Shafer-Landeau's Divine Command Theory

Improved Essays
The Divine Command Theory explains that actions are good if and only if God commands them, and actions are bad if and only if God forbids them. This makes the Divine Command Theory independent of human thought and feeling, it is God who determines what actions are moral. If we were to disobey God that would be an immoral thing to do and thus, we would be punished.
We are motivated to follow this theory because it is the only reason why we still follow moral laws. If we were to believe that God did not exist, then there would be no reason for people to do the right thing. “Without the belief in God, people are more likely to stray from the path of virtue. It will be harder for them to sacrifice self-interest when duty calls” (Shafer-Landau
…show more content…
During the dialogue between Euthyphro and Socrates, a very important question is brought to light. Socrates asked, “Does God command us to do actions because they are morally right, or are actions morally right because God commands them?” (Shafer-Landau 67) There are numerous ways that philosophers have answered this question. Normally this question is divided into the subjective horn which is the first half of the question and the objective horn the rest of the question. In the subjective horn, goodness is believed to be objective because God can choose a wrong action to be good or bad, a good action to be bad or good. It all depends on his perspective on the matter, it seems as if God is creating morality by the flip of a coin (Shafer-Landau 68). This line of thinking contradicts our motivations to follow the moral laws, no one would follow an arbitrary and imperfect God. This ultimately leads us to believe that God has reasons for making certain actions good or bad, those reasons are what makes those actions good or bad and not God himself (Shafer-Landau 68). In the objective horn, goodness is believed to have existed before God. This contradicts the subjective horn and questions whether we depend on God. I believe that even if goodness was created before God, he is still there to act as our role model and spiritual guide. For instance, when you first hand a car to a teenager, you do not simply give them the keys and pretend like they will know what to do. You have to teach them and show them how to use the car properly. God is our teacher, he teaches us how to use goodness

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Euthyphro dilemma is started when two questions were presented about the divine command theorists. In the Euthyphro dialogue, Socrates asked if something is right because God commands it, or does God command it because it is right? This created a suggestion about the relationship between morality and religion to be uncertain I think. It seems as if Euthyphro accepts both theories even though as it is being augmented by Socrates to explain further depths of his reasoning. The options offered to the divine command theorist are intended to be logically exhaustive.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In essence, God decides morality, the basis of right and wrong. If God says something is right then it is morally right; if God says something is wrong then it also is morally wrong. However, flaws in this theory have caused many people to deny it and believe in Saint Thomas Aquinas Theory of Natural Law. This theory is divided into three parts: the world has values and views built into its nature, describe not only how things are but also how they ought to be, and how do we determine what is tight and wrong. The two theories are opposite in terms of viewpoint but in today's world, but of them are rejected because of conflicting issues.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Throughout the ages, people have formed theories of approaching metaethics. People desire to have a method of understanding what is moral and why it is moral. Ultimately, the Divine Nature Theory is the most reasonable approach to metaethics when compared to other approaches, and according to the practical application of this theory’s approach to metaethics, premarital sex is immoral. The Divine Nature Theory Ethic…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will argue that Plato’s Euthyphro shows that though it is possible for religion and morality to connect, they are two separate concepts independent of each other and must always be considered as such. Throughout the dialogue, Socrates demonstrates that the foundations of morality cannot be based on religion, as this provides a definition of morality that is ultimately empty. Throughout the dialogue of Euthyphro, Socrates attempts to use irony and thorough questioning to refute Euthyphro’s arguments and reveal the errors in his definition of piety, or morality. When asked what piety is, Euthyphro simply replies that “the pious is to do what I am doing now” (Plato 6).…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article written by Robert Merrithew Addams, A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness, expresses a unique view of the Divine Command Theory in which Addams has modified to answer certain controversial issues. The main controversy being towards the theory’s implications of ethical wrongness and the different situations it can be applied. In Plato’s, Euthyphro, the controversy can be seen through the statement, “… nor the pious the same as the god-loved,” (70). This argument presents questions of what applies towards someone’s beliefs in God. Furthermore, the original theory, according to Addams, implies a connection between “wrong,” and “contrary towards God’s commands,” (39).…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Divine Command theory is explained as “a dependency thesis theory that maintains that morally right acts are simply those that God commands or wills for us to do” (265.) With Love Thy Neighbor being one of the Ten Commandments, if one believes in the Divine Command Theory, they must follow this commandment always. In my opinion, a believer who accepts Divine Command Theory would have no moral obligation to sponsor a child. The Bible states in Mark 12:13 “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' There is not another commandment greater than these.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato's Socratic dialog Euthyphro through its content can be considered representative of the types of philosophical quests Socrates is highly recognized for. In many of the Socratic dialogs, Socrates seeks out those who possess knowledge only to prove that they don’t possess given knowledge. Socrates performs this task by questioning the experts and ultimately driving them to contradict themselves. In the dialog Euthyphro, Socrates receives three different definitions of Piety by Euthyphro. I will be analyzing the different definitions in order justify Socrates’ issue with Euthyphro’s definitions of piety and why a definition of piety is necessary act in a pious manner.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthyphro Pious Analysis

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Plato’s Euthyphro, the main theme and meaning of the nature of pious was discussed between Socrates and Euthyphro. Socrates is trying to help Euthyphro find the reasoning behind what makes something pious and impious. In this comparative analysis, Socrates entices the mind behind the reasons of pious and philosophy.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato's Euthyphro, Socrates introduces a problem to Euthyphro asking whether “the pious [is] being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by gods” (Plato 12). One can better understand this concept by relating the Euthyphro Dilemma to the Divine Command Theory and examining the potential philosophical implications associated with the two while indicating their errors. The Divine Command Theory states that morality is “somehow dependent upon God” and that it “consists in obedience to God’s commands”. The Divine Command Theory also says that it’s basis is that it is “ultimately based on the commands or character of God” (Austin).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Protagoras, a Greek thinker and teacher, while commenting about his affliction to human reasoning and logic, quipped, “Man is the measure of all things.” (Jowett, 1871, p. 17) Just as Protagoras held this philosophy, and the reliance of man to act as man, it is unlikely he could have ever known how Socrates, some many years later, would prove him right. This affirmation was best evidenced by the philosophical argument held between Socrates and Euthyphro regarding man’s moral obligations, and holiness.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With the divine command theory, it makes someone justify an extremely horrific act by claiming God authorized us to do so. This is explained by the divine perfection argument, which is against the divine command theory. If the divine command theory is true, then a morally perfect God could have created a flawless morality that required us to rape little children. But a morally perfect God could not have issued such commands, anyone who did would be morally imperfect. Therefore, the divine command theory is…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why would it be right for him to commit immoral acts and for us not to? This also gives unrighteous justice to people who commit crimes in the name of God. If God gave us morality, religious choices would be clearer. For example, topics like gay marriage and abortion are commonly debated upon.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most persistence questions we as thinking having often tends to challenge the existence of God. That question is, ‘if God is good and made us in His likeness, then why is there evil in the world?’ This question has plagued both theist and philosophers alike. I personally have encountered this very question in both Religious Quest, as well as Philosophy. While the latter concentrates on the logical problem of evil in order to argue that there can not be a perfect God who could then allow evil, the theist believes in an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent God.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This suggests that no action can be held as being morally good unless God commands it. However a major problem with this is that Gods commands are seen to be arbitrary. There is no moral reason for Gods will, as he invents morality. This leaves morality with no rational structure. We can exemplify this with the following example; God commands that one should honour and respect their mother and father, and this is morally right.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many things have changed since man was first made out of the dust of the earth, but the passage of time finds humanity today continuing to struggle with reality (and themselves) just as their predecessors did many years ago. Worldview (that is, one’s perception of reality) is critical to how an individual comes to terms with such things, as it both shapes and is shaped by the person who holds it. Plato, the ancient Greek philosopher, is no exception, but is noteworthy as much of Western thought stems from the contemplations of his enigmatic mind. The worldview held by this philosopher is based upon a moral framework of absolutely defined good and evil, a separation between a true self called “soul” and the physical body (just as archetypes…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics