Mugsy's Argument Against Euthanasia

Improved Essays
Inspiration
While growing up, I have been curious about the topic of euthanasia. My curiosity began shortly after the death of my beloved poodle, Mugsy. On one summer day near my family’s garden, he was found lying motionless and unresponsive. Following the veterinarian’s close examination, he was diagnosed with an incurable heat stroke. With very few options left, the veterinarian asked my family the life or death question: “Should Mugsy be euthanized?” After much thought, we decided to pull the plugs, euthanizing him. Mugsy’s euthanasia served as the beginning of my motivation to research the topic.
Context
Compared to the many possible causes of death, euthanasia may be considered to be the gentlest. Typically, when a person or animal
…show more content…
The first contains the opinion of a doctor who opposes euthanasia (Opinion 2.21 – Euthanasia). The doctor stresses that euthanizing someone is equivalent to abandoning them. Even when a person’s condition seems impossible to fix, there is still hope. Thus, euthanizing them would discard all of the remaining hope. Also, since the medical professionals performing the operation are ending lives, they are forced to assume unique responsibility. This responsibility is one that is contradictory to what their job description entails, which is to restore and improve lives. In summation, the doctor understands the possibility to consider euthanizing someone, but suggests that euthanasia does more harm than good. Another opinion is the one of The National Spinal Cord Injury Association (NSCIA 's Position on Assisted Suicide). This medical corporation is one that commonly encounters severe spinal injuries, with some severe enough to consider euthanasia. Similar to the opinion in the previous paragraph, the company disagrees with the idea of euthanizing someone. Saddened to hear news of recent assisted suicides, they express their dislike of the decision to euthanize someone in an official company statement. Although the statement is primarily focused on occurrences that involve spinal injuries, their opinion on euthanasia is expressed clearly. They state that no matter how bad life may seem, it is …show more content…
Following some scouring, I found a short informational video (Euthanasia Should Be Legal) with the type of content I desired. The video begins with the words: “Suffering is not an option”, suggesting that people should not even have the opportunity to live and suffer. This point is somewhat odd because people in a state that warrants consideration of euthanasia are not always suffering. For example, a person in an irreversible coma is in a state of unconsciousness, feeling absolutely nothing from their body. Thus, the numbness associated with the condition of the person disproves the statement made in the beginning of the video. The video goes on to show why people would disagree with the idea of euthanization, pointing religion as the major influence. However, in the surveys from myself and the internet (See Appendix B), religion was not the major influence for euthanasia objection. Therefore, this video is minimally accurate and can only be used as a starting brace for my search for pro-euthanasia support. After continued research, I found another video with support for euthanasia. The video, titled: I Helped My Daughter Die, is documentary based on a mother’s decision to help her suffering daughter die. In support for euthanasia, the documentary stresses the importance of ending life when appropriate. Although the mother was forced to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome. Nowadays, euthanasia comes in four main different forms. The first one is “active” euthanasia, which happens when a person directly and deliberately causes the patient's death. The second form is “passive” euthanasia: someone does not directly take the patient's life, but just allows the person to die. The third form is called “voluntary” euthanasia and it occurs at the request of the person who dies. The fourth form is called “involuntary” euthanasia, or “non voluntary”, and it occurs when the person is unconscious or otherwise unable to make a meaningful choice between living and dying, and an appropriate person takes the decision on their behalf. The two most controversial forms are the “active” euthanasia and the…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide. Then I will utilize aspects of James Rachels paper, “The Morality of Euthanasia”, in order to illustrate how active euthanasia can be morally permissible. Afterward, I will explain some aspects of my argument that others might find fault in and refute…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    No person should have to endure terminal suffering that is unremitting, unbearable, or prolonged. When the burdens of life outweigh the benefits because of uncontrollable pain, severe psychological suffering, loss of dignity, or loss of quality of life as judged by the patient, and when the circumstances are not remediable, the dying person should be able to ask for and receive help in assisted suicide (Marker, Smith 47-51). It is further argued that assisted suicide for incurably ill persons experiencing extreme suffering can be distinguished from euthanasia used for the purpose of genocide on the grounds that it is based on principles of dignity, honor, and respect and is chosen and enacted by the dying individuals, rather than being forced on them against their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The autonomy of the physician is also evaluated. Most often only the patient is discussed in the evaluation of the case for euthanasia. The physician also has rights as to perform the act they are being asked to perform. Physicians have a right to make the decision to agree with euthanasia or not. The physician has great moral and ethical decisions that need to be weighed. The physicians role as healer would ultimately be questioned. In the article from Margaret Somerville, “Would Euthanasia Damage Doctors” she examines the impact of euthanasia upon physicians and the medical community's…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is a serious issue in today’s society. Euthanasia is the act of relieving someone of his or her suffering by intentionally ending his or her life. Many people argue that euthanasia is beneficial to the person suffering as well as his or her family. On the other hand, many people argue that euthanasia is morally wrong. Overall, euthanasia is not beneficial to anyone, and the practice should be stopped for good.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A debatable and controversial topic of today's society would be if Euthanasia or physician- assisted suicide should be legal or illegal. This paper will discuss what is Euthanasia? Why doctors are against it, and where it’s legal or illegal?…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For the sake of time, I will consider PAS and euthanasia as essentially the same practice. Thus these terms will be used interchangeably, except in citations, which will always use the term stated by the source. I will also avoid the moral or religious arguments against these practices, not because they are invalid, but because the inclusion of such arguments would lengthen this speech beyond the imposed limits. Instead I will argue that legalizing euthanasia, even if initially for a good purpose, leads to severe ethical consequences. These consequences can be summarized as the danger to doctors, the danger to patients, and the danger to…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is the act of a physician or other third party ending a patient 's life in response to severe, persistent and untreatable pain and suffering ( Morrow, 2016). Throughout the world we live in today this is a very touchy subject and has brought about a number of moral dilemmas, such as that people have a right to self-determination, and should definitely have the right to decide their own fate, or helping an individual with the knowing and accepting of their death is better than allowing them to continuously suffer. The main question surrounding this hot controversy is whether this process is ethical or not; should human beings have the right to decide on issues of life and death? When further looking into the different types…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There has been a lot of debate over whether or not physician assisted suicide or PSA/E is morally permissible. This paper will cover both physician assisted suicide and euthanasia, which has not normally been argued in one discussion. This paper will argue that PSA/E is morally permissible and will include the most prominent objections also. Topics covered will include quality of life and individual rights, and the correct use of physician assisted-suicide. The utilitarian argument of less suffering and comparing the euthanization of animals to the euthanization of humans will also be discussed. The objections that will be discredited include the exploitation of the doctor 's lead role as a healer, fear of abuse, and that the alternatives to…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Somerville offers a perspective of the impacts euthanasia would have if it became legal. She argues that if euthanization were to be allowed, we would need to be careful in our definition. In 1985, the Netherland’s definition only limited euthanasia to voluntary, not involuntary. Since involuntary euthanasia was not included in the definition, the guidelines that were placed did not have to be used. Our definitions “... are not just innocent tools that allow us to describe reality. Rather they shape our perceptions of reality” (Somerville 27). If the definition of euthanasia is broad it can be interpreted different ways which can lead to improper use. This is crucial for our medical…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Often times when one’s pet gets sick, they are taken to the vet. Unfortunately, sometimes we are told we have to “put them down”. This is heartbreaking, but it is generally seen as an act of mercy. However, when it comes to “putting down” a human, also called euthanasia, people argue that it’s murder, and not an act of mercy. Euthanasia is a peaceful way of dying for those who no longer wish to live, and don’t want to suffer anymore.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia, physician assisted suicide, is the painless killing of a person suffering a painful terminal disease or coma. There are many controversies associated with euthanasia and its background. Though some consider euthanasia and assisted suicide two different things, they share the same goals. The goal is to cause a painless death to individuals by request. Euthanasia has many positive meanings to it. Many individuals do not see the upside to this topic. Euthanasia should be considered legal, it supports human rights in a variety of ways, and individuals should understanding the perspective of euthanasia in the stand point of a terminally ill patient.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ever since the late 1930s, euthanasia has been a very sore subject both for the courts and American society. The question of whether people who suffer from terminal illnesses should end their life early sticks in the mind of doctors and psychologists alike. In my opinion, voluntary active euthanasia is morally wrong and is nothing more than voluntary homicide. However, when the person who suffers from the terminal illness is no longer able to make decisions for themselves, and they no longer possess the ability to carry out necessary bodily functions without assistance, the freedom to choose is left up to either the doctor, or the caretaker of that person.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Depending on the situations, voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia can be looked upon as voluntary manslaughter (someone kills another person, but situation can somewhat justify their actions) or murder. Euthanasia is divided into two different categories, passive euthanasia and active euthanasia. This paper is to briefly explore euthanasia and the different definitions, and to explore whether active euthanasia should be practiced in the United States or abroad.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting. One great thinker that has examined the morality of what has become known as voluntary euthanasia is Professor Peter Singer. Singer, in general, believes that voluntary euthanasia is morally permissible and goes to great lengths supporting his viewpoint. Despite his well-supported opinion, there are other thinkers that disagree with his moral reasoning. Each of those philosophers explains in detail the flaws…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays