The Importance Of Animal Rights

Improved Essays
Humans, animals, plants and all kinds of creatures live in this planet relevant to each other in an established order. To maintain the order and to keep the planet habitable we are responsible for our actions against other creatures. This leads to the point that we have some moral obligations towards animals. To clarify, we as humans can not cause unnecessary pain that even Edwin Locke who is against animal rights agrees upon (Edwin Locke, 1). However, these moral obligations do not include meat eating which many of animal rightists strongly disagree on but indeed include not to have animal agriculture under very cruel conditions. There is a common sense in terms of dissenting gratuitous suffering towards animals among animal rightists as …show more content…
There are so many animal lovers around the world and they adopt cats, dogs, fish, birds and other kinds of animals to keep and look after in their houses. Of course they don’t adopt animals in order to harm them or to cause any pain but the important point here is that they restrict animals’ freedom by doing this. Whether it is good or bad for animals it is certain that it is against their rights as well as not suitable for their natural creation and environment. Besides there is no reasonable cause to adopt animals and keep them in small places which is against their natural way of living. Animal lovers tend to oppose any kinds of use of animals but they do not consider domestication as gratuitous which is not …show more content…
It is absolutely against our moral obligations towards animals and cannot be justified in any circumstances. I refer to animal agriculture which is being done in major cities with huge number of animals. They are being farmed in facilities which are certainly not sanitized. Big corporations stack animals in small places and even mutilate them in order to speed up the process of factory farming. While these are certainly inappropriate some animal rightists and vegetarians claim eating meat is not moral and it is included among unnecessary actions. Prof. Gary L. Francione is against animal agriculture and the use of animals in medical research. Francione states that to eat meat or animal products is indeed unnecessary and cannot be justified in any sense (Gary Francione,2). Well his statement regarding eating meat is not required and being unnecessary for humans is not correct. There are several evidences and arguments against this position regarding meat eating.
There is a certain fact that all animals have digestive system that related to their eating habits. An herbivore animal cannot digest meat if it is not omnivorous. People who claim we do not need meat for our diet is basically wrong on that point because we do have a digestive system that allows us to eat meat. Also with the fact that no parts of any human or animal body is useless, it is clear that we are created

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is personal choice that matters, if these choices are made steadily. I agree with the assertion of the author of “Eating animals”. While some people believes that the world is full of many other problems and this issue is not significant enough to be the first on the “Main problems of the mankind” Agenda, I believe the thinking of adopting (even partly) the not consuming factory farmed meat lifestyle is…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Salami Tell You About Steiner “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable” is an op-ed guest column published in the New York Times in 2009, written by Gary Steiner. Steiner is a philosophy professor at Bucknell University who has published other animal rights books including Anthropocentrism and Its Discontents and Animals and the Moral Community. He attempts to open the minds of the readers to learn about their “normal” behavior. Things such as eating meat, going to zoos, or even enjoying circuses are what Steiner wants people to reconsider for their own behavior. Steiner states, “We should reevaluate the ideas we have inherited from Western philosophy that human animals are morally superior to non-humans” (“Gary Steiner”).…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pollan's Argument

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Argument for Eating Animals Here, I present an argument for the conclusion that it is morally permissible to eat humanely farmed meat. Michael Pollan presents the argument that “sometimes eating animals is…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The appearance of various right movements resulted in giving full specter of rights to millions of people and erased cultural confusion and tensions existed earlier. But the animal right movement faced us with another sort of cultural confusion. Some animal right activists believe that animals should be given more rights as creatures which can’t protect themselves. The arguments which the author brought to our attention were about how to treat the animals.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In fact, the widespread belief that farming conditions should change or that humans should avoid meat would negatively impact the economy. In the article, “Is there a moral case for meat?”, Nathanael Johnson splits his essay into two parts. In the first part of the article, Johnson tries to find a logical counter…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I have always believed that eating meat can be okay, until i realized the bad consequences. I agree that eating meat is ethical, if is peppered properly because my experience becoming a vegetarian, and knowing the raising process confirms it. “Is there an ethical distinction between the deaths caused by a yeoman farmer who grimly butchers a hog in the fall and a minimum-wage factory worker who mechanically butchers six thousand in a morning?” (Schwennesen 179).…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vitamin b12 is sure prove that we need meat in our diets. B12 is absolutely important and necessary for survival. Besides synthetic b12 didn 't exist until the 20th century and who know what side effects that carries. If our ancestors were vegetarian we would not be here today because we would have all died from anemia due to vitamin b12 deficiency. Ethically is eating meat bad?…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that meat is a very wasteful use of resources and its clauses hunger and poverty. Studies show that a large amount of grain to feed livestock, this…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If this were to be practiced then it would be acceptable and justified to eat animal meat. But, as long as humans continue to mistreat animals before killing or experimenting on them, utilitarian’s will not condone this. Utilitarian’s require humans to treat the animals like human’s and if they fail to do this then we should not use them to experiment on or to kill and eat. This is a positive aspect to the theory because we take animals for granted. Some animals are our companions, or they simply bring us happiness in different ways.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics is defined as Rules of behavior based on ideas about what is morally good and bad. I believe it is unethical for humans to cause pain to animals unless strictly for consumption or vital purposes. I believe it is morally right for animals to have a certain level of protection against animal cruelty. People argue that animals do not have the autonomy that human beings have and there for should not be provided rights. Such people believe that animals were only placed on Earth strictly for human use, that they cannot be rational or experience emotions, and lack autonomy.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thesis Statement Animals deserve rights, and these rights should annihilate the problems with animal abuse, abandonment, and animal experimentation. Purpose Statement The purpose of this research paper is to discuss animal rights and what animals right activist ideology fight for which includes animal abuse, abandonment, experimentation, and laws that prevent inhuman actions towards animals.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Animal Rights Should animals have rights? If so, should these rights be comparable to those given to humans? Animal Rights are rights believed to be owed to animals in order for them to live full lives, free from suffering. Animals are currently being used, and in some cases abused, in medical research, clothing industries, hunting for sport, food, and population control, and countless other services to humans. As is the case with all ethical issues, there are two defined perspectives and supporters of the current and future treatment given and due to animals.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Name: Lily Date: Endangered Animals How would you feel if animals were staring at you as you sat in a small cage? That’s how animals feel in zoo’s. Some people think zoos aren’t prisons I think critters should be saved from animal prisons or zoos.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important in the society and the need to treat them with respect is paramount.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays