Why Is Capital Punishment Unfair

Superior Essays
Throughout America 's history, the death sentence, known as capital punishment, has induced a sizable bulk of controversy in the judicial system. Capital punishment’s reputation of being unfair has provoked debates about the practicality of death as an effective deterrent to murder. Since its reinstatement in 1977, capital punishment’s trials have been fair regarding race, but unfair to male and economically disadvantaged offenders. Rather than re-abolishing an effective deterrent to murder, steps should be taken to improve the fairness of the trial process.

Public opinion on the death penalty has constantly changed due to negligent judges, biased courts, and sheer lack of evidence for sentencing. The first time the practicality of capital
…show more content…
While perhaps more ethical, it is certainly not more effective. There are multiple cases in which life without parole did not hinder murderers from murdering or sometimes even remaining in prison. Murders can still murder in prison. In fact, from 1983-2002, an average of 31 per 100,000 people were annually murdered in prison.

One example of life without parole being ineffective was the imprisonment of Dawud Mu’Min. In 1973, Mu 'Min murdered a cab driver. He was captured and given a life sentence without parole. Later, he escaped prison and in 1988, he robbed and murdered a store keeper named Gladys Nopwasky. Mu 'Min was soon caught after his second homicide and given the death sentence. If Mu 'Min had received the death sentence after his first kill, he would have been unable to murder
…show more content…
In 1995, Jesse and Bobbie were accused of the abduction and murder of Etta Ann Urdiales, the ex-wife of Bobbie 's husband. The siblings had separate and especially unfair trials. Jesse admitted to arranging and committing the abduction, but not committing the murder. At the same time, Bobbie admitted to the murder but, insisted it was involuntary manslaughter. According to both Jesse and Bobbie, Bobbie was holding a gun to Etta 's head, when she accidentally pulled the trigger, killing Etta instantly. Bobbie 's lawyers convinced the judge and jury her story was true and she was only sentenced to 10 years in prison for the involuntary manslaughter. Jesse on the other hand was not so lucky. Since Jesse had arranged the abduction and Etta died because of it, he was held responsible for her death and was executed. Bobbie should have been executed for Etta 's death, because she had the most to gain from the abduction. Etta was constantly trying to prehend child support money from Bobbie and her ex-husband. It is obvious that Jesse abducted Etta for Bobbie. Jesse and the court both made the same mistake of thinking woman would not purposely kill another. Their sexism led to the death of Jesse, and the true murderer 's inconsequential

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Terry Blair Case Study

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He then stated that the previous two victims were prostitutes as well. The dispatcher asked if the caller killed them as well and if he strangled them. The caller admits to it with a simple “Yeah” and hung up. After the police retrieved Carmen Hunt’s body, the caller phoned again saying “You can smell her.” The dispatcher asked why he killed the women. He responded with, “Because they are scum.” The police located the bodies of Darci Williams, 25, and Claudette Juniel, 31.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eubanks 's attempt to kill herself as her final act failed, and she now resides on California 's death row. The most recent of California 's lethal mothers is Sandi Nieves, sentenced to death on October 6, 2000, for killing her four daughters. Nieves used arson to kill her children. All three instances of these multiple murders-those by Buenrostro, Eubanks, and Nieves-were committed out of anger toward an estranged husband or boyfriend. And, if murdering moms are not enough, consider the California case of Caroline Young.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Casey Anthony Case

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Casey was facing charges of first degree murder, aggravated manslaughter of a child, aggravated child abuse and providing false information to government officials. If convicted, Casey would face the death penalty. Baez convinced the jury that Caylee was never missing and that she drowned. Yet everyone still questioned why Casey waited a month to report it. Casey’s defense also stated that George Anthony had found the dead body in the pool and had disposed of it.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jodie Arias Case

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    She was also found guilty for first degree murdering Travis Alexander. She claimed that she lived everyday wishing she could undo what she did to Travis while serve her sentence at Perryville Prison without the possibility of parole after 25 years. For murdering the innocent Travis Alexander, she clearly should receive a death penalty or do voluntary work for the country instead of a sentence at…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Born on March 19, 1986, in Warren, Ohio, Casey Anthony was one of two children of Cindy Anthony and George Anthony, who worked in law enforcement. During her childhood, Anthony accused her father of sexual abuse. This led the media to speculate a motive for the murder. The news states that Casey Anthony killed her daughter in order to get revenge from her father’s torture. This makes the people make more negative judgments about Casey Anthony and how she could’ve possible went to extreme just to get revenge at another problem she faced in life.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The death penalty continuously falls disproportionately on racial minorities.” (Frank Schmalleger) For instance, when criminals murder whites they are more likely to be sentenced to death than are those who murder blacks. The death penalty should never be influenced by arbitrary and unfair circumstances if the government were upholding it, and since we are only human that is inevitable. For example, in the case of the Boston bombing; Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, had been sentenced to death, but it may have been solely because his case was has held at the same location, Boston, as the…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If Mary was a truly major part in this assassination, she would have been mentioned in the journal. According to many people, Mary Surratt is guilty and deserved the punishment. Her innocence failed her when John Lloyd testified against her. Mary had brought over a box for unknown visitors. She also told him that she would like him to get two shooting irons ready that was previously brought by her son.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Almost the same thing happened in the united states, according to the Death Penalty Information Center" Padgett was convicted of murdering his estranged wife in 1990 and was sentenced to death. The conviction was overturned by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals in 1995 (Padgett v. Alabama, 668 So. 2d 78 (1995)). In October, 1997, Padgett was acquitted of all charges at a retrial. There was some evidence presented that another woman had committed the crime.…

    • 2124 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Back in 1977, Brian Baldwin was accused of the murder of Naomi Rolon and was put to death. A decade after his execution, forensic evidence found proo that Edward Horsley was the actual murderer of Naomi Rolon (Fridell 108). Sure, these instances are rare, but why take the chance of killing an innocent human…

    • 1008 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In discussions of capital punishment, one controversial issue has been whether or not the death penalty benefits the states that enforce capital punishment. On the one hand, those who oppose the death penalty argues that capital punishment is inhumane and should not be used to end someone’s life. On the other hand, those in favor of capital punishment firmly believe that the death penalty is the only way to make the world just. My own view is: the death penalty gives life value and justice; it helps reduce prison crowding, and ensures public safety. Americans today tend to believe that the death penalty is inhumane and if the government kills someone they are decreasing the value of life.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics