James I Tyranny Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
In the 17th century, James I and Charles I ruled over England with different tactics on how to govern their subjects. Tyranny is a popular description of both James I and Charles I, though; this title only suits Charles I more so than James I. James I was more understanding and tried to appeal to everyone’s needs. Charles I has no compassion for his subjects and does not hold a connection with them as he rules them and only thinks of himself. James I is more sympathetic to his subjects and sees his role as a father and believes he is providing them with care.

James I believed that the monarchy is perfect and is that it creates a sense of order in his kingdom. Creating his manifesto, he uses a family household as an example of how he views …show more content…
Charles I ruling was very controlling in sense that he believed that whatever he did was justified because he had the divine right to rule. In Kishlansky article, he questions Charles I intelligence, many other critiques have gone far to call him stupid because of his lack of knowledge with the avoidable situations he has gotten himself in. Kishlansky also mentions that Charles has a lack of empathy for his subjects. (43) by Charles being disconnected with everyone, it proves the idea of him being a tyrant, since he cannot sympathies with people he does not have a connection with, whatever happens to them he would not feel the least bit of empathy. He sees everyone who crosses him or disagrees with him as an enemy and that just continues the separation he has with his subjects. (43), The division he has with his people is to the point where he sees no point in pleasing their wants and focuses on what is beneficial for him and his own needs. Though his taxation on the people was to create a balance in England’s Finance, he achieved it by using a medieval method called Ship Money. Ship money taxation is brought back to support the wars Charles I participated in, only to lose each of …show more content…
What sets Charles I and James I is that Charles I sees he has the right of way for whatever he does and does not worry about the opinions of his subjects since he has the ‘divine right’. James I shows more compassion and that he cares for his subjects by demonstrating a father analogy for being king. Charles I simply does not keep his subjects in his thoughts while he makes his decision, and because of this, he angers many of his subjects to the point of executing him. James I understood the consequence of the power his subjects hold and if he is a bad king, he will be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Was Oliver Cromwell A Military Dictator?
    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Was Oliver Cromwell A Military Dictator?

    Oliver Cromwell is an important figure in English history as he held a unique position of ruling as ‘Lord Protector’ instead of a monarch. This could result in Cromwell being perceived as a military dictator because the legality of his rule could be questioned. In addition to this he could be seen as an opportunist for military power because his increase in status was due to his role in the army in the First and Second English Civil Wars from 1642 to 1649 and he rose to prominence after the execution and abolition of monarchy on the 30th of January 1649. However, Cromwell not being part of the traditional constitution does not mean he should be viewed as a military dictator. The first section of this essay will portray how Cromwell in terms…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    How Did The Glorious Revolution Dbq
    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages

    How Did The Glorious Revolution Dbq

    During the late 1600’s England was going through a power struggle of who was going to be appointed the next King of England after the death of Charles II. In the events of 1688 and 1689 known as the Glorious Revolution, Mary and Prince William of Orange took the throne instead of James II who was the brother of Charles. Those events resulted on heated arguments between the proponents and the opponents of those events. One of the people who publicly supported James II legitimacy to the throne was Thomas Cartwright. Thomas Cartwright was a bishop of the Church of England and he was a big supporter of the divine right of Kings.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Charles Dickens Ambiguous Characters
    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Charles Dickens Ambiguous Characters

    Charles Dickens portrays Madame Defarge, Sydney Carton, and Charles Darney as morally ambiguous characters. Dickens’ background as a muckraker dissected into it to reveal the hidden story boiling underneath human nature. Muckrakers are incredibly objective, as was Dickens’ writing style. His past experiences gave him an insight of morally ambiguous characters to use in his novel. Madame Defarge can clearly be described as hasty, vengeful, whatever nasty adjective seen fit.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Character Analysis Of The Clean House By Sarah Ruhl
    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Character Analysis Of The Clean House By Sarah Ruhl

    In The Clean House by Sarah Ruhl, two characters stand out to me. Virginia, who is Lane 's sister and Lane 's estranged husband, Charles. The traits, characteristics and dialogue develop these characters in my mind 's eye. The personality of Charles is that he is smart, charismatic as well as a detail-oriented person.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    James I And The Roundheads Analysis
    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    James I And The Roundheads Analysis

    In the seventeenth century the political situation was very critical and complicated, the struggle between the political powers specially the struggle between the cavaliers and the roundheads was very severe. But sure am with the roundheads, am so convinced with their point of view; because when James I and his son Charles I, they both believed in divine right and wanted to rule as an absolute monarch so his view caused conflicts with the parliament, as Charles began expanding power, he asked for money but the parliament didn’t grant it to him until he signs the petition of right which limited the king’s power When they refused to give him the money again after signing the document, he dismissed the parliament, and decided to rule on his…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    King James Criticism
    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King James Criticism

    But James is not always praised and his criticism is often based on two of his policies: the Irish plantation and the reformation of the Scottish Kirk both, some believe, being major factors in the explosion of the Civil War in the 1640s. It is true that if James was a flexible monarch who favored stability he did tried to pass more revolutionary policies. Notably towards James’s other major source of dislike: the Scottish Kirk. If James did not like the English Parliament he was on the other hand very fond of the English Church. It was a Calvinist church supervised by bishops and had the king as the head of the church while in Scotland the Scottish kirk was trying to get rid of bishops and parishes.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Thomas Paine's Common Sense Changed American Revolution
    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Thomas Paine's Common Sense Changed American Revolution

    The first battles of the Revolution took place in 1775, but the colonists had not yet decided to actually try to become independent. Many of them still wanted to try to reconcile with England. On January 10, 1776, the pamphlet Common Sense was published and written by the Englishman, Thomas Paine. The publication of Common Sense changed American Revolution. Paine’s pamphlet used persuasive arguments to convince the colonists of the need to rebel against Britain.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Theme Of Violence In John Steinbeck's East Of Eden
    • 1545 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Theme Of Violence In John Steinbeck's East Of Eden

    Maturing, Charles was always energetic and athletically built. Charles, being the braver brother rather than the older brother, he protected Adam from the school boys, “Charles fought any boy who challenged or slurred him” (20). Cal also shadowed Adam from the furry of their father. When they were younger, Charles was beat by Adam in a game of pee wee and that made Charles extremely mad. Charles was conceited about his empowering strength, seeing as how it was the only thing that he had that Adam did not have.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Social Tensions In Colonial America
    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Social Tensions In Colonial America

    The non-Indian population grew exponentially in the 1700’s throughout America. Europeans from many countries continued to transplant their lives into the colonies, bringing with them their cultures, religions, family values, and their need for prosperity. Many came to America for asylum, to escape religious persecution back home from the grasp of the Catholic Church. Turmoil also plagued England, which brought about the English Civil War in 1642 between the King and his supporters fighting against the Parliament forces who (were mostly Puritans) organized a military force to overthrow and behead the monarch 7 years later (Brinkley, 2012, p. 50). New colonies were being established with settlers moving further south into the Carolinas and…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Colonists Justified Rebellion
    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Colonists Justified Rebellion

    I wish to inform and assure you that the American War for Independence indeed constitutes the colonists' justified rebellion. We are employing only the grandest of causes in our fight -- rights, independence, and our liberty. You will remember that throughout the 1760s and early 1770s, we found ourselves increasingly at odds with British imperial policies regarding taxation and frontier policy which eventually culminated in parliament's declaration that it can "of right make laws to bind us in all cases whatsoever" (Setting Forth the Causes and Necessity of Their Taking up Arms). "What, [I beseech you,] is to defend us against so enormous and unlimited a power? Not a single man of those who assume it, is chosen by us; or is subject to our control or influence; but, on the contrary, they are all exempt from such laws and from American revenue.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine Analysis
    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Thomas Paine Analysis

    As an Englishman, Thomas Paine recognized the illusion of greatness kings believe to be born with, but it’s not entirely the king 's fault. The people are responsible for allowing heredity succession to be practiced since the early ages, “till the Jews under a national delusion requested a king” (pg. 14), even when the scripture clearly warned the Jews the “king of heaven” (pg. 14) is the only one with the right to rule over them. The Jews, from Paine’s example, did not give any qualifications to their king or had any specific characteristics to look for in a king, they simply rushed with the decision without knowing if that person was worthy or capable of having absolute power. Heredity succession is hard to get rid of when the king feels entitled to keeping it in his family and make future successors believe wisdom can be passed on from one ruler to…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is England Justified In Declaring Independence
    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is England Justified In Declaring Independence

    In the 1600’s England had hopes of world domination, which is why with the discovery of the new world, North America, they founded thirteen new colonies along the eastern coast in hopes of claiming it for themselves; little did they know that in a hundred years or so they would be fighting the very colonists they had sent there in the first place. This didn’t just happen overnight, many attempts by the English to control the colonists took place and led to their build up resentment and resistance towards their motherland and to eventually declare their independence from England and start their own country. Some of the more strict laws and restrictions set in place by the Empire, and parliament, to establish greater control over the colonies included heavy taxations on almost anything and everything, not allowing Westward expansion, and invasion of the colonist privacy with the mutiny act. England took many steps to try to control the colonist but would in the end be extremely unsuccessful.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution: The Boston Massacre
    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages

    American Revolution: The Boston Massacre

    During the time of the 1760s and 1770s the talk of freedom was on the tongues of many in the colonies. In the eyes of a great deal of freedom hungry people, the New World was the image of a haven where people could escape to find what they had been searching for. Many found freedom here, but it came at a costly price. One of the most well known and controversial events during the era of the American Revolution was The Boston Massacre. Many other predicaments came prior to this happening that placed the British soldiers in Boston for The Boston Massacre to take place.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    King George III And British Funds After The French And Indian War
    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King George III And British Funds After The French And Indian War

    King George III and the British accumulated a massive debt after the French and Indian war. British Funds experience a dramatic shortage, so Parliament was forced to place taxes on the colonists to offset the accrued war expenses. Paying off the debt from the seven-year war was King George’s main concern. By taxing anyone who was neglected during the seven years’ war the British funds could add to their empire thus by strengthening it more. Taxation came in many forms, the first was the Sugar Act (1764), the Stamp Act (1765) and the Townshend Duties (1767).…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Natural Order In Macbeth
    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Importance Of Natural Order In Macbeth

    According to the Elizabethan world view, life is governed by a rigid and God-ordained natural order known as the Great Chain of Being. Every aspect of his creation, whether animate or inanimate, tangible or intangible, has its own distinctive place within this hierarchy. It is therefore believed that any interference with this order is a direct violation of nature’s organization and, above all, an act of sacrilegious insubordination towards God’s will. At the top of mankind’s social order lies the monarch, who is given the right to reign over his realm without condition through the decree of God. As a result, any attempt to unseat or undermine the authority of the king is seen as defiance against God Himself, the sole creator of this ordered…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings