Is Assisted Suicide Ethical?

Superior Essays
Is Assisted Suicide Ethical?
Physician-assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia or mercy killing is the act intentionally inducing a painless and quick death to patients who suffer from serious forms of diseases or patients in a permanent coma (Sjöstrand). Normally, it is carried out by a doctor or a nurse. Euthanasia has raised a lot of controversies all over the world and the main argument is based on whether causing a painless death is ethical. The advocates of euthanasia claim that it is ethical to perform euthanasia on terminally ill patients since it is a solution to patients who are hopeless and in great pain. On the other hand, the opponents see euthanasia as a violation of the human right to live and hence, unethical. While many
…show more content…
In other words, euthanasia should be considered a fundamental human right. Human beings have the highest form of life on earth, which should be lived happily and not in pain. To a larger extent, restricting euthanasia among ill patients is just like denying them one of their basic human rights, the right to happiness (Sjöstrand). When our pets suffer from incurable illnesses, such as cancer and we are convinced that they experience a lot of pain every day, we often decide that putting them to sleep is the best solution. This is usually heart-breaking and does not mean that we do not have compassion for those pets, yet, we made that decision to end their lives. Since they are more important than animals, human beings should have the right to decide when to die with dignity just as animals have. Some would argue that if this was offered, patients and doctors could give up on recovery too early. A way to prevent this is by offering assisted suicide to patients who have received all the help they can get and there are signs of improvements only (Dworkin). Despite the current advances and development in the medicinal field, doctors can only manage pain associated with various diseases and therefore, in cases of excruciating pain, it calls for euthanasia. For instance, patients who suffer from terminal illnesses, such as cancer are often in endless pain, …show more content…
Dignity in the sense that their bodies are not wasted due to the endless pain and the medications, yet, there is no hope that they will be cured. Besides, by carrying out euthanasia, doctors and nurses relieve the terminally ill patients of the constant pain they experience. Therefore, assisted suicide is a moral and ethical practice. Works Cited
Dworkin, Ronald. Life's dominion: an argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. Vintage, 2011.
Fletcher, Joseph F. Morals and Medicine: the moral problems of the patient's right to know the truth, contraception, artificial insemination, sterilization, euthanasia. Princeton University Press, 2015.
Muehlenberg, Bill. "Europe: Euthanasia for infants: Europe's shame." News Weekly 2926 (2014): 17.
Sjöstrand, Manne, et al. "Autonomy-based arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia: a critique." Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16.2 (2013): 225-230.
Somerville, Margaret. Death talk: the case against euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP,

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Allowing a patient to have this freedom could bypass tremendous pain and suffering. It would take away the psychological and physical suffering the person is going through. Also, the right to die should be fundamental to each person, and by allowing this type of treatment the patient would have this power. They may want to save lives of others, and there is no law in this country that states suicide is illegal. Lastly, this curative process would keep a patient from committing a horrific and traumatic suicide without the help of a trusting physician.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Michael White who is the member of the Board of Directors at the Death with Dignity National Center gave a speech on “Should Physician- Assisted Suicide be Legalized?” He stated “Physician-assisted suicide should be lawfully medical procedure for competent, terminal ill adults, because it is a compassionate response to relieve the suffering of dying patients.”(“Should Physician- Assisted Suicide be legalized?”). Patients feel unwanted pain, and they should have the right to choose when it is time to leave this…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dignity Vs Euthanasia

    • 2009 Words
    • 8 Pages

    With many controversies with it, it may never be fully legal in the world. The terminally ill go through so much pain that it should be allowed for them, only, to end their lives. The loss of dignity is not worth what family members to go through and may bring more sorrow to them having assisted suicide. Just imagining being in the shoes of a terminally ill person it would be hard to know that the time is coming to die. As doctors are making better medicine hopefully these deadly diseases go away, but until then it should be a right to the patients to end it on their terms.…

    • 2009 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Advocates of Physician-assisted suicide propose that mercy killing is required because patients with a terminal illness, undergo unmanageable suffering. They insist that the only way to eradicate pain is to kill the patient. Patients and their physicians assume that those with a condition will be in a better state of not existing than suffering through pain and depression. Instead of killing the patient who is enduring pain, the better alternative is to guarantee that their suffering is controlled. Once the patient’s illness is managed, they will become less despondent, more in control with their thoughts and will be open to alternative…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example people who are in the early stages of the disease experience minor pain, such pain is common to regular disease and it would be immoral of them to take their life. In order to avoid this we could allow euthanasia to be offered only when the patient is in their late stages of the disease and the pain and suffering is unlike anything people feel with regular diseases. Euthanasia restrictions ensure that people still value their lives and only turn to euthanasia when their life becomes a living hell. We could have people coming in to talk to the patient in detail about the act of euthanasia and what they have to consider before making this choice. This would overcome the common belief that people are either reckless in that they do not value their life or uneducated.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Legalizing Euthanasia “We control our entry into life, it is time we began to control our exit.” - Max Frisch. Euthanasia is a highly controversial debate all around the globe. Opponents argue that using euthanasia to end one’s life is morally erroneous and believe it violates the principles of medicine; proponents believe euthanasia is a considerate way to end the suffering of terminally ill people. With the legalization of euthanasia, many benefits could be added to this country. Bountiful amounts of people with incurable diseases will not have to live in the horrible pain that comes with their disease, current laws will not target these innocent people, and this country will become a better and happier place overall.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nonmaleficence And Suicide

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages

    But in cases of physician assisted suicide, doctors are only providing the patients with lethal drugs, who then administer it to themselves. The physician is not directly causing the patient harm, thus not violating the principle of nonmaleficence or the Hippocratic oath. Also, physician assisted suicide is one of the few options a physician can take to deal with terminally ill patients as their diseases cannot be cured or sufficiently treated. Thus, if a physician does not take action and assist these patients in dying, they are arguably causing the patients more harm by leaving them in a prolonged state of pain and misery. In addition, this principle also tells healthcare professionals to minimize harm, which is exactly the purpose of physician assisted suicide.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In severe cases fluid seeps through the skin which breaks down. Derek Humphry argues that euthanasia is ethically justified as a means of relieving unbearable suffering, as long as it is limited to fully informed adults who specifically request it. Humphry maintains that decisions about dying are highly personal and that euthanasia should not be denied to those who choose it. I agree with Humphry, “Euthanasia should not be denied to those who choose it”. If that patient request it they should not deny it, because I feel like you’ll make the ill patient suffer more if you try to deny their…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should euthanasia be legal in the United States? Originating from the Greek terms "eu" (happy or good) and "thantos" (death), euthanasia literally means "happy death" or "good death". It is commonly defined as, “the act of bringing about the death of a hopelessly ill and suffering person in a relatively quick and painless way for reasons of mercy” (LeBaron 1). Assisted suicide is a form of euthanasia, when a person helps commit suicide or provides information of how to do so to another person. A person taking another person 's life without his or her request in order for that person not to have ample suffering is a mercy killing.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    O’Neill also argues that making euthanasia legal would replace “love with law”. If it is legalized, euthanasia can no longer be considered mercy killing. It would replace a decision that should be made with the consultation of family and doctors with one that is monitored by the government and death-sanctioning lawyers. Ultimately, a government does not care about the patient’s life, adding them into the equation would diminish the love and compassion a terminally ill patient should feel at the end of their life. Legalizing euthanasia would only cause more pain as it would introduce more unneeded stress to the patient.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays