The revolution begins in earnest when these cadres have assembled to themselves a great following of the discontent, from a spectrum of classes and interests, and commit illegal acts and direct challenges to the sovereignty of the old regime. Previously formulated demands are placed before the ruling class, radical changes which would require the “virtual abdication of those governing” (253). To quell the unrest, the government contemplates and applies military force. “One is impressed... more with the ineptitude of the governments’ use of force than with the skill of their opponents’ force” (252). The military forces fight poorly, are led badly, or desert, sometimes even over to the side of the enemy (88-89). The loss of the old regime’s
…show more content…
Charles I had immediately come into conflict with the British Parliament concerning taxation, and had to make compromises concerning the limitations of the King’s power. Encouraged by these concessions, Parliament began to deny the King traditional means of revenue such as customs and duties, to which Charles dissolved the Parliament. He began to run out of money and military exigencies (a Scottish Presbyterian army) had required him to call Parliament back into assembly in order to pay off the army. The Parliament called for him to answer for his violation of their rights in several incidents, to which he replied by attacking with some soldiers. However, the assault failed and Parliament assembled an army. While Charles I had the support his nobles and could field a well-trained army, he was unable to match the resources of Parliament, who assembled a vast host of soldiers that would ultimately defeat him. “Charles was beaten… because he lacked decisive military power” …show more content…
Because revolutions attack at those things which traditionally bind men into a society, the dictator does not utilize legal methods but by sheer force and the centralized power he inherited from the radical committee to accomplish unification. The dictator sets about destroy the terroristic radicals and strike down the worst of their legislation, recalling the political proscribed (209), and creating a new ruling class which “possess the privileges and wealth a ruling class hitherto always had”, content with the “stratification which has worked itself out during the revolution” (212). The dictator will restore many of the old dismantled institutions as necessary to ensure a return to normality. Once things have settled down, they will risk a democratic plebiscite, while continuing to nominally hold to the principles the revolution was initially fought for (212).
Although there are a number of extenuating circumstances and caveats, the four revolutions of Brinton’s The Anatomy of Revolution follow broad patterns and timelines, and can be compared and analyzed by these trends. Brinton’s conclusion are That is, that revolutions are caused by inefficient and bankrupt governments in times of economic growth, that they are led by cadres of revolutionaries with
Charles I had immediately come into conflict with the British Parliament concerning taxation, and had to make compromises concerning the limitations of the King’s power. Encouraged by these concessions, Parliament began to deny the King traditional means of revenue such as customs and duties, to which Charles dissolved the Parliament. He began to run out of money and military exigencies (a Scottish Presbyterian army) had required him to call Parliament back into assembly in order to pay off the army. The Parliament called for him to answer for his violation of their rights in several incidents, to which he replied by attacking with some soldiers. However, the assault failed and Parliament assembled an army. While Charles I had the support his nobles and could field a well-trained army, he was unable to match the resources of Parliament, who assembled a vast host of soldiers that would ultimately defeat him. “Charles was beaten… because he lacked decisive military power” …show more content…
Because revolutions attack at those things which traditionally bind men into a society, the dictator does not utilize legal methods but by sheer force and the centralized power he inherited from the radical committee to accomplish unification. The dictator sets about destroy the terroristic radicals and strike down the worst of their legislation, recalling the political proscribed (209), and creating a new ruling class which “possess the privileges and wealth a ruling class hitherto always had”, content with the “stratification which has worked itself out during the revolution” (212). The dictator will restore many of the old dismantled institutions as necessary to ensure a return to normality. Once things have settled down, they will risk a democratic plebiscite, while continuing to nominally hold to the principles the revolution was initially fought for (212).
Although there are a number of extenuating circumstances and caveats, the four revolutions of Brinton’s The Anatomy of Revolution follow broad patterns and timelines, and can be compared and analyzed by these trends. Brinton’s conclusion are That is, that revolutions are caused by inefficient and bankrupt governments in times of economic growth, that they are led by cadres of revolutionaries with