Sanford case, which would create another reason on why slavery needed to be abolished. This event happened before the start of the Civil War, so it gave the north leverage on why we needed a ratification of the Constitution. Dred Scott was a slave who moved to a state that allowed slavery, from a state that did not allow slavery. He believed that he deserved the right to be a free slave now, to not be forced into slavery just because he moved into a slaveholding state. Scott brought this point up to the United States Supreme Court because he wanted to see and receive justice. It was a bold move by Scott since he was an african-american slave at that time to go against a federal court ruled by whites. However, he had the courage and passion to fight for the rights that he thought he was entitled to. Roger B. Tawney, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, disagreed strongly with Scott’s points and request. Tawney was strongly opposed to an abolitionist movement and believed that slavery was ethically and morally right. The final verdict in the case was that no slaves, even those who were free, would ever be granted citizenship and treated one hundred percent as an official United States
Sanford case, which would create another reason on why slavery needed to be abolished. This event happened before the start of the Civil War, so it gave the north leverage on why we needed a ratification of the Constitution. Dred Scott was a slave who moved to a state that allowed slavery, from a state that did not allow slavery. He believed that he deserved the right to be a free slave now, to not be forced into slavery just because he moved into a slaveholding state. Scott brought this point up to the United States Supreme Court because he wanted to see and receive justice. It was a bold move by Scott since he was an african-american slave at that time to go against a federal court ruled by whites. However, he had the courage and passion to fight for the rights that he thought he was entitled to. Roger B. Tawney, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, disagreed strongly with Scott’s points and request. Tawney was strongly opposed to an abolitionist movement and believed that slavery was ethically and morally right. The final verdict in the case was that no slaves, even those who were free, would ever be granted citizenship and treated one hundred percent as an official United States