• Home Page
  • The Cruel And Implications Of The English Bill Of Rights

The Cruel And Implications Of The English Bill Of Rights

Improved Essays
Show More
The English bills of rights were written in 1689 after King James II was replaced by Mary, the king’s daughter, and her husband William of Orange. According to the article “English Bill of Rights 1689,” the English Bill of Rights of 1689 was basically British law, passed by the parliament of Great Britain. These laws stated the people’s right and liberties. These laws also laid the foundation for the US Constitution as well as constitutional monarchy in England. (English Bill of Rights 1689, 2015) According to the article “What is constitutional monarchy,” constitutional monarchy is when the queen or king acts as the Head of State, but the Parliament makes and passes legislation. This keeps the king or queen from controlling the laws to meet …show more content…
By not allowing the queen or king to raise armies it helps to control the power of the king. The king or queen cannot take over without an army so by creating this law it keeps the king or queen from becoming a dictator. Also by reducing the ability to raise taxes, by not allowing the queen or king to raise taxes the queen or king is not able to control people with the treats of taxes thus reducing the queen or king’s power. Cruel and unusual punishment was also a way that the king or queens could control people. If the king or queen did not agree with someone, he or she had the power to use cruel and unusual punishment. With the England Bill of Rights, this was stopped, which also restricted the power that the queen or king had. By restricting the power of the king and queen, the Bill of Rights laid the foundation for constitutional monarchy. This made England’s citizens not fear if an evil king or queen were in power. (English Bill of Rights 1689, …show more content…
(English Bill of Rights 1689, 2015) According to the textbook, The Essential World History, prior to the bill of rights freedom of speech was not allowed in parliament, if members were to say something that the queen or king did not like they could be impeached or thrown out of parliament. (Duiker & Spielvogel, 2014) By allowing freedom of speech in parliament, parliament had more control and could say things against the king’s or queen’s doings. The bill of rights law, no taxes being raised without approval from parliament, also gave Parliament power. This law prevented the king or queen from unnecessary taxes and allowed parliament to be able to control taxes for ligament causes. England’s Bill of Rights also allowed frequent free elections of parliament; this allows the parliament to be chosen by the people and keeps the king or queen from being able to create his or her own parliament to fit their agenda. By strengthen the power of Parliament, the bill of rights laid the foundation for constitutional monarch, and created a balanced government. (English Bill of Rights 1689,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Ap Us History
    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dbq Ap Us History

    This made it were parliament could pass laws. These laws could be made at any point in time. Colonist began to feel like they have lost total control of the colonies. Therefore the British thought the colonies weren’t able to make their own laws. This also meant they could not have hearings in their own court.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    14th Amendment Pros And Cons
    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages

    14th Amendment Pros And Cons

    The Bill of rights was added to the constitution in 1791 to ensure limited government and protect the right of the American people from the national government. The addition of the 14th amendment in 1868 required the states to also guarantee citizens their due process rights and equal protection of the law. The bill of rights has protected and expanded the rights of the citizens of the united states. In the picture with the man burning the flag is supposed to resemble the Texas v Johnson case of 1989 the court ruled in favor of Johnson because they believed that the bill of rights protects a person’s right of expression as long as it does not harm anyone else.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Great Awakening Vs Enlightenment Dbq
    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Great Awakening Vs Enlightenment Dbq

    In Document 2, Jonathan Mayhew states, “it is evidently, in itself, a thing of no consequence what the particular form of government is; whether the legislative and executive power be lodged in one and the same person, or in different persons; whether in one person, which is called monarchy.” With this being said, Mayhew believed they are all equal, but no one can become a monarchy without the other powers of the government. His idea of being successful in creating high powers is having three branches of government. Furthermore, Mayhew explains more about monarchy. In Document 2, he states “But no form of government seems to be so unlikely to accomplish this end as absolute monarchy.”…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Stamp Act Resolutions
    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Stamp Act Resolutions

    The conflict between Great Britain and her colonies in America was caused by many things. Some of the issues that caused this great conflict was rooted economically. One of the most known economically bases conflicts during the American Revolution was the Stamp Act of 1765. Parliament passed this act which would mandate that any paper product, such as; stamps, playing cards, and marriage certificates, all had to have an official British stamp on them. The colonists were outraged by this new law.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Did The English Bill Of Rights Influence Colonial America
    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How Did The English Bill Of Rights Influence Colonial America

    5) The English magna Carta was created in 1215 to place limits on the power of the monarch. The law making body of England, Parliament, was depended on the King and Queen to pay for wars as well as the Royal Government. Similar to the deeds of the magna Carta colonial assemblies controlled their colonies funds and had some control over colonial governors. Another model for Americans was the English Bill of Rights taking place during 1689.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    John Diefenbaker Canadian Bill Of Rights
    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John Diefenbaker Canadian Bill Of Rights

    John Diefenbaker and the Canadian Bill of Rights John Diefenbaker was the thirteenth Prime minister of Canada. He was elected in 1957, forming the Progressive Conservative Government, and from the beginning of his campaign, he made it a promise that he would create a Bill of Rights for Canada. He was a very progressive Prime Minister who believed in equality and fairness, “Diefenbaker brought diversity into government- he appointed the first woman to a cabinet post and the first Aboriginal person to the Senate.” (Canadian Decades 1960, p. 20) Citizens of Canada appreciated his dedication, and his commitment both to the Bill of Rights and to Canada deserves recognition. There was reasons that Canada needed a Bill of Rights.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Bill Of Rights Dbq
    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bill Of Rights Dbq

    The Bill of Rights is a series of items in one document that states our rights. All of them are very important. Three of them will be shown here. The 8th amendment from Document 8 is very important because the government will not be able to impose excessive fines on anybody.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Hope Of The Framers Analysis
    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Hope Of The Framers Analysis

    The argument made by Jack N. Rakove in his essay, “The Hope of the Framers to Recruit Citizens to Enter Public Life,”1 was more convincing than that made by Alfred F. Young in “The Pressure of the People on the Framers of the Constitution. ”2 Young focuses on the different motivations of the framers, while the point that Rakove is trying to make is how the framers of the Constitution of the United States3 , regardless of motivation, sought to include the common people in the affairs of the government by making political office accessible to citizens. The Constitution is designed to provide United States citizens an opportunity to run for office regardless of social standing, the balance of powers contained within prevent any one person or group…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Founding Fathers On Rights
    • 4450 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Founding Fathers On Rights

    The Founding Fathers on rights: Comparing the Federalists’ and Anti-Federalists’ views on rights, and what ended up in the Bill of Rights. In the year 1776, America was at the threshold of nationhood. There was debate and discussion about every aspect of this project because this new nation was a chance to change the things that the Founders disliked about the British rule. One of the divisive issues, was the necessity of the Bill of Rights.…

    • 4450 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Bill Of Rights Dbq
    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bill Of Rights Dbq

    One of the most persuasive arguments against the bill of rights was that of a shifting burden of proof. At the heart of the concern was that the introduction of such clauses would flip the presumption of the Constitution. As initially written, the Constitution placed the burden of demonstrating federal power to act on Congress and the President. In October 1787 James Wilson argued during the first state ratification debate in Pennsylvania—a discourse that brought him to national prominence as a spokesman for the Federalist cause—that “it would have been superfluous and absurd to have stipulated with a federal body of our own creation, that we should enjoy those privileges of which we are not divested.” By calling out specific rights, there would be a narrowing of rights to reflect merely those listed.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Jamestown Events
    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jamestown Events

    The United States is known for its lengthy history and historical development as the country dealt with revolutions, wars, slavery, and other significant events. However, there are ten events that are truly significant to America’s history and development. The first event would be the creation of Jamestown. Jamestown was created in 1605 when two groups of merchants who had formed joint stock companies that combined the investments of small shareholders, petitioned King James I for the right to colonize Virginia. Jamestown became the first permanent English settlement in the New World and has then been celebrated as the “birthplace of America”.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Goals
    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    American Revolution Goals

    The American Revolution was the most effective in achieving its goals and it was one of the most impactful revolutions. The Americans revolted because of taxation without representation. This includes the stamp act where the Americans had to pay taxes to the British on all foreign goods. They also wanted someone to represent them in parliament so the British don't continue to tax them. Another main reason is that we wanted self government.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Anti-Federalism
    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Anti-Federalism

    Anti-federalist correctly pointed out that the Constitution granted the federal courts an abundance of power, at the expense of the state and local courts. They wanted equal representation and supported implementing the Bill of Rights into the constitution for guaranteed protection of individual and natural rights. So when deciding to support Federalism or Anti-Federalism I choose Anti-federalism. Not only do I concur with the inclusion of the Bill of Rights and its necessity but I would have also side with them on senators and presidents being directly elected by the people.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    James Madison: The First Amendment And The Freedom Of Speech
    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Madison: The First Amendment And The Freedom Of Speech

    The first eleven amendments were written in the Constitution on September seventeenth in seventeen eighty-seven by James Madison. The first amendment included the freedom of speech. Even though James Madison wrote the first amendment, he was not the individual that came up with it. “Jefferson was concerned with the right to exercise religious freedom, freedom of speech and press” (who wrote). Thomas Jefferson who was his mentor, persuaded James Madison to include freedom of speech in an amendment in the constitution (who wrote).…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    King George III And British Funds After The French And Indian War
    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King George III And British Funds After The French And Indian War

    King George III and the British accumulated a massive debt after the French and Indian war. British Funds experience a dramatic shortage, so Parliament was forced to place taxes on the colonists to offset the accrued war expenses. Paying off the debt from the seven-year war was King George’s main concern. By taxing anyone who was neglected during the seven years’ war the British funds could add to their empire thus by strengthening it more. Taxation came in many forms, the first was the Sugar Act (1764), the Stamp Act (1765) and the Townshend Duties (1767).…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  Cookie Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings