The Issue Of Meat Eating

Improved Essays
What does it mean to eat ethically? That’s what I was wondering, while I was trying to pick a question to write about. While I did research, I found out “means you strive to make educated decisions about your food choices and the impact such choices have on our community, animals, and our environment, and then you strive to reach the best conclusion for YOU” According to this blogger named Caitlin. I’m not a vegan, and I eat meat however, I don’t eat red meat I eat white meat and also I care how my meat is treated before it was slaughter. Sometimes I don’t eat meat at all. I debate with myself all the time, asking myself, is using animals for food is good or bad? That’s when my religion comes to help me make the right choose from an Islamic …show more content…
As I was reading I found myself agreeing more and more with Steiner’s “ Not Only for food, but as beasts of burden, as raw materials, and as sources of captive entertainment—which is the way animals are used in zoos, circuses, and the like” (Steiner’s, 198). I believe if you’re not going to use the animals for food, than you don’t have the right to use the animal to please yourself or others. In Islam, we don’t treat animals cruelly, or over-working them or neglecting animals, or hunting for sports, or cut their mane or tails, or use them for fighting sports or factory farming. Animals have the right to roam around freely, not to be healed somewhere for the good of humans. As I was reading Singer’s auricle, I came across an interesting question, “Animals eat each other, so why shouldn’t we eat them?” In Islam, Muslims are not allowed to eat animals that eat other animals, that’s forbidden. Because Islam forbidden anything that harms the human body. Pork for example, pork is forbidding because Pigs have NO neck that makes it difficult to be slaughtered the Islamic way by the insert of a knife in the neck and therefore getting purged of the blood, which holds a plenty of uric acid, a toxic chemical material that can be harmful to human health. Another question I asked myself, if I was vegan and I believe hurting other animals is wrong. What about plant? They are living things. Like what Kingsolver’s said “the moral rules of destroying our fellow biota (living things, both animals and plants) get even more tangled, the deeper we go. If we draw the okay-to-kill line between “animal” and “plant,” and thus exclude meat, fowl, and fish from our diet on moral grounds, we still must live with the fact that every sack of flour and every soybean-based block of tofu came from a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is personal choice that matters, if these choices are made steadily. I agree with the assertion of the author of “Eating animals”. While some people believes that the world is full of many other problems and this issue is not significant enough to be the first on the “Main problems of the mankind” Agenda, I believe the thinking of adopting (even partly) the not consuming factory farmed meat lifestyle is…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author informs the population how many Americans become ill each year from their food using, a fact. He says, “At least seventy six million Americans to become ill from their food annually” (3). So many cases of illness because of animals being injected with medicine not needed. This is logos because he uses a fact to support his argument. Emotions are used to show the audience how many segments are traced to factory farms.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meat Eating Meat Analysis

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Market Meat: Ignorance and Morality Student ID: 0258094 In this squib I will criticize Norcross’ response to objection 1 to Norcross’ main argument from the essay “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” by Alastair Norcross. In objection 1 to Norcross’s main argument it is argued that Fred tortures the puppies himself, but meat eaters do not torture the farm animals. Norcross’ response is that, Fred’s hiring someone else to torture the puppies for him would be just as wrong. Norcross believes there is not a separation between one who tortures the animals themselves to obtain meat or in this case the fictional chemical “cocoamone” (Norcross, pg. 230).…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The ethical theory I’ve selected to support my position on opposing eating dog meat is Psychological Egoism, presented in Chapter 7 of our textbook. Here’s Shafer-Landau, speaking on Psychological Egoism: “If we have the power to do as we liked, we would always seek out our own best interests, no matter the harms we caused” (Shafer-Landau, 89) Here’s how this quote is linked to my position in oppose eating dog meat. Let’s say we have a Vietnamese friend name Tim, who was born and grew in a poor countryside. He got marriage with his long-time girlfriend and they had four children.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What I think it means to american is that we are diverse and different than any other countries. This idea and its examples are the symbols of freedom that thousands of Americans, not just soldiers but citizens too, have fought for years to preserve and prefect. Unlike other countries, this country is made up of immigrants. Everyone’s ancestors worked hard to get to this country – whether boat or plane. Many of them started with nothing and worked their way up in society because they could.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humans are omnivores, which means that they eat both plants and animals. Ultimately, the human can decide whether or not they are going to consume animal meat. I am analyzing the article “Against Meat” in the They Say I say collection of articles. Jonathan Safran Foer talks about his experiences with his struggles of becoming a vegetarian.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sacrificing Animals for Humans Gary Steiner, a Philosopher, author and Professor at Bucknell University, wrote an article November 2009, in the New York Times entitled, “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable.” In the article, Steiner discusses how unethical he considers it to kill animals for human consumption. In addition to consuming animals, Steiner reports, it’s inhumane to use any products that were made from sacrificing animal lives. The article goes on to say, recently more and more people have become interested in where their meat originated from and how the animals were treated before they were killed. At the same time, others are concerned about whether the animals were fed harmful additives that would affect the health of customers who ate the animals.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rachels, Davis, and Vegetarianism James Rachels decided to become a vegetarian after being convinced by Peter Singer that there needs to be a shift in the way we treat animals. Rachels’ argument for vegetarianism is not an ethical argument, nor an appeal to rights, and although it is utilitarian, it is not based solely on utilitarianism (p. 260-261). He states that it instead “appeals to a simple principle that every decent person already accepts, regardless of his or her stand on other issues” (p. 261). This principle is that, “it is wrong to cause pain unless there is a good enough reason,” an idea that was originally put forth by Singer (p. 260). Rachels specifies that “justification is required,” because sometimes it is not always wrong to cause pain (p. 260).…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meat Eating Vs Veganism

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite biased opinions by vegans, would it surprise someone that meat-eating is essential for optimal health? Recently, much controversy has risen surrounding the battle of vegans and meat-eaters. There are statistics standing on both ends of this debate. Following this is one of the biggest questions about the effect they have on the human body.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While most Americans don't realize it, the consumption of meat inspires a wasteful misuse of the earth's valuable resources, leaving an irreparable scar on the earth and squandering sources of food that could be used to feed the hungry. 20 billion livestock occupy the earth, three times the number of human beings (Motavalli): in the U.S. alone livestock outnumber people 25 to one. The amount of room required to raise all these animals is massive (Corliss). In South America, about 70 thousand acres of rainforest are destroyed every day to make land for cattle to graze (Hurley 40), and the use of the land is so inefficient that it is estimated that a single vegetarian will save an acre of trees every year. In addition, the large number of animals bred for food produce excrement at a rate of 87,000 pounds per second, or about 20 tons of manure per year for every U.S. household, all of which is eventually routed to rivers and streams.…

    • 5059 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this were to be practiced then it would be acceptable and justified to eat animal meat. But, as long as humans continue to mistreat animals before killing or experimenting on them, utilitarian’s will not condone this. Utilitarian’s require humans to treat the animals like human’s and if they fail to do this then we should not use them to experiment on or to kill and eat. This is a positive aspect to the theory because we take animals for granted. Some animals are our companions, or they simply bring us happiness in different ways.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Red Meat

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the history, red meats was accused as the most “unhealthy food” due to it contains a lot of fat inside and it is food from an animal’s body. It had always been blamed for causing all kinds of heart attacks, obesities and cancers. There are all kinds of researches that were done by universities and health departments to say red meats are bad. People believe that all the bad issues that happens to your body is because of red meat but is that true? On the other side, there are also scientist that are releasing researches about red meat actually has a lot of iron and rich in vitamins.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The chances of earth’s environment declining will only increase if humanity continues its meat eating habits, due to the global effects that raising livestock cause to the climate. It has recently been made known to the public on a larger scale, that one of the greatest factors to the ozone layer being damaged is from raising livestock. It is up to us to fix this issue before it makes the world an unlivable place. We have to do this now instead of later. Recently, a group of environmentalists wanted to help save the planet, so they did as much research as they could to find the real issues.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Piper asserts that a vegan diet leads to the death of many animals than that of a non-vegan. He claimed that tractors kill animals such as mice, moles, rabbits and other rodents or have their habitats destroyed (par. 3). According to Piper vegans should consider the reducing their plant 's consumption and “eat more cow” that graze on pasture (par, 4). Animals that produce meat produce more calories and proteins per head than plants making them environmentally friendly contrary to what vegans claimed that they are harmful to the environment. Animals require pasture that is part of biodiversity and by growing pasture; human beings are taking care of the…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part II Dalit History with reference to Beef In the article “beef eating as the root cause of untouchability” Dr. B. R. Ambedkar has explained and linked beef eating practices with Untouchability in Indian society. He gave an account of Census Commissioner of 1910 who have issued a circular to divide the population of India into various categories. In that circular he have mentioned 10 test to differentiate Hindu and non Hindus on the basis of their lifestyle practices. In that test the 10 test is stated “Eat beef and do no reverence to the cow”…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics