James I Tyranny Analysis

Improved Essays
Show More
In the 17th century, James I and Charles I ruled over England with different tactics on how to govern their subjects. Tyranny is a popular description of both James I and Charles I, though; this title only suits Charles I more so than James I. James I was more understanding and tried to appeal to everyone’s needs. Charles I has no compassion for his subjects and does not hold a connection with them as he rules them and only thinks of himself. James I is more sympathetic to his subjects and sees his role as a father and believes he is providing them with care.

James I believed that the monarchy is perfect and is that it creates a sense of order in his kingdom. Creating his manifesto, he uses a family household as an example of how he views …show more content…
Charles I ruling was very controlling in sense that he believed that whatever he did was justified because he had the divine right to rule. In Kishlansky article, he questions Charles I intelligence, many other critiques have gone far to call him stupid because of his lack of knowledge with the avoidable situations he has gotten himself in. Kishlansky also mentions that Charles has a lack of empathy for his subjects. (43) by Charles being disconnected with everyone, it proves the idea of him being a tyrant, since he cannot sympathies with people he does not have a connection with, whatever happens to them he would not feel the least bit of empathy. He sees everyone who crosses him or disagrees with him as an enemy and that just continues the separation he has with his subjects. (43), The division he has with his people is to the point where he sees no point in pleasing their wants and focuses on what is beneficial for him and his own needs. Though his taxation on the people was to create a balance in England’s Finance, he achieved it by using a medieval method called Ship Money. Ship money taxation is brought back to support the wars Charles I participated in, only to lose each of …show more content…
What sets Charles I and James I is that Charles I sees he has the right of way for whatever he does and does not worry about the opinions of his subjects since he has the ‘divine right’. James I shows more compassion and that he cares for his subjects by demonstrating a father analogy for being king. Charles I simply does not keep his subjects in his thoughts while he makes his decision, and because of this, he angers many of his subjects to the point of executing him. James I understood the consequence of the power his subjects hold and if he is a bad king, he will be

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    How Did Charles 1 Violate The Magna Carta
    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Did Charles 1 Violate The Magna Carta

    Much dispute came from the English Constitution, as it was an unwritten document. The Magna Carta though, a part of the English Constitution, was written. The Magna Carta took feudal custom and documented it. Charles violated the Magna Carta when he took property from individuals. The Magna Carta states that the only way you can be deprived of property is through jury trial in a court of law. Charles would take land, without the jury trial. The five knights that Charles had imprisoned because they didn’t pay the tax, believed that according to the Magna Carta they should not be detained as “‘no man should be imprisoned except by the legal judgement of his peers or by the law of the land’” (Rebellion, p. 132). The defenders of Charles said that the command of the King is enough to imprison them and that there doesn’t have to be any other cause. Charles ruling like this upset the people and made them dislike him even…

    • 1882 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Tudor Period: Religious Change And Reformation
    • 2066 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Tudor Period: Religious Change And Reformation

    Through the Act in Restraint of Appeals in 1533, England was now considered an empire. This meant the king could not be skirted around. The king was the ultimate power. It was also through the idea of imperial kingship that made the kings and queens to go to war against France and other European rivals such as Spain; they wanted to conquer to expand the power of England over the European World and eventually the entire world. Imperial kingship is also Renaissance period because the kings were looking at Ancient figures such as Achilles to be a guide in how to lead. Although kingship had been around far before this, the Renaissance gave it a name and it also gave justifications as to why a country should be run as an imperial kingship.…

    • 2066 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Failure Of Oliver Cromwell During The English Civil War
    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Failure Of Oliver Cromwell During The English Civil War

    The failures of Oliver Cromwell brought a relapse of the Stuart dynasty, of what he had once tried to eliminate. Even though he ended the rule of Charles I of England, in the end his strict governing led to the rebellion of the English people against him. This led to Charles II, Charles I’s son, to rule, in a way, relapsing his father’s rule. Oliver Cromwell’s main purpose of the disposal of the king Charles I was he was ruling England as a absolutist; although, that is what Oliver Cromwell himself ended up doing during his reign of power of the country of England. During the English Civil War Oliver Cromwell was a strong soldier, but a deficient ruler of the people. Oliver Cromwell was no better at ruling the people of England than the Stuart…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Character Analysis Of The Clean House By Sarah Ruhl
    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Character Analysis Of The Clean House By Sarah Ruhl

    The personality of Charles is that he is smart, charismatic as well as a detail-oriented person. He is a surgeon with a specialty by trade, indicated by the dialogue in Act 1, scene 10. As far as Virginia, we learn that she is depressed with her life, she is college educated and dealing with some obsessive behaviors indicated in her conversation with Matilde.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Charles Dickens Ambiguous Characters
    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Charles Dickens Ambiguous Characters

    Charles flat out has two identities. He is Darnay or he is Evrémonde. Charles was born in to the toxic name Evrémonde, giving you a negative lens over him. However, he always strives greatness and what is best for his family. I feel the name Evrémonde gives him the passive aspect of his personality. In way it controls him to be better as well. "I know that when she is clinging to you, the hands of baby, girl, and woman, all in one, are round your neck. I know that in loving you she sees and loves her mother at her own age, sees and loves you at my age, loves her mother broken-hearted, loves you through your dreadful trial and in your blessed restoration." (2.10.39) When asking for Lucie’s hand in marriage he completely understands the tight relationship between Dr. Manette and Lucie. Charles is another character that clearly demonstrates the theme of Family.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    King James Criticism
    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King James Criticism

    However his rule was highly influenced by his personality and his ability to negotiate and to concede to his opponents, a quality his successor did not possess. Contrary to many rulers (especially contrary to his direct predecessor and follower) James was less radical and did not imposed, as forcefully as some others might have done, his principles or idea on his people to their breaking point. This had, for a long time, been seen as a weakness but his recent rehabilitation rather points out that this attitude proved efficient and the key to James success. Nowadays James implication in the civil wars of the 1640s is lessened and the fault is mostly accorded to his son Charles, who was stricter and refused many of his father's ideologies or opinions. There is no denying that James's problematic religious policies participated in the growing instability and the rising tensions of the kingdoms but it may not have reached the breaking point had Charles been more…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    How Did The Glorious Revolution Dbq
    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages

    How Did The Glorious Revolution Dbq

    During the late 1600’s England was going through a power struggle of who was going to be appointed the next King of England after the death of Charles II. In the events of 1688 and 1689 known as the Glorious Revolution, Mary and Prince William of Orange took the throne instead of James II who was the brother of Charles. Those events resulted on heated arguments between the proponents and the opponents of those events. One of the people who publicly supported James II legitimacy to the throne was Thomas Cartwright. Thomas Cartwright was a bishop of the Church of England and he was a big supporter of the divine right of Kings. Cartwright passionately stated that religion “sets the crown fast and easy upon the King’s head, without catechizing…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Thomas Paine's Common Sense Changed American Revolution
    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Thomas Paine's Common Sense Changed American Revolution

    He states a biblical and historical perspective of the distinction of men into kings and subjects. He states, that all men are equal in creation and says no man could have the right to establish his family as forever presiding over the others. Even if a person deserves certain honors, they do not have the right to pass those honors on. Therefore, he concluded that hereditary succession has brought nothing but bad governance. The Britain’s colony is what brought about the need for protection in the first place. As there have been at least eight civil wars and nineteen rebellions in Britain’s…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    James I And The Roundheads Analysis
    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    James I And The Roundheads Analysis

    In the seventeenth century the political situation was very critical and complicated, the struggle between the political powers specially the struggle between the cavaliers and the roundheads was very severe. But sure am with the roundheads, am so convinced with their point of view; because when James I and his son Charles I, they both believed in divine right and wanted to rule as an absolute monarch so his view caused conflicts with the parliament, as Charles began expanding power, he asked for money but the parliament didn’t grant it to him until he signs the petition of right which limited the king’s power When they refused to give him the money again after signing the document, he dismissed the parliament, and decided to rule on his…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Colonists Justified Rebellion
    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Colonists Justified Rebellion

    You will remember that throughout the 1760s and early 1770s, we found ourselves increasingly at odds with British imperial policies regarding taxation and frontier policy which eventually culminated in parliament's declaration that it can "of right make laws to bind us in all cases whatsoever" (Setting Forth the Causes and Necessity of Their Taking up Arms). "What, [I beseech you,] is to defend us against so enormous and unlimited a power? Not a single man of those who assume it, is chosen by us; or is subject to our control or influence; but, on the contrary, they are all exempt from such laws and from American revenue. We have incessantly and ineffectually besieged the throne as supplicants; we have reasoned and remonstrated with parliament in the most mild and decent language" (Setting Forth the Causes and Necessity of Their Taking up Arms) to no avail. "In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    James I And Absolutism
    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    James I And Absolutism

    He ruled England with the thought that everyone should obey and follow him. This caused a divide between him and the people as he held the most power. • Charles I and absolutism: Charles I ruled England between the death of his father, James I, in 1625 to his execution in 1649. He was the first ruling King of England to be executed and his greed for absolute power was the reason behind the English Civil war and the period of 11 years without a monarchy. • When Charles came to the throne after his father’s death there was high tension with parliament began at once due to Charles’ belief in the ‘Divine Right of Kings’ and his attempts at absolute power for the monarchy. • One of his first acts was to dissolve parliament in 1625, and again in 1626. In 1629, he dissolved parliament again and ruled without it until 1640. He summoned the ‘Short Parliament’ in April of 1640 but dissolved them after three weeks when they refused to grant him funds. • In November of 1640 the ‘Long Parliament’ as assembled and passed an act that stated it couldn’t be dissolved without its own…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is England Justified In Declaring Independence
    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is England Justified In Declaring Independence

    In the 1600’s England had hopes of world domination, which is why with the discovery of the new world, North America, they founded thirteen new colonies along the eastern coast in hopes of claiming it for themselves; little did they know that in a hundred years or so they would be fighting the very colonists they had sent there in the first place. This didn’t just happen overnight, many attempts by the English to control the colonists took place and led to their build up resentment and resistance towards their motherland and to eventually declare their independence from England and start their own country. Some of the more strict laws and restrictions set in place by the Empire, and parliament, to establish greater control over the colonies included heavy taxations on almost anything and everything, not allowing Westward expansion, and invasion of the colonist privacy with the mutiny act. England took many steps to try to control the colonist but would in the end be extremely unsuccessful.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutist Rulers: Louis XIV Of France
    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutist Rulers: Louis XIV Of France

    He attempted to be an absolutist leader, but ultimately failed. He made very rash and poor decisions and tried to evade Parliament in the decisions he wanted to make such as levying taxes without Parliament permission. Radical Parliament members eventually got fed up with Charles I. A civil war was started in England and eventually England had Charles I executed for treason. Civil war and financial problems were the result of Charles I aspirations to become an absolutist leader in England.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Natural Order In Macbeth
    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Importance Of Natural Order In Macbeth

    According to the Elizabethan world view, life is governed by a rigid and God-ordained natural order known as the Great Chain of Being. Every aspect of his creation, whether animate or inanimate, tangible or intangible, has its own distinctive place within this hierarchy. It is therefore believed that any interference with this order is a direct violation of nature’s organization and, above all, an act of sacrilegious insubordination towards God’s will. At the top of mankind’s social order lies the monarch, who is given the right to reign over his realm without condition through the decree of God. As a result, any attempt to unseat or undermine the authority of the king is seen as defiance against God Himself, the sole creator of this ordered…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Did Charles 1 Abuse Of Power
    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Did Charles 1 Abuse Of Power

    Furthermore, Charles I wanted to change religious concepts and move the Church of England away from Calvinism. He attempted to shift the religion into a more traditional and sacramental direction. This dramatic change was strongly unwelcomed among the people. Charles I exemplified his power and would “…punish those who refused to accept his reforms and enforce any punishment whatsoever (including torture), with the sole exception of death”. This demonstrated his absolute rule because he was able to solely change England’s religion, appoint a new bishop, and create new policies. It also showed the lawlessness of the court because citizens can be punished for disobeying Charles I’s new religious policies without trial. The change in religion created conflicts between the church and the people because citizen’s strongly disagreed with the new religious policies. It led to protests and uprising against the monarchy because they were forced to obey and had no religious freedom. Another outcome of Charles I’s actions was the English Civil War. He dismissed Parliament because the members often disagreed with his methods. But, he later reappointed…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings