Two Types Of Ethical Theories

Improved Essays
In ethics, ethical theories involve the basic concept of wrong and right behavior. There are two types of groups of ethical theories. These theories are consequential and nonconsequential. Consequential principles judge ethics on a certain action by the outcome of that action meaning the overall consequence. Consequential Ethics, determine what is ‘morally right’ and ‘morally wrong’ of the action that is occurring and is than determined by the rate of good to bad that a given action would make. Nonconsequential principles focus on the task being done rather than right or wrong. Ethical theories lead to what moral outcomes should be. However, we will see later my belief on which theory is the best way to know right from wrong. …show more content…
255. Another theory is the Virtue Ethical Theory that on the other hand judges a person and has its attention set on the character of the person rather than the details of a single action. It is able to give detail on a person’s character to be a part of what is called ethical thinking, and not about the rules about the act they make themselves or the actions or consequences that happen after. But, the virtue ethical theory does not take into thought if a person can change its moral character. This theory asks “what does this action say about the character?”. The right thing to do then, is what will be able to demonstrate, encourage, and will be able to set the best character traits of an individual. This theory gives us the ability, to ask not only “What should I do?”, but as well as “How should I be?” with every choice or action that we make. Of course most of the time it’s not clear in the answers for what the right thing to do is, but it gives cultural flexibility (an Aristotelian Approach) where other theories cannot. Aristotle’s Nicomachean answer to Virtue ethics is “happiness only possible with wise choices, noble pursuits”. We live in a world where what is right and wrong is hard to know; the virtue ethical theory gives us a system asking larger questions and still provides us practical advice.(Lesson - Ethical Theory - …show more content…
People who are apart of this theory accept all judgment to be able to acquire of God's character or direct commandments. The holy books of each religion contain God's directions or other words steps, which can be used to chose between what are the right and wrong actions. The idea that ethics and religion are connected is extensive to a certain point, it lets us to search religion's role in our community. Yet on the other hand there are several reasons why the divine command theory does not work well by containing weaknesses. One weakness is on the number of religions and the different explanation of their God (or their higher power). How does someone know that their God's commands are the right and should be the ones to follow? For example I wonder God states that we should not commit murder, does that make murder always wrong even if different circumstances, or should we base the choice we make by the context provided for us in which God gave this command? As an individual we cannot take our self out of choosing God's position on ethical problems that happen.(Lesson - Ethical Theory - Ethics and Religion.pptx

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the divine command theory, an act is morally good because the gods say that it is morally good; however, there are problems with this theory. The first problem being, the divine command theory does not argue that morality must depend upon religion. Then, there is the possibility of a command changing such as God commanding that murder is alright on Mondays, then commanding that murder is not alright on Monday. On the contrary to the divine command theory, there is the debate between Socrates and Euthyphro, Euthyphro states the opposite: an act is morally good solely because of its goodness and that is why the gods love it.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moral Development Theory vs. Operant-Utilitarian Theory of Criminality Yengcheecha Thao California State University, Fresno Criminology 100: Criminology 10 December 2017 Introduction Today, there are many criminological theories that analyze and help provide insight into motivations behind most crimes. Two known theories that describe crimes from a psychological point of view are the Moral Development Theory and the Operant-Utilitarian Theory of Criminality. Both theories have contributed in helping others find the motivation behind certain crimes and how an individual developed their way into committing those crimes.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The essay “The Case against Character” written by Kwame Appiah illustrates the reality of people’s ethics, morals and the decisions that they make. Author discusses more in depth the difference between situational ethics and virtue ethics, and how it relates to the way how we live our life today. When it comes to the situational ethics, as Appiah explains the majority of the decisions that we make on a daily bases are influenced not by our feelings of empathy and compassion, but by the wide variety of situations that we find ourselves in, at that specific time. In contrast of that, the virtue ethics are fully controlled by our emotions, the way how we act reflects on the way how we feel about others. Author clearly describes each theory and shows for what they really stand for, without making his own stand.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, the Divine Command Theory claims that an action is right or wrong based on God’s commands. With an abundant number of Gods, the question arises of how a person would understand which God’s command is correct, if there is controversy. An example that is applicable to today’s society is the relationship between a mother, father, and child. Say the child asked the mother to sneak out of the house and she says no,…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    There are six evaluative principles that are used to evaluate moral theories. They are Consistency, Applicability, Publicity, Internal Support, External Support, and Explanatory Power. I am going to evaluate Divine Command Theory, Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, and Virtue Ethics using these six evaluative principles. First is Divine Command Theory (DCT). For Consistency, DCT is consistent because God either commands an act to be either right, wrong, or it is permissible if God has not claimed if it is right or wrong.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    People have long tried to interpret ethics in societies. Who, how, and why ethics was created are common debates among philosophers. In its simplest form, ethics can be described as how a differentiates between right and wrong. Whether that be due to society’s standards or their own, there are many theories to explain this daily-occurring phenomenon. Kantianism, the divine command theory, existentialism, ethical relativism, the virtue theory, and utilitarianism are the more widely known theories to describe how ethics came to be what we know today.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this theory, it denies that the consequences of an action are the only criteria for determining the morality of an action. Under this theory, each situation may have a different scenario or outcome thus resulting in making the moral decision being a case-by-case basis. The rightness is wrongness is based on properties essential to the action, and not on the consequences. The values that one person holds could be so strong but given a different outcome of ones beliefs, it could be changed in order to adjust to the given or different situation at hand. For example, if you are on a plane and crashed on a deserted island and you are the only lone survivor, you may drop you moral belief that it is wrong to eat human flesh in order to survive.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals hold distinct values and often conclude their interpretation of the world is true and right. It is this complex fusion of values and beliefs that lead to ethical dilemmas. Newman and Pollnitz (2005, page 108) describe ethics as what we perceive to be the right course of action, what we…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    With the divine command theory, it makes someone justify an extremely horrific act by claiming God authorized us to do so. This is explained by the divine perfection argument, which is against the divine command theory. If the divine command theory is true, then a morally perfect God could have created a flawless morality that required us to rape little children. But a morally perfect God could not have issued such commands, anyone who did would be morally imperfect. Therefore, the divine command theory is…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue ethics, a theory created by Aristotle used to make moral decisions. His theory solely relied on individualism, not society, culture or religion. His theory was introduced in ancient Greek times. For Aristotle one should be able to do good without mere pleasure or political since it would be superficial. Virtue ethics is more concerned with how one should live.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Back in ancient Greece Aristotle theory of Virtue Ethics begged the question “what sort of person should I be?” (SL, 254) It’s no surprise this question still persists over two thousand years after his death. To this day Aristotelian virtue ethics remains prominent in ethical theories, all this time there have been objections to its theories but there must be something to these ancient ideas. Over the course of this paper I will explain virtue ethics as a whole and present an argument against virtue ethics and why virtue ethics has been able to withstand the opposing ideas.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In class, we have been discussing ethical theories as well as practicing placing these theories to cases. Ethical theories are a set of principles of right conduct and a system of moral values. The field of ethics involves systematizing, defending, and deciding different concepts of right and wrong behavior. In this day, philosophers are known to separate ethical theories into either metaethics, normative ethics, or applied ethics. I’ve chosen to focus on John Stuart Mill and Aristotle’s opposing argumentative theories which help teach me to analyze the cases provided to me.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    How should we think about ethics? In order to answer this ultimate question, we must first understand the crucial concepts of ethics, but before we look into the concepts, it is essential to state the basic definition of ethic because the word “ethics” is the basis of the question. In our society, ethics is commonly defined as the study of morals, which are the standards of right and wrong that show humans what to do. Knowing this, we can continue with the concepts of ethics. First of all, we have to understand how knowledge about ethics is gained.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical science has only begun to become ethical. In early medical studies, scientists and doctors were able to perform, what we would call today, torturous experiments on people without permission or informed consent. Unfortunately without these hideous experiments or controversial studies, we would not have been able to cure or treat people with a deadly disease. The movie, Lorenzo’s Oil, displays the four ethical theories and highlights some of the ethical principles while lacking others. This movie shows that successful science does not always play by the rules.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    4. DEONTOLOGY Deontology is duty based ethics that places value on the intentions of the individual and focuses on obligations, rules and duties. Adherence to this obligations and rules is regarded as ethically right. TYPES OF DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS Different types of deontological ethical theories are: • Duty theories: an action is considered morally right if it is in accordance with some list of duties and obligations • Contractarianism: an action is considered morally right if it in accordance with the rules that rational moral agents would agree to observe when entering into a social relationship for mutual benefit. This is also known as contractualism.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays