Texas Death Penalty Analysis

I am writing this letter to convey my thoughts over the issue of the death penalty. The death penalty continues to be a matter of dispute and will be argues in the States for many years. The death penalty is currently used by 27 states and is used by the federal government for punishing federal crimes. However, in Texas, the death penalty should be banned, and instead of executing these criminals, the state of Texas should sentence them to life in prison. By abolishing death penalty, and instead of executing criminals, simply sentencing them for life in prison can help the United States save a significant amount of money. Executing a criminal through death penalty costs much more money than by just simply putting them in jail for the rest of their life. The State’s economy is currently under the debt of $18 trillion …show more content…
According to the statistics “murder is the third cause of occupational death among men, and leading cause among women” (Tucker). People believe that the “victims of the crimes are also the principal witnesses” and one way to prevent the witnesses from testifying against you is “to kill them” (Tucker). Data also shows that when death penalty was abolished “murder rates nearly tripled, rising to an all-time high in the 1980’s” (Tucker). Therefore, people believe that death penalty is a justified law as it help keep the crime and murder rates at a lower level. In conclusion, death penalty should be abolished as it takes too much money, executes innocent lives, and does not give a chance to the criminals to reform. The death penalty is also inhumane as one is killing another individual. By killing the criminal, there is no difference between the criminal and the government, as both of them are taking life of individuals. Instead of killing people, the criminals should be sentenced for life in prison and should bear the consequences of their