The Divine Command Theory: Morality Is Ultimately Based On The Commands Of God

Improved Essays
My purpose in this essay is to explain and analyze the Divine Command Theory. Divine Command Theory states that morality is ultimately based on the commands of God. I agree with Divine Command Theory because I believe in God and that he is the creator of all things. Therefore, since he is the most powerful thing imaginable, he has the right to make actions right or wrong by command.
Divine command theory is the idea that certain actions are morally good or morally bad because they are what God wills for us. God’s demands determine what is right or wrong. What he tells us to do is right, and what he tells us not to do is wrong. This theory states that the only thing that makes an act morally wrong is that God forbids doing it, which implies
…show more content…
One is to ground goodness in God’s nature. This answers the question of whether an action is morally good because God commands it because it implies that God does not decide what is right and what is wrong on impulse. It is God’s nature to do good, and God never acts against his nature. God commands and speaks out of his character, not arbitrarily. This then answers the question of whether God commands an action because it is morally good because the foundation of morality is God’s nature and not some external principle to which God must follow. God’s sovereignty is then restored. Another argument for this theory is to try to show that if you believe in God, then you should accept this theory as the best moral theory. God is the most powerful being imaginable. Something that can approve or disapprove of actions by command is more powerful than something that cannot. Therefore, if God cannot approve or disapprove of actions by will then he is not the most powerful being imaginable, since we can think of something that can, but this is ridiculous if you believe in God. So, God has the power to make things right or wrong by …show more content…
I am a child of God, and it is my duty to do what he commands. In faith, I believe that God’s commands are for my own good. He loves us and wants to help us, not give us some unnecessary obligation. As our creator, he has the knowledge to know how we should live our lives, what works best, and what will cause the most happiness. With this belief, I have the hope that I will be able to live a moral life. Divine Command Theory gives us the answer to why we should be moral by holding us accountable for our actions by God. Those who commit evil acts will be punished, and those who live moral lives will be rewarded with eternal life. Given our human nature, some actions and character traits satisfy us, and some do not. For example, lying or committing murder will not help satisfy us as human beings. God created us with a certain nature. He could have created us differently, such as by making us flourish and be satisfied by lying or committing murder, but he did not. Therefore, we must live our lives indicating a love for God and other people if we want to be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The Divine Command Theory

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    James Rachels 's critique of the Divine Command Theory in "The Elements of Moral Theory" rests on three points. Rachels 's first point is that the idea of God "making" something right is a mysterious and therefore not useful assertion. Another point raised by Rachels is the problem that God could easily have given us different commands, making the existing ones arbitrary. If God is the source of the reasons for what is right, then if God had commanded "Thou shalt kill", then killing would be the morally right thing to do instead of refraining from it - a clearly morally repugnant assertion. The final point raised is the simple fact that God 's will is not the basis of people 's reasoning in determining what is right and wrong. For instance, if God definitively didn 't exist, rape wouldn 't immediately be regarded as right. People 's sense of reason would let them see that rape is brutal and ruins lives, and from those points they decide not to…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved. In addition, the Rachels examine The Theory of Natural Law, which stipulates the viewpoint that the world has a rational order, with values and purposes built into its very nature. Another main point is whether there are distinctively religious positions on major moral issues that Christians must accept.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, the Divine Nature Theory is objective. Namely, what God’s nature reveals to be morally correct is absolutely correct for everyone. Therefore, the Divine Nature Theory succeeds where ethical relativism fails. Ethical relativism holds that whatever a person or culture believes to be morally correct is morally correct. Subsequently, if a person or culture deems that murder or slavery is morally correct, ethical relativism holds that the actions are morally correct. Further, if one believes that ethical relativism is morally correct and another believes that it is incorrect,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many theists claim that morality does not in fact reach farther than God’s commandments. Proponents of the Divine Command Theory maintain that morality is based solely on religion, and that everything God commands is good simply because God commanded it. However, if everything God says becomes automatically morally good, the meaning of the word “moral” is lost. Therefore, this theory “makes right and wrong subject to God’s whims, which makes it impossible for God to be non-trivially good” (Lecture 9/28). Without a separation between morality and God’s commandments, there would be no way to know the true nature of morality. As Socrates attempted to demonstrate to Euthyphro, if one simply considers everything that God commands to be good, goodness loses its meaning. An idea of morality that is separate from religion shows that what God commands can be a part of what is moral, however, morality also reaches past these…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article written by Robert Merrithew Addams, A Modified Divine Command Theory of Ethical Wrongness, expresses a unique view of the Divine Command Theory in which Addams has modified to answer certain controversial issues. The main controversy being towards the theory’s implications of ethical wrongness and the different situations it can be applied. In Plato’s, Euthyphro, the controversy can be seen through the statement, “… nor the pious the same as the god-loved,” (70). This argument presents questions of what applies towards someone’s beliefs in God. Furthermore, the original theory, according to Addams, implies a connection between “wrong,” and “contrary towards God’s commands,” (39). Addams presents an issue with this connection, with the reasoning that if God were to command cruelty for its own sake then it would be against God’s will to disobey Him (?). Thus, Addams has created a modified version of the overall theory where it is stated that it is neither wrong nor right to disobey God, especially if they were to command…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics are system of moral principles by which Christian Adherents can practically apply the traditional teachings, which are ultimately unpinned by the beliefs of christianity. Thus, the process of ethical reasoning can be used to affirm the love of god and make active moral decisions within the Christian community. The fundamental sources of Christian ethical teachings reside within Jesus’s commandments of love, Ten Commandments and the Beatitudes. Each of these doctrines create a fundamental framework for the principals of ethics, and further provide an adherent with guidance to follow core beliefs and reflect in every action they take. Bioethics effectively prescribe specific guidance and moral practice in relation to the contemporary issues…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality includes a person’s standard of conduct or daily practice. The Bible tells us to be perfect as our Heavenly Father is perfect, Matthew 5:48. On the other hand Romans 3:23 reminds us that man falls short of the glory of God. While only God is holy and separated from all evil, we as humans are created with a conscience which allows us to distinguish right from wrong. Additionally, we are given a set of commandments to guide us through our decisions. Although we cannot ever attain perfection, Jesus reminds us throughout scripture that as we seek to know God our flesh becomes one with His word. John…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Or does God command something because it is good? The problem with the first answer is that anything could be considered good. The problem with the second response would be that God is not the source of morality, he is just the messenger for some external force. You can break these two horns and create a third horn that states that God’s nature determines morality not his will or judgment. This creates a new dilemma that asks, does God have control over his nature or does he not have control over his nature? By splitting the dilemma, it will fall back into itself.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Divine Command Theory explains that actions are good if and only if God commands them, and actions are bad if and only if God forbids them. This makes the Divine Command Theory independent of human thought and feeling, it is God who determines what actions are moral. If we were to disobey God that would be an immoral thing to do and thus, we would be punished.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are six evaluative principles that are used to evaluate moral theories. They are Consistency, Applicability, Publicity, Internal Support, External Support, and Explanatory Power. I am going to evaluate Divine Command Theory, Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, and Virtue Ethics using these six evaluative principles.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    With the divine command theory, it makes someone justify an extremely horrific act by claiming God authorized us to do so. This is explained by the divine perfection argument, which is against the divine command theory. If the divine command theory is true, then a morally perfect God could have created a flawless morality that required us to rape little children. But a morally perfect God could not have issued such commands, anyone who did would be morally imperfect. Therefore, the divine command theory is…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    upon God” and that it “consists in obedience to God’s commands”. The Divine Command Theory also says that it’s basis is that it is “ultimately based on the commands or character of God” (Austin). In other words, the morally correct decision is that which a deity, or group of deities, concludes is correct.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In conclusion, the Divine Command Theory is very important in Philosophy and Ethics. Even though the different parts of it contribute to its difficulty to fully comprehend, it is a necessary topic to study. It is also important to learn about the Euthypro Problem that accompanies the theory because, without the problem, the person would not know why the theory leads to the conclusion that morality is not associated with the will of God. Lastly, it is vital to know that one can still believe in God even if morality is not handed down by Him, just like what St. Aquinas…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Euthyphro dilemma is an argument that was brought about by a question asked by Socrates during Plato’s Euthyphro. The question is seen to object the Divine Command Theory. Socrates asked, “is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?” or in other words, “Are morally good acts willed by God because they are morally good, or are they morally good because they are willed by God?” (Philosophy of Religion The Origin of the Euthyphro Dilemma). The Divine Command theorist faces problems that will not allow them to be able to answer the Euthyphro dilemma. Either way, out of both the branches that the Divine Command theorist could pick, there are consequences that they cannot…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Divine command theory is a meta - ethical theory which states that an action is obligatory if and only if, it is commanded by God. In this essay, I will examine whether any form of divine command theory is defensible. In defence, I shall begin by looking at the modified theory as proposed by Robert Adams. Secondly, I will attempt to assess objections from Plato, Austin and Wainwright; before proceeding to evaluate whether these objections are successful in demeaning this theory.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays