from is what determines the action to be morally right or wrong—not God. Philosophical educator Crash Course, stresses that if the rules of morality are taken from something other than God, then why can others not just find that source and figure out morality for themselves (Crash Course).…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case, we cannot define this action as an evil that God creates or necessarily warrants. However, evil exists because humans have free will to choose cruelty over good. However, Mackie responds, “why could He not have made men such that they always freely choose the good?” [1;334]. Mill proposes that perhaps, God just didn’t know how. And for the same reasons, this is why God couldn’t make humans to live longer or not wear down.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, it addresses the problem that is usually faced in ethics because it gets rid of the personal emotions in ethics and makes it objective. There is no subjectivity in it because whatever God allows is good and whatever He doesn’t want us to do is bad. Also, because God is going to judge us at the end of our lives, it is important to still live morally well and not just worry about only you. In other words, any actions that negatively affect other humans will be attributed to you and you may not be looked highly upon by God (Rachels p.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This thesis goes on to say that moral rightness means that it is willed by God and moral wrongness means being against the will of God. I don’t generally agree with this thesis because I believe that if God did not exist people would still know what is right and wrong. This is where we run into some problems with the Divine Command Theory. The first problem is that if God is the…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William L. Craig also agrees that a person can be morally good without the belief in God, however, he states that the debate is about the goodness without God. He argued that Kurtz showed the absence of God in order to show that nihilism is not true. But in Craig’s statement he argued for theism, which is when moral values are bounded by God. He made a statement that if theism were to be true, then we have a sound foundation for morality, and if it is not true, we do not have a sound foundation for morality. Craig started off with theism was true.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, the original theory, according to Addams, implies a connection between “wrong,” and “contrary towards God’s commands,” (39). Addams presents an issue with this connection, with the reasoning that if God were to command cruelty for its own sake then it would be against God’s will to disobey Him (?). Thus, Addams has created a modified version of the overall theory where it is stated that it is neither wrong nor right to disobey God, especially if they were to command…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many theists claim that morality does not in fact reach farther than God’s commandments. Proponents of the Divine Command Theory maintain that morality is based solely on religion, and that everything God commands is good simply because God commanded it. However, if everything God says becomes automatically morally good, the meaning of the word “moral” is lost. Therefore, this theory “makes right and wrong subject to God’s whims, which makes it impossible for God to be non-trivially good” (Lecture 9/28). Without a separation between morality and God’s commandments, there would be no way to know the true nature of morality.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Of course, Humes only feel religious beliefs can be rational if they have concrete evidence to support. Humes doesn’t question whether God exists or not, but if we as people can come up with a conclusion on Gods nature and being. In respondence to what Aquinas states and his five reason, I believe Humes wouldn’t completely agree with Aquinas. I say this because Humes is all about being rational. If there isn’t enough evidence in the world, he believes that there may not be a way to find out if God a powerful, wise and perfect.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics