Meatless Monday By Jonathan Safran Foer Analysis

Improved Essays
1) The purpose of “Meatless Monday” is to raise awareness of the detrimental environmental impact of eating meat, preserve precious natural resources and to encourage people to help slow climate change: “If being the number one contributor to the most serious threat facing the planet (global warming) isn't enough, what is?”. I would say that the idea if the Meatless Monday is great and I would definitely participate. Each person can decide what is the reason for him to participate – the described by Jonathan Foer contemporary conventional factory farming conditions and animal’s suffering or the fact that it causes unintended health consequences and encompasses also environmental problems. “Not responding is a response - we are equally responsible for what we don't do.” …show more content…
Taking part in “Meatless Monday” means a little responding to the problems that our world has faced.
2)
By “Polarizing” is meant that mostly the decision to eat or not to at factory farmed meat, the meat that comprises 99 % of the meat available in the US’s supermarkets nowadays refers to ethic, to morality and sequentially is a controversial one.
By “personal” side of his assertion Jonathan Foer meant that each individual have the right to decide by his own, being aware of conditions, animal’s suffering and consequences, whether to consume factory farmed meat or not. It is personal choice that matters, if these choices are made steadily.
I agree with the assertion of the author of “Eating animals”. While some people believes that the world is full of many other problems and this issue is not significant enough to be the first on the “Main problems of the mankind” Agenda, I believe the thinking of adopting (even partly) the not consuming factory farmed meat lifestyle is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Veganism Vs Vegetarianism

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People in today’s world live in a place full of wonderful ideas that benefit society like freedom, democracy, and equal rights. Amongst these ideas lurk hidden dangerous ideals that blend in with the uplifting elements of the modern world. One of these hidden poisons is vegetarianism and veganism. They seem to be helping out the environment and saving animals but all they are really doing is harming others and influencing others to harm themselves the same way. Vegetarianism and veganism are wrong because meat is necessary for a human’s diet, it is costly and unethical to distribute vegetarian meals, and animals are on the earth for the benefit of humans and it is more than okay to eat them.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    On Eating Animals Analysis

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While considering the ethical aspects of eating meat, I personally find myself imagining the human as part of a natural circle of life where animals kill and eat each other to survive. Genuine disgust at the cruelty has been evident in the response of donations to animal welfare groups. So it's not to say that farm animals get no sympathy in the United States, but only that Americans somehow don't recognize that cruelty is the norm, not the exception, and is incorporated into the very idea of factory farms; what makes meat cheap is the assembly line processing. Treating animals humanely begins with natural diets, open spaces for living, eliminating the use of hormones that manipulate body weight and mutilations, together with more in depth training for caretakers and inspectors, maybe surveillance cameras, and professionals who enforce laws and prosecute violators, and so on all of which would make meat more expensive. Nothing strikes me as more absurd than calling oneself an animal lover while consuming industrialized meat, though people will surely continue to lie to themselves and even offer various excuses to defend their habit.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Lab-Grown Meat Analysis

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The author took the mythical and futuristic truth of his perception in details as depicted in the article. Though a large part of his introduction shows his disappointment on the topic that seems to be an honest view. The article talks widely about the negatives impacts that will be brought about by lab-meat. Besides, it talks about how much effort scientists have put in place or rather invested to ensure that they realize this long term goal. The researchers hope and believe that this endeavor when realized will help the lives of animals that are slaughtered to supply the meat…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This article maintains that factory farms are necessary to meet the growing demand of feeding the population, and that these farms are humane. While I agree that at our current level of meat consumption, that factory farms are necessary to keep up with the demand, I refute that argument by pointing out that eliminating meat from our diets would decrease that demand. Additionally, there is overwhelming evidence that these farms are not humane. This is made evident by the fact that the general public is not permitted to see inside of these operations. Additionally, the fact that 85% of the meat is controlled by four companies illustrates that there is a national dilemma that would be influenced by consumers refusing to buy these factory-farmed meat…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vitamin b12 is sure prove that we need meat in our diets. B12 is absolutely important and necessary for survival. Besides synthetic b12 didn 't exist until the 20th century and who know what side effects that carries. If our ancestors were vegetarian we would not be here today because we would have all died from anemia due to vitamin b12 deficiency. Ethically is eating meat bad?…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book Eating Animals is a journalistic book written by Jonathan Safran Foer. In the book Foer talks about good and bad consequences of eating animals in America. He talks about animal welfare in family vs. factory farms, animal diseases, slaughter and much more. Foer does not a directly attempt to convince the reader to become vegan, however his main idea does focus on many problems of the meat industry being solved by people becoming vegan. But is this solution realistic?…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Not only does this farming inflict inhumane violence and fear upon the animals within the system, but contributes significantly to health issues among humans and the warming of our climate. Foer engages in the idea that a lot of social bonds that are created between humans are made of the sharing of a meal, much of the time that includes meat. Foers call to action includes a change in culture, and not just to stop eating factory farmed meats, but to stop eating meat in general. He questions the readers, “Given that eating animals is absolutely no way necessary for my family- unlike some in the world, we have easy access to a wide variety of other foods- should we eat animals?”(Foer, 196) Even though Paul Willis’s farm may be humane and the ideal farming method, Foer remarks that eating any kind of meat, even raised from Paul’s farm, supports the demand for meat, ultimately supporting factory farming. Throughout the text, Foer provides no investigation of why humans eat meat or what the reasons are of whys it’s such an evolutionary trend.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    PHIL 4300: Philosophy of Food Dr. Kaplan November 15, 2015 Zack Viator To Eat Meat, or Not to Eat Meat.. LOL In this paper, I will demonstrate the best arguments (in my opinion) both for and against the consumption of meat. I will conclude with my thoughts on meat consumption and why I think the best stance is a middle ground between eating meat how society currently does and not eating meat such as a vegetarian does. Arguments AGAINST eating meat: a. Cruelty- The ethical argument against eating animals is obvious. How can we cause harm to another sentient being? Livestock is raised with the intention of killing for food, at least eventually.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Different cultures around the world consume different things, some are cannibals, some eat cats, some eat pigs, some eat horses, and others do not eat meat at all. Some of these things you may be okay with but others you may not. Our moral opposition tends to steer our decisions to the culture we appeal to. While we do not want animals to suffer, we tend to detach from that when the subject focuses on food. Whatever meat we consume, we end up taking the life of an animal and thus end the respect we had for life.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Name Course Professor’s Name Date Analysis and Evaluation of Eating Animal The author of the book, Eating Animal, Jonathan Safran Foer focuses on a very important issue of the contemporary world that is food. Eating habits, food culture, farming, and food manufacturing are very closely related. Consumers most of the time ignore where food comes from. They eat food because it is a basic need that they need for survival. However, the author of the book digs deeper into the process of how and where food especially meat comes ready for human consumption.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays