Disinterested Contemplation Analysis

According to Prof. Hoffman, the beauty of molecules has been just not about the traditional concept of simplicity, symmetry, or complexity of its appearance, moreover, the standard of molecular aesthetics are the novelty, the surprise it created, and the utility of the molecular structure. However, the judgment of molecular aesthetic is more than a cognitive rather than spatial. With these few words, the idea of beauty or aesthetic in science, specifically chemistry, far more different than the traditional judgment in art.
What is the traditional judgment in art? In Painting, architecture, sculpture, and etc. to be considered beautiful, it must showcase the basic standard of art. Where art is measured by its unity, simplicity, symmetry, or complexity. It doesn't mean that all this standard must appear on one piece of art. To cite the work of the famous artist, Vincent van Gogh, “the Starry night”, it showcases the unity …show more content…
In which, you rest aside, what is the utility of the subject and focus its technicality. Give more attention to the way it is made, on what the artist used or his medium, on how the artist expresses himself or herself or his style. This thinking might be more visible in the community of art, especially the art critics. In contrary, the field of science relies on utility or functions. All fields of sciences relies heavily on utility. As Hoffman's mentioned, scientist considered beauty due to its utility. Even the theoretical chemist like Professor Hoffman, chemist try to provide an explanation and use of the different element in our society. Moreover, the rules of disinterested contemplation have some conflict in the realm of science. The scientist must see the whole picture in order to devise a law, theory, or even a hypothesis. Albeit, these might seem intangible to the senses, the chemist provides this information to be utilized in cognitive faculties— imagination and