Persuasive Essay Pro Death Penalty

Improved Essays
While people are put in this world to make an everlasting impact, whether it is a positive or negative change only they can control what mark they leave… others just get to decide the consequences. For those unaware of being sentenced to the death penalty is an extreme execution served by the government and must surpass plenty of levels for this punishment to be accomplished properly. Some dispute that the death penalty is in humane and wrong while others find the ruling fair and brings justice to those whose lives have been permanently scarred just by their wrong doings. While some feel the way you kill is how you should be exterminated, like the old saying goes, “an eye for an eye”. Death penalty is one way to bring closure to those affected …show more content…
There is no proven fact that with everyone being aware of this form of disciplinary action that the crime rates are lowered because people do what they want for their own reasons even though it is common knowledge that murder and serious crimes are illegal. “The death penalty honors human dignity by treating the defendant as a free moral actor able to control his own destiny for good or for ill; it does not treat him as an animal with no moral sense.” (10 pros and cons). Life without parole (LWOP) cases will cost $1.2 million $3.6 million more than equivalent death penalty cases at taxpayers expense due to them still requiring certain factors to still be ‘alive’. The up front costs of the death penalty are significantly higher than for equivalent LWOP cases and there also appears to be no question that, over time, equivalent LWOP cases are much more expensive... than death penalty cases. Taxpayers shouldn't have to provide for those who are guilty of crimes that should be handled with the death penalty, especially if the inmates are sentenced to life in prison just if they're going to die in cell it's cheaper and makes more sense to end the sentence short instead of having it linger. Suicides kill more inmates than homicide, overdoses, and accidents combined even with the current rate averaging to fifteen out of 100,000 inmates (Smith, Alexander). “Whoever sheds man's blood by mannish blood shall be shed; for in the image of God He made man. ” (Genesis 9:6

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Jason Mayland Mrs. Bauch Speech May 13, 2016 How many of you have heard about crimes so horrible that they sound like came out of a horror story? Today I?m going to try and persuade you into why capital punishment is good and why it should be reinstated. I have learned while researching that inmates that are in for life cost the tax payers and the state tons of money annually. I?ll do this by first, discussing what is wrong with the capital punishment system right now, Second, I will discuss some possible solutions to fix it, and finally, I will discuss why the changes to the capital punishment system will be beneficial.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the costs of the death penalty varies from state to state and even between different counties the taxpayers are still the sole providers to how the counties can even afford the option of pursuing the death penalty. The Dallas County District Attorney, Norman Kinne says, ‘”If you can be satisfied with putting a person in the penitentiary for the rest of his life…I think we have to be satisfied with that as opposed to spending $1 million to try and get them executed.”’ Kinne, makes a plausible point as he argues that although morally one might have stronger feelings about ‘eye for an eye’ and doing to one what they’ve done to others; in the long run it is more cost effective to just lock them away in the penitentiary than to waste taxpayer dollars on one trial that might not even end up with the outcome originally pursued. While most of the costs that accumulate from these kinds of cases are from the trials themselves, the process of appeals that the offenders get if they are sentenced the death penalty takes a serious toll on not only the financial aspect of the government, but the time it takes to go through that…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Around the vast globe, thousands of people are sentenced to death annually (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). Should the government execute people who commit heinous crimes? In 2014, in the United States alone, 35 people were ripped of their lives on the execution table (The Death Penalty V. Human Rights: Why Abolish the Death Penalty?). It is a common belief that the death penalty is a sufficient punishment for people who commit hostile and death-provoking crimes. Yet, what justice is served by the taking of another human life?…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In conclusion, death penalty should be abolished as it takes too much money, executes innocent lives, and does not give a chance to the criminals to reform. The death penalty is also inhumane as one is killing another individual. By killing the criminal, there is no difference between the criminal and the government, as both of them are taking life of individuals. Instead of killing people, the criminals should be sentenced for life in prison and should bear the consequences of their…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hammurabi Punishment

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty continues to be a hot topic of debate around the United States. There are those who debate whether the death penalty should be abolished and there are those who affirm or agree with the death penalty. There are those who say it is morally wrong to have the death penalty imposed while others say “an eye for an eye.” While these may be two of the biggest arguments against the death penalty there are also ones that state that the death penalty does not deter criminals from committing the same crime while several other studies show that it is a suitable deterrence for crime. Several states have already abolished the death penalty.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty should be abolished in the rest of the states that it remains legal in. “The death penalty is the ultimate irreversible denial of human rights. ”(Insert Citation) The U.S.A is one of the only nine countries in the world to have carried out an execution every year, in the years 2009 and 2013. The other countries that still carry out the death penalty are Bangladesh, China, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, and Yemen.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate with the motion “Abolish the Death Penalty”, Diann Rust-Tierney argues that the death penalty is an insecure and hurtful policy that does not help advance public safety. Diann claims that the death penalty is not giving the public any safety nor does it decrease violence. Arguing that it is a waste of taxpayer money that could be used to improve law enforcement training. She later argues that the death penalty is an outdated system that is bias towards race and color, claiming that black men are less likely to be sentenced to death even though they are most likely to be victims of homicide. Diann ends her argument with a humanitarian statement that we as humans have the ability to change our way of life and we should not have to take…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan.” This is the Hippocratic Oath which scholars estimate dates back to the fourth century B.C. Most modern day doctors mistakenly choose not to take this oath. The debate over an individual’s right to die dates back as far as the oath itself. This “right” has taken over society and has shown nothing but negative effects.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Passaro Case

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Maintaining the death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in general population. The death penalty is enormously expensive with no clear benefits. Now the real question at hand is, is it worth it to give these criminals something that they are already wanting - the death penalty - and really have no justice served? Some may argue that the price for the execution of a murderer is very much beneficial because they are no longer standing in our society. Most of these sayings are biased because their wanting of the death penalty is tied in with morals.…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 Life on Death Row The number of inmates in today’s prisons serving time on death row has increased to over 3000 since 1968. This doesn’t necessary mean that more individuals are involved in more criminal activity that would issue them a death sentence But, it has become a very slow process to carry out the sentence to persons convicted by a jury of their peers. This seems to be a growing problem, when an individual is sentenced to death there are certain rights they have in order to protect the convicted persons.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the topic of the Death Penalty you have to ask yourself the morality of what you are doing, and if other human beings should have the right to take the life of someone else for what you deem as wrong above and beyond the normal crime. From an economic standpoint you realize that it is extremely inefficient not only in terms of time, but in the sheer amount of money it takes for the death penalty to actually be handed down making it more economically inefficient. I. Monetary Cost a. Texas i. Being the state with the largest amount of executions I deemed it fitting to be seen as a key component of defining how much it really costs to actually have the death penalty take place. ii.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To forcefully end someone’s life is the most heinous thing a person can do. That is, according to many, unless they deserve it. Murder is wrong, and those who commit murder are bad. So through some logic, the government sees fit that murdering murderer’s is ok.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That “an eye for an eye” isn’t necessarily the right way to handle such heinous crimes. Whereas most of the United States feel as though life without parole would be the best option for these criminals. An article from the ACLU website states, “No one sentenced to life without parole has ever been released on parole. Prisoners sentenced to LWOP actually stay in prison until they die.” Statics show that one of the biggest reasons the death penalty should be abolished is because of the amount of money spent to execute a person.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A life is something that we cherish the most. From humans to cats and everywhere in between someone somewhere cares for that life. But sometimes people commit offenses that take the life of another away. This leaves us with the hard decision of what do with those who commit these crimes. Do we take from them what they have taken from another or, do we lock them away for life to let them think about what they have done.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does the death penalty deter crime, especially murder? Is the death penalty just? Should the death penalty be reformed? The death penalty also known as capital punishment continues to be an issue of controversy for many years. It seems that public opinion on the death penalty has changed over the year and is still changing, but there are still other people who believe that the death penalty is a good punishment and will continue to believe.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics