Leadership and its effects
The critique derived from two articles “Bad Leaders They can cripple your team” & “The Causes and Consequences of Bad Leadership”
This is the critique from two articles “The Causes and Consequences of Bad Leadership.” (Schilling, & Schyns, 2014) and “Bad Leaders: They can cripple your team.” (Kellerman, 2007). In an attempt to describe the reasons of emerging of a bad leader & effects of a bad leadership and measures to be taken to reduce the effect caused by bad leadership. This review has been chosen to push the reader’s limits of thinking to figure out the nature of a leader he or she is following or to determine the mission of the reader himself if reader by himself is acting as a leader or encountering bad leadership. …show more content…
Not only the person charisma make a person stand out in an organization but that person should have followers to become a leader and the approach of the good leader and bad leader are different towards their followers. A good leader has the positive approach and most commonly, followers approach the good leader because of the positive and good charisma he builds around him. Whereas a bad leader approaches his followers in enforced way or the followers inspired by the wrong insight of a mission which the followers want but later manipulated to bad leader’s comfort may also be one reason that influence followers to choose the bad leader. This unknowingly effect the followers in a long run where only few or one person is profited and rest must face the …show more content…
First, and most important one she talks about the tenure of the leaders as limiting the tenure of the leaders will give an effective leadership as they stay questionable for what have they done in short term. And more over a person who is enjoying long term leadership may not concentrate on organization growth any more.
The author Kellerman also talks about choosing Sharing of power rather centralized power which could have better chances of controlling an organization if went out of control. Keeping feet on ground which means not losing touch with reality and remembering the goal is most important as these are the basic principles that guide leader and organization to its destination. Staying healthy and organized and developing a personal support who encourages with love is a best practice of balanced leadership. Though most of the leaders spend their time in organization doing hard work for the best outcome but still fail or give little because of the unbalanced life they lead. And Controlling their materialistic love towards money and sex and worldly things is also one of the qualities of a good
The critique derived from two articles “Bad Leaders They can cripple your team” & “The Causes and Consequences of Bad Leadership”
This is the critique from two articles “The Causes and Consequences of Bad Leadership.” (Schilling, & Schyns, 2014) and “Bad Leaders: They can cripple your team.” (Kellerman, 2007). In an attempt to describe the reasons of emerging of a bad leader & effects of a bad leadership and measures to be taken to reduce the effect caused by bad leadership. This review has been chosen to push the reader’s limits of thinking to figure out the nature of a leader he or she is following or to determine the mission of the reader himself if reader by himself is acting as a leader or encountering bad leadership. …show more content…
Not only the person charisma make a person stand out in an organization but that person should have followers to become a leader and the approach of the good leader and bad leader are different towards their followers. A good leader has the positive approach and most commonly, followers approach the good leader because of the positive and good charisma he builds around him. Whereas a bad leader approaches his followers in enforced way or the followers inspired by the wrong insight of a mission which the followers want but later manipulated to bad leader’s comfort may also be one reason that influence followers to choose the bad leader. This unknowingly effect the followers in a long run where only few or one person is profited and rest must face the …show more content…
First, and most important one she talks about the tenure of the leaders as limiting the tenure of the leaders will give an effective leadership as they stay questionable for what have they done in short term. And more over a person who is enjoying long term leadership may not concentrate on organization growth any more.
The author Kellerman also talks about choosing Sharing of power rather centralized power which could have better chances of controlling an organization if went out of control. Keeping feet on ground which means not losing touch with reality and remembering the goal is most important as these are the basic principles that guide leader and organization to its destination. Staying healthy and organized and developing a personal support who encourages with love is a best practice of balanced leadership. Though most of the leaders spend their time in organization doing hard work for the best outcome but still fail or give little because of the unbalanced life they lead. And Controlling their materialistic love towards money and sex and worldly things is also one of the qualities of a good