Home Page
Dred Scott V. Sanford Case Summary

Dred Scott V. Sanford Case Summary

Decent Essays

Show More

As a Supreme Court justice who aided in the decision of the Dred Scott v. Sanford case, I was in favor of Dred Scott. My decision was based mainly on the fact that Dr. John Emerson moved Dred Scott to the state of Illinois and later to the state of Wisconsin. Slavery was prohibited in both Illinois and Wisconsin, which was indeed a fair argument for Dred Scott, being that he has lived in both states for a long period of time, even married his wife, Harriet Robinson in the free state of Wisconsin. After the death of Dr. Emerson, Scott and his family should have been considered. According to the Missouri law, it that states, “any person, black or white, held in wrongful enslavement could sue for freedom”. Unfortunately, Chief Justice Roger

Related Documents

Improved Essays
State V. Stewart Case Study
- 728 Words
- 3 Pages
State V. Stewart Case Study

The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…
- 728 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Dred Scott Vs Sandford Case Study
- 495 Words
- 2 Pages
Dred Scott Vs Sandford Case Study

Dred Scott is a man who was a slave all over the United States. He had first lived in Virginia, where he was a slave. Then his slave owner had moved to St. Louis, and brought Dred Scott with, but set him free. However, he was immediately sold again, but then his slave owner moved to Illinois, where it is technically a free state. However, his slave owner had moved to Louisiana, where it is in the slave state region.…
- 495 Words
- 2 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Dred Scott V. Sandford: A Prelude To The Civil War
- 1096 Words
- 4 Pages
Dred Scott V. Sandford: A Prelude To The Civil War

Slavery and Westward Expansion had a very volatile relationship in the Antebellum era America and would contribute to the American Civil War. Westward expansion and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be a way to preserve unity within the Union, but over the next 30 years, ties between the Northern and Southern states would be strained as more territory is gained and the question regarding slavery’s place within these new lands. Through an analysis of book and article sources, one gains the idea that Westward expansion, slavery, and the place of Africans and their rights would continue to tear away at the union until it was ripped apart when South Carolina secedes from the Union and is followed by six more states after the election of President…
- 1096 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Decent Essays
Dred Scott V. Sanford & Plessy Vs. Ferguson
- 798 Words
- 4 Pages
Dred Scott V. Sanford & Plessy Vs. Ferguson

Dred Scott V Sanford & Plessy V Ferguson Slavery was a horrific drawback and set a bad reputation for the U.S. Many people didn’t receive their full rights until long after african americans were deemed free and equal to white mankind. Have you ever wondered how the U.S. became the free country it is today? Where any man or women can live with life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Well unfortunately the U.S. wasn't always like this.…
- 798 Words
- 4 Pages
Decent Essays

Read More
Great Essays
Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay
- 1680 Words
- 7 Pages
Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay

Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri that had travelled with his master to the free state of Illinois. After his master died he believed that he was free because he was now in a free state and petitioned for his freedom. Once this case made its way up to the Supreme Court the ruling was in favor of the South, wherever slave owners move they maintain the rights to their slaves, even if they move to a free state. Again, the North was not happy. This ruling meant that slavery could potentially exist in the North as well; once again slavery was somehow creeping into the North.…
- 1680 Words
- 7 Pages
Great Essays

Read More
Decent Essays
John Marshall's Speech At The Constitutional Convention Of 1787
- 618 Words
- 3 Pages
John Marshall's Speech At The Constitutional Convention Of 1787

At the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the delegates shared a commitment to an independent judiciary. People thought it would be good to have a co equal branch to serve alongside the legislative and executive branches.but delegates did not show up to philadelphia with a fully developed plan for the judicial branch. It has the ability to create courts, interpret the law,determining whether a specific law conforms to the Constitution,and applying the law to specific cases, typically ones that are disputed. john marshall became the fourth chief justice of the united states in 1801. A major influence in his life during the revolutionary war was george washington which was a close friend of marshalls.…
- 618 Words
- 3 Pages
Decent Essays

Read More
Great Essays
Dred Scott Supreme Court Case Analysis
- 1442 Words
- 6 Pages
Dred Scott Supreme Court Case Analysis

Throughout the mid-18th century, the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision became a key contributing factor in the separation between the Union and Confederacy going into the American Civil War. With the conflict of proslavery and antislavery groups fighting for new states, this choice became a debated topic within the detached United States for the effect it had in the slavery legal and economic system. Riots transpired and differences between political leaders and Court justices arose as the decision was made. Historical documents, like the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the U.S. Constitution, were used within this court case by Chief Justice Roger Taney to lead towards the defeat of Scott.…
- 1442 Words
- 6 Pages
Great Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case
- 1043 Words
- 5 Pages
Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case

The ruling of the case said that no African-American had rights and that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. Many of the northern states denounced the law which led to the formation of the Republican party. Historians believe that the ruling of this case was the biggest mistake that the Supreme Court ever made. If it was not for Dred Scott’s perseverance and motivation for the issue of freedom and citizenship for African - Americans the issue may have never come up. Even though Dred Scott and his family did not receive their freedom from this case, they did keep their family together through the case, which was unheard of during this time.…
- 1043 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Civil War Dbq Essay
- 870 Words
- 4 Pages
Civil War Dbq Essay

Dred Scott was a former slave whose slave’s owner moved to a free state where slavery is prohibited. When they returned to Missouri Scott sued for his freedom that he had by living in a free territory. The discussion take place during the trial was basically that a Negro slave descendants free or not were not apart of the people. Africans were inferior and had no right of a white man. They also challenged the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution by stating that the situation is not warranted by the constitution.…
- 870 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
The Civil War: The Kansas-Nebraska Act
- 1083 Words
- 5 Pages
The Civil War: The Kansas-Nebraska Act

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney, was a previous slave proprietor from Maryland. The United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks - slaves as well as free - were not and could never become citizens of the United States. Court’s majority decided that because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, believed that blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic,…
- 1083 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Argumentative Essay: The Dred Scott Case
- 758 Words
- 4 Pages
Argumentative Essay: The Dred Scott Case

Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…
- 758 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Pros And Cons Of The Lincoln-Douglas Debates
- 1170 Words
- 5 Pages
Pros And Cons Of The Lincoln-Douglas Debates

Sandford. Lincoln tried to force Douglas to choose between his principle of popular sovereignty proposed in his Kansas-Nebraska Act which created the new territories of Kansas and Nebraska and endowed the citizens the legislative power to decide, through popular sovereignty, whether or not they would allow slavery, and the decision reached by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. The case surrounded an enslaved African American man that was suing for his freedom after being held captive within the boundaries of two free states. The issues before the court had been whether or not entering “free” territory made a slave free and whether this freedom granted blacks the ability to sue in federal court. The justices ruled that under the language of the constitution did not apply to blacks because within the context of when the constitution was written, slaves were seen solely as property and had no rights.…
- 1170 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
The Causes Of Sectionalism In The Early 1800s
- 1041 Words
- 5 Pages
The Causes Of Sectionalism In The Early 1800s

Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…
- 1041 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
What Are The Pros And Cons Of Pro Slavery
- 1551 Words
- 7 Pages
What Are The Pros And Cons Of Pro Slavery

Pro and anti-pro arguments on slavery All right everyone. We are having a vote on slavery. We will have two arguments for each, pro-slavery and anti slavery. Listen wisely so that you are able to vote on the argument that you agree with. So up first we have the reasons on why we should have slavery.…
- 1551 Words
- 7 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Decent Essays
What Was The Cause Of The Civil War?
- 359 Words
- 2 Pages
What Was The Cause Of The Civil War?

The cause of the civil war began because of the division between the northern states and the southern states in regards to the rights of blacks; the owning of slaves; and the economic ties of the north and south. Many whites did not see blacks as equals. According to Waldo E. Martin, "White Americans were unable to see blacks as Americans like themselves, entitled to the rights and responsibilities of citizenships." In 1857, A Missouri slave, Dred Scott argued with the Supreme Court that because he lived as a free man on free soil for a number of years that he was considered a free man.…
- 359 Words
- 2 Pages
Decent Essays

Read More

Related Topics