The Pros And Cons Of Active And Passive Euthanasia

Superior Essays
Euthanasia and suicide are controversial topics over the years. There have been so many arguments that either advocate or oppose the ethic of euthanasia. The two essay below are evident examples of those arguments and each has some solid points. Furthermore, I will present my response to the essay and also my point of view on this matter. Active and Passive Euthanasia
The purpose of the first essay written by James Rachel is to argue that the active euthanasia should be used rather than passive euthanasia. Euthanasia is the act of allowing or killing painlessly someone with incurable and painful disease to die. The author opposes the idea that it is permissible to stop the treatment and allow the patient to die, but it is not allowable
…show more content…
What is rejected is the freedom to cause death whether by suicide or by assisting in one.” The community should support suffering people’s decision to live on rather than encouraging them to end their life so the pain can stop. In other words, when a physician is legally allowed to end one’s life with one’s consent, it means that the physician takes part in determining what that life is worth or whether this life is meaningful enough to sustain. This principle does not guarantee protection for powerless and voiceless people, the very young and the very old as well as the racial minorities.
Thirdly, the author also articulates that a physician could make mistake in determining if a patient’s disease could be cured or not. The mistake could stem from research interests, desire for organs, and mistakes in diagnosis. The bottom line of this essay is “even if the practice of euthanasia were to be confined to those who voluntarily request an end to their lives, no physician could in good conscience participate in such an act. To decide directly to cause the death of a patient is to abandon a cardinal principle of medical practice
…show more content…
After reading them, I have become more strongly believed in my stand that euthanasia should not be legalized and suicide should not be advocated. I totally agreed with the first argument of Arthur Dyck regarding suicide brings harm to not just one’s self but to others. Suicide is considered a selfish act because a death decided by one’s self always leaves a great pain in the living individuals such as family, friends, and spouses. It implies one’s life is meaningless and disregarding all the happy memories that individual had with the people around him/her. The people who live on could have regrets and pain for years because of one’s death. According to the ethic of benemortasia, that death could not be considered a “happy” or “good” death.
To further extend my point, a meaningful life is a life which leaves happy memories even when they are dead. Dyck states, “The sequence of dying an inevitable death can be much better accepted than the decision on the part of a dying one that he or she has no worth to anyone. An act that presupposes that final declaration leaves tragic overtones for anyone who participated in even the smallest way in that person 's

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Should Euthanasia be banned? The topic of euthanasia arouses much ethical debate and controversy. Euthanasia is the termination of a person’s life to end their suffering, usually through the injection of drugs. Debates about the ethics of euthanasia and medical assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics and concerns in our society. It crosses many social, political, emotional and moral boundaries which is something many subjects cannot do all at once. This paper is meant to show my personal view on this controversial subject. Margaret Battin’s article ‘Euthanasia: The Fundamental Issues,’ discusses three moral principles that are typically used to argue for the legalization of euthanasia as a regulated practice. These three principles are; the Principle of Mercy, the Principle of (patient) Autonomy, and the Principle of Justice.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If doctors are enabled the decision to terminate a life on behalf of a unconscious patient, they would be then granted a power over society that not only breaches the Hippocratic Oath, but also empowers them to “play God”. This responsibility could then reflect upon society, altering their views and their trust within doctors and medical professionals as they could then be seen as “providers of death” (Cosic, 2003. 25) In addition to this, a doctor’s decision to terminate a life may not rely on the condition and best interests of the patient, but instead of amount of hospital beds and facilities that are…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, Steinbock tries to refute the claims about euthanasia presented by James Rachels, and tries to show how Rachel’s misinterpreted the American Medical Association 's doctrine regarding euthanasia. Steinbock states that contrary to Rachel’s interpretation, the AMA does not endorse any type of euthanasia, and that the termination of life is never the goal in a professional medical practice. Steinbock argues that Rachel 's error in his essay was the linkage of ending “extraordinary care” and passive euthanasia. Steinbock says that stoppage of extraordinary care or treatment that would prolong one 's life and creates burden for that patient is not always linked to the intention of death. Steinbock says “there can be a point (to the cessation of life-prolonging treatment) other than an endeavor to bring about the patient’s death,” Steinbock continues to provide examples where withholding treatment does not necessarily mean that this decision was made for the cession of life.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They then move into a hospital culture where a death, even among aged, is seen as a failure,” (102). In physician assisted suicide, it is imperative to realize that the patient is choosing to die with dignity and on their own terms instead of being deteriorated by sickness. Ultimately, a doctor’s main purpose is to cure their patient, but in extreme cases with no cure, there is nothing one can do except to alleviate suffering. By giving the patient the choice of death, physicians are allowing their patient to die on their own terms and with…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect” (Anderson, Ryan n.p.).This is a vital statement of Anderson’s writing, and a crucial piece of why this writer believes it is unethical and unprogressive for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia to exist. Anderson believes that if the philosophy of euthanasia was put into full affect it would endanger anyone who is sick: the “weak and the venerable.” He believes that doctors and the people who decides who lives or dies such as judges have an emphatic responsibility to protect…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines euthanasia as the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering. There are many different types of euthanasia: voluntary, non-voluntary, and involuntary; euthanasia by action or by omission; and assisted suicide. This essay will focus solely on physician assisted suicide. Medicinenet.com defines assisted suicide as the voluntary termination of one's life by administration of lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance. Dr. Brian Pollard discusses in the article, “Human Rights and Euthanasia” the case of physician assisted suicide and the autonomy of both the patient and the physician.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gerald Dworkin Euthanasia

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Physician-Assisted suicide is a popular debate topic amongst individuals who are medical practitioners, politicians or have had a related incident concerning a family member or friend. In the United States, patients are not assisted with suicide involving the physician, but with a pill intake. The practice of euthanasia is illegal throughout most of the United States except for Washington, Oregon, California, Vermont and Bernalillo County, New Mexico and Montana. Other countries around the world, specifically Switzerland, permit the physician to inject their patient to their death. The decision regarding patient suicide should be granted to the patient and one other family member or friend.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To further differentiate their view points, these authors use varying structural, linguistic, and reference styles throughout their essays. II. Structure Despite a similar start in the form of an abstract in both “Death With Dignity” and “Redefining Physicians’ Role”, both essays quickly branch off into different structural formats. After the abstract, Lehman and Prokopetz begin to detail PAS’ rise in prominence in the medical community and the treatments triumphs in several legal battles, but quickly present a new problem posed by some in the medical community saying, “Many medical professionals are uncomfortable with the idea of physicians playing an active role in ending patients' lives… This position is not an insurmountable barrier, however; we propose a system that would remove the physician from direct involvement in the process” (97), thus creating the framework for a conversation on how a physician could opt out of providing an…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Active euthanasia is when direct action is taken, ending the life of the patient. I chose to focus my paper on the article entitled “Voluntary Active Euthanasia” written by Dan W. Brock. In "Voluntary Active Euthanasia", Brock analyzes the arguments for and against the legalization of active euthanasia. From his perspective, an individual’s well-being and control over…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper, I am going to talk about the topic of euthanasia. I will argue that active euthanasia is morally permissible in the case of a terminally ill patient who is going through unbearable amounts of pain. Furthermore, the focus of this paper will only be on this type of euthanasia; active euthanasia. However, in the first part of my essay I will not only define what active euthanasia is but I will explain how it differs from other types of euthanasia such as physician-assisted suicide.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are positions against euthanasia, for which will be addressed later in this paper. The point of this paper is to provide a stronger case for the adoption of euthanasia for the benefit of morality and utility. Euthanasia is a method in which a person with an illness or extreme condition…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The evolution of modern medicine has dramatically lengthened the life expectancy of human beings. In many cases, the quality of those life years are satisfactory, and elderly individuals enjoy life. However, there are also many people experience terminal diseases or tragic accidents that reduce their quality of life to the point they no longer want to live. In these cases, patients may plead with their doctor to end their life. Naturally, a physician ending the life of her patient is morally conflicting.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Smriti Kochhar James Rachel in “Active and Passive Euthanasia” tells us the difference between active and passive euthanasia and the role it plays in medical ethics. Being directly involved in the killing of an individual is more socially unacceptable than withholding treatment and watching someone die. However, according to Rachel, both are equally reprehensible. Rachel’s views on active and passive euthanasia are predominantly neutral.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays

Related Topics