Argument On Life After Death

Decent Essays
The argument on life and death always existed. It influences us to rethink if there is life after death. Philosophers, such as Socrates and Plato emphasize on it by using various concepts. There is a life after death because the soul is immortal and death is a temporary interruption, but not an end to life. That means life after death exists.
The existence of an afterlife exists due to the existence of a pre-life. This means individual human soul existed before the beginning of the living human and it continues to live even after death. Furthermore, pre-life creates the necessity to have an afterlife. As Socrates titled it as “law of opposites”. It means, “An afterlife as constrained by a pre-life”. As it can be elaborated further that the
…show more content…
First of all, a mind cannot survive without the existence of the body. After the death, the function of the mind shuts down itself since it no longer cannot work without a body, which stops running as well. Secondly, body helps the mind to illustrate the ideas of the mind. This means, when the body is not functioning, a mind cannot project its ideas. Also, mind and soul are connected and depends on each other to function properly, which is only possible when a person is living. Hence, why life after death does not exist since the body is no longer available to accompany the mind neck to neck. Both are needed to function in a proper manner, and one cannot function without another. This means the existence of life after death is flawed because neither mind can exist or function after the body decays, which is only possible after the …show more content…
We are more than material bodies. This mean, within ourselves, the commodity of spirituality exists. This spirituality is the only existence survives after the death of the body. Such as, the idea of progeny is a reassurance of unending life after death.
To conclude, life after death does exist. Socrates helped us to understand it through simplifying the idea of the existence of soul by constructing the body and soul as separate entities. Also, it means that life represents the body and death represent the soul, and collectively it makes living possible for a human. Though the idea does exist, that life after death does not exist, but it fails to comprehend that the existence of the soul is eternal, and it can live without a body. Thus, life after death exists since soul tends to live

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Abdulkabir Adejumo Professor Escalante PHILO 1301 11/2/2017 Response Paper 1 “Do We Survive Death?” In this interesting chapter, James Rachels starts by uncovering the philosophy of Socrates about the immortal soul. At that point, he utilizes the scientific argument to conflict with Socrates' conclusion about the presence of the soul as a piece of the human body.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. In David Foster Wallace’s 2005 Commencement Speech “This is Water,” he talks about a default setting, which is something people do automatically. It is the concept of going through life without actually considering what is going on around you.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates’ argument at the end of Apology is that death is a blessing in one of two ways. It is either a “state of nothingness” or it is a “migration of the soul.” If death is comprised of nothingness, then it should be looked forward to because it would be a peaceful and restful sleep. On the other hand, if death is a migration of his soul, then Socrates would be able to be in the presence of the great people that have died before him, so he would be able to enjoy the afterlife surrounded by great figures that he could question regarding their wisdom. Socrates’ argument that death is a “state of nothingness” is self-contradictory because something cannot become nothing if it was once something, so his argument that death would comprise…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The four theories of personal identity—body theory, soul theory, memory theory, brain theory— are very well discussed in John Perry's book, A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality. In an argument between Gretchen Weirob, Sam Miller, and Dave Cohen, all these theories are put into question in a discussion about the possibility of life after death. Overall, throughout the book , in these discussions it seems as if the body theory wins the argument for having more pros and fewer cons than the memory, brain and soul theories. However, this theory is contradicted and deemed not possible because when the body dies the person identity no longer exists.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My thesis is that Socrates does not present good arguments. In Socrates’ argument that piety is dependent on the gods, Socrates uses a series of analogies that are relatable to piety. Socrates describes the physical state of carrying or leading objects and that to be carried or led, they must have been put into that state by something carrying them. Thus, the things being carried are in a state of being carried and since piety is a mental state, it is parallel to the state of being carried.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The body, while seemingly clearly definable and understandable, is a concept that humans have struggled to define and understand for much of history. Social conceptions of the mind of spirit shaped philosophers’ understandings of the relationship between the mind and body, as well as attitudes toward the body. In his essay “The Concept of the Body,” Eliot Deutsch presents readers with four popular modes of conceiving of the body. These models, popularized at different points throughout history, are the prison, the temple, the machine, and the instrument. Through reading Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, one gains perspective on Socrates’ conception of the body, as a prison.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our soul is immortal and our body is mortal and therefore when our bodies die, our soul will continue to live. The Opposites Argument is also known as the Cyclical Argument because it clarifies the cycle of death and life. The cycle includes the dead being created from the living and through death, the living are created from the dead through their birth. The soul extracts itself completely unscathed from the physical body at our death then enters another body at birth. The soul, which always brings life, is eternal and enduring.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, one can prove that death is a result of life because it occurs afterwards, but you cannot prove that life is a result of death due to the fact that that one cannot recollect there death when they are alive. Therefore, the “Argument from Opposites” fails to prove the immortality of the…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I was amazed by my situation and keep wondering that “what on earth is going on?” Apparently, although my body disappeared right in front of my friend’s eyes, I can’t say that I disappear as well. I still exist in nowhere, wondering and urgently wanted to come back and finish my assignment. This is an example in which I can clearly and distinctly conceive I exist without my body. Therefore, we can conceive that we exist without our body.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That as Descartes suggests there is a non-material existence of my mind referred to as dualism that is incorporated within my soul which enables me to be conscious perhaps to see when I no longer have a pair of eyes (Ibid). However, a scientific naturalist would propose that “our personal experiences and emotions are intimately linked to our body chemistry” (Peterson, et al., Philosophy of Religion, p.509). Suggesting it is our physicality, our brain that allows us to have a conscious and experience our emotions. Once physical death occurs and the brain dies then so do…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Apology” Socrates is on trial for crimes he has not committed. Socrates ultimately does not fear death because of his innocence, he believes that death is not feared because it may be one of the greatest blessings of the soul. For a person such as Socrates that has lived virtuously there no reason for them to fear death. Socrates makes the argument that one should not fear death because only the gods know what is beyond death,because death could be a blessing. According to Socrates, “I had at the risk of death, like anyone else, remained at my post where those you had elected to command had ordered me, and then, when the god ordered me, as I thought and believed, to live the life as a philosopher, to examine myself and others,…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates’s Argument on Death The topic of death frightens human beings for several reasons because of the speculation and the anxiety that surround death. Even though most people fear death, philosophers such as Socrates argue that there is no valid reason to fear death (Ahrensdorf 1995). According to 5Socrates, death is a blessing in the context of the relocation of the soul. Socrates avers that death is something that people should not fear and provide several arguments to validate his argument.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I believe that, by using Socrates’ own arguments, we can see that the soul cannot, in fact, be deathless. Socrates says that the soul is what gives the body life: “what is it that, present in a body, makes it living? – A soul” (Plato, Phaedo, 105d). So, it seems that, without the soul, the body itself would be lifeless. If the soul is the only thing that gives the body life, then how is it possible for us to die?…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato’s “Apology” examines the trial of a great philosopher named Socrates. He is brought to court because of corrupting the youth and not believing in Gods. In response against his accusers, Socrates maintains that being sentenced to death is a possibility. While others fear death, as it is an evil; he does not fear it as he views death positively. According to Socrates, death is an advantage.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keats' Philosophy of Life And Death A man who avoids death will never mature, and he will never profoundly understand and solve the problem of existence. In life, people inevitably encounter a variety of problems, the limited life and unlimited desires, the eternal desire to live with the inevitable death of the fate of the contradictions, etc., contained in the lives of everyone , Thus constituting the predicament of human existence. Life and death, as a phenomenon, reflects people's concern for their own life. Being a problem, life and death reflect the thinking of people about the nature of their existence.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays